Eli Lewis On Rocco Steele’s Raw Cock: “It’s Pure Fucking Ecstasy!”

Posted February 17, 2015 by with 68 comments

img_6649

Gaysian Prince of gay porn Eli Lewis made his bareback debut last week on BarebackThatHole.com, but this wasn’t just any bareback debut. For his first time getting fucked raw, Eli chose to bottom bareback for a man with arguably the biggest cock in all of gay porn right now, Rocco Steele. What did it feel like, would he ever do it again, and why did he switch from condoms to bareback porn? I chatted with Eli Lewis briefly to find out.

img_6541

Str8UpGayPorn: Eli! Good lord, what was it like sitting on Rocco Steele’s cock for the first time?
Eli Lewis: Taking Rocco for the first time brought me back to my teenage years when I was first discovering what it was like to be a bottom. You see it online and you think it’s huge, but it’s way bigger and more daunting in person.

Did it hurt, did it feel good, or was it a mix of both?
The head teasing your hole is exciting, but once he starts to slide inside, you panic and don’t think you can take him. He’s amazing though, and knows how to ease you into it. The experience is exhilarating and painfully delicious. It’s pure fucking ecstasy!

dsc05899

For those who haven’t seen it yet, were you able to take every inch of his cock, all the way down?
I could sit here and boast being able to take Daddy Rocco’s cock to the base like a champ, but you’ll have to watch the scene for yourself to really find out…

dsc05917

Was this the biggest cock you’ve ever taken?
Rocco Steele’s cock is by far the largest, thickest, and most amazing cock I’ve ever had the pleasure of taking.

Would you do it again?
Yes! I can’t wait to have him ravage me over and over again!

img_6657

Did you have any reservations about switching over to bareback porn?
I had been discussing the option of making the crossover to working in both condom and bareback porn with a lot of my close friends and fellow performers for awhile before finally deciding to do it with Rocco. My reservations were mostly about how this would affect my public image as a performer as well as translate into my personal life. What it really comes down to is personal responsibility, and how I present myself as someone who is knowledgeable of the risk factors. I act based on the facts and the discussions I have with my partners.

img_6709Making the switch to bareback porn definitely isn’t as shocking as it used to be.
Bareback porn is out there, it is fetishized, and I think we as porn performers are in a position where we’re generally more knowledgeable of sexual health because it’s part of our job description. I sometimes bareback in my personal life, and I’ve now begun to accept offers to work for bareback studios, but that doesn’t change my views on safer sex practices. I educate myself, I ask questions, and I have conversations with my partners about our HIV statuses and STI screenings. From there, we can make informed choices as consenting adults.

img_6607Trailer for Rocco Steele barebacking Eli Lewis (watch full video here):

[BarebackThatHole.com: Rocco Steele Fucks Eli Lewis Raw]

 

  • sxg

    It’s a really good scene, Rocco was certainly into it. I kind of wish Eli started small and built up the suspense to something the size of Rocco. Now I feel like he has to bottom for guys equivalent to Rocco or it just isn’t enough for him lol

    • n24rc

      Rocco is into “it” because he is a filthy pig.

  • Todd

    “It’s Pure Fucking Ecstasy” … Rocco should have that printed on his new Mr. New York business cards !!

    • n24rc

      Sure. He can use a biohazard symbol as a logo, that way he won’t have to disclose status, because it is “apparent” to anyone what a biohazard symbol means are bareback orgies! lol.

    • Cosmic

      Since Rocco does videos geared to the Treasure Island Media crowd I’m guessing his clients would be more into meth than ecstasy.lol

  • John McKee

    Considering that Rocco is open about his HIV+ status what would be the uninformed choice on having him bareback you?

    • Garland

      I read in an interview Rocco did last year that he only works with other positive bottoms or bottoms that are undetectable. So either he’s changed his stance on that or Eli falls into one of those categories.

    • John McKee

      Just to be clear I’m not trying to be a dick, we all make choices about our health, I am well aware of the research of the low risk of transmission of someone that has an extremely low viral load (“undetectable”), especially on PrEP, I can’t say that I would not make the choice to take that risk in a relationship.

      People make their choices, I’m in no place to judge people based on their private sex lives, honestly it’s a small wonder I’m not positive myself, that said let’s not get all high and mighty about personal choices here, this was a business transaction, you knowingly had a positive guy bareback fuck you for a few hundred dollars? Maybe $1,000? I think that is a dumb business transaction, your personal choices are irrelevant. It’s like saying you would accept the idea that Walgreens could be intentionally putting horse dewormer in your allergy medication because your cocaine dealer might.

      • moondoggy

        I don’t follow your point. When you say “it’s a small wonder I’m not positive myself,” is that to imply you’ve had bareback sex without PrEP? Wouldn’t it be a gargantuan step forward to have sex on PrEP with an undetectable top? I hope I don’t come across as accusing. I think that all of us can only benefit from candid conversations about this, so whether we agree or not, I like the fact that you took the time to share an opinion.

        My opinion is that once a guy says he’s poz, most people are guided more by fear than by science. It’s sort of like people who duck below the moving blades of a helicopter even if they’ve stood at their full height under those blades when the chopper was off. The knowledge that the blades will never, never, never be low enough to hurt them just can’t override the instinctive fear. The knowledge that the viral load of an undetectable top will never never never convert a bottom on Truvada just isn’t enough to overcome the emotional view of risk.

        • John McKee

          I’m saying I would help a friend move a sofa up four flights of stairs on a weekend but if my boss asked me to do it and film it I would tell him to fuck the hell off.

          Porn is a business, I simply do not agree with exposing workers to easily avoidable risk. If they want to fuck in private and post the video on xtube that’s fine but I don’t believe in a profit motive to avoidable worker risk.

          • moondoggy

            Oh wow, okay. That’s a whole other thing, then, and none of what I said is quite relevant! lol

            Well, I think a lot of people do get into the business for the fantasy. Nobody fantasizes about moving sofas. So the line is for some a little blurrier than you portray.

    • Zoompietro

      I don’t think I’ve watched anything with Rocco in it but if he’s HIV+ and doing BB porn, that’s really disturbing. I’m not trying to perpetuate a stigma or anything but it’s one thing to promote safe sex where one or both participants has HIV or to promote BB sex where neither participant has HIV (not that I’m advocating for that either), but to depict unprotected sex involving an HIV+ performer seems really irresponsible and fails to acknowledge the fact that that kind of behavior is how the person ended up HIV+ in the first place.

      • dave1984

        “that kind of behavior is how the person ended up HIV+ in the first place” there’s more than 1 transmission route.

        In terms of HIV infection, bareback sex bw HIV + and – carries very minimal risk if meds are appropriately taken by either or both. Not to mention both could be HIV+

        You CAN’T possibly know HIV status of the performers. Saying it’s OK for the HIV- people to have bareback sex on cam but not HIV+ is just gonna lead to more people lying & embarrassed about their status. Who’d wanna to go public about their HIV+ status if they’re gonna be judged ?

        The anti-gay fanatics has been using that same line “do what you want in private, don’t show us.”

        I appreciate you claimed you’re not trying to perpetuate HIV stigma cuz I can’t imagine what it’d be like if you tried to.

        • Zoompietro

          “Saying it’s OK for the HIV- people to have bareback sex on cam but not HIV+”

          My text: “or to promote BB sex where neither participant has HIV (NOT THAT I’M ADVOCATING FOR THAT EITHER)” <—— read that part slowly

          "Who'd wanna to go public about their HIV+ status if they're gonna be judged ?"

          Lesson the first: Reading is FUNDAMENTAL, I never said either was OK. I can refer you to some excellent reading comprehension text if this is something that you continue to struggle with. Furthermore I didn't judge any one's HIV status, I judged the practice of being HIV+ and continuing to participate in unsafe sex practices, the public education system failed you. If you were schooled privately, seek reimbursement.

          "Not to mention both could be HIV+"

          Lesson the second: Both of them being HIV+ is still unsafe since different strands of HIV can combine to create stronger drug resistant strands that your precious meds can not combat. That mindset is apart of the reason that HIV is still such a huge problem in the gay community today, but I see how it's easier for you to pretend that the problem is with people condemning the unsafe practices and not with the people participating in them.

          ""that kind of behavior is how the person ended up HIV+ in the first place" there's more than 1 transmission route."

          Lesson the third: There is more than one transmission route but perhaps you should look into how Rocco got the virus before you go white knighting and making an ass out of yourself.

          As for this "You CAN'T possibly know HIV status of the performers."

          I can possibly (do you know what that word even means, because it's very possible for me to know, please look up what "possibly" means before you misuse it again) know that status because many performers have come out and said it AND there are studios such as Sean Cody that flat out state that their models pass HIV test before having bareback sex (therefore they are not positive. That's how I can possibly (or in this case definitely know).

          Lesson the fourth (and you REALLY need to embrace this one): Think before you speak, it tends to make your arguments stronger and you look like less of an idiot.

          Do with these lesson as you will.

          • dave1984

            LOL.
            1 lesson for you: read medical journals. Bye

          • Zoompietro

            Challenge accepted, you post the links to the reputable medical journals that support your argument and I’ll do the same?

            Side note: Your medical journal challenge only address lesson the second. I see what you tried to do there but I can’t just let you focus in on that one aspect and skirt the fact that your ENTIRE argument was extremely stupid.

      • Are you for real? Many porn actors are HIV+, and their HIV status should not be something they have to reveal to anyone but their scene partners. Because porn is entertainment not education material or real sex that the viewer is having with the actors.

        • Zoompietro

          Did I say he had to reveal his status? I don’t see anywhere where I said that people need to announce their status. Why is it so hard for some of you to actually read? As far as porn not being education material, you’re way off the mark. Good or bad, porn is the main source of sex education for MOST young men (gay or straight). But please, continue to talk out of your ass.

          • Come on now you might not have said it but you sure implied it. Don’t play stupid with me.

          • Zoompietro

            No I didn’t, you inferred it (erroneously) and that’s a consequence of your own stupidity.

    • Rocco also states that he is undetectable which AIDS Map reports that results from the first two years of the PARTNER study have shown that no HIV-positive individual (homosexual or heterosexual) with an undetectable viral load has transmitted HIV:

    • klausrosetoo

      People who do bareback with others while HIV+ means that their partner is also HIV+ whether we know it or not….get it?

  • Dave

    We all know Rocco’s HIV status as positive but I’m assuming he is on medication and is undetectable. Transmission of HIV with someone with an undetectable status is virtually 0. However and again I’m assuming that Eli is also on PREP. If he says he barebacks sometimes in his private life I’m assuming he’s on PREP, I’m not going to assume he’s HIV+ himself & nobody else should. There was pictures from Hustlaball in Las Vegas of Eli with Jed Athens & someone else in a hotel room together having sex & you can pretty much assume that was bareback as well, so if Eli isn’t on PREP at least then he’s being very risky. Of course, none of us should judge if Eli is making informed decisions who he barebacks on screen & knows their status and/or they are tested properly then it shouldn’t be an issue.

    • n24rc

      That is a lot of assumptions for not knowing the persons medical history. Only his doctor could say what would be appropriate. And I imagine his doctor doesn’t advise him to do bareback sex.

    • Zoompietro

      Just because someone makes an “informed decision” doesn’t mean that it is exempt from criticism, an informed decision and a wise decision are not one in the same. Even if it they were, a wise decision isn’t necessarily exempt from criticism either; nothing in this world is.

      • What gives you the right to criticize them though? You’re not fucking with them in person.

        • Zoompietro

          The Constitution gives me that right, same as it gives you the right to say whatever stupid thing that you feel the need to share.

          • The right to be a hater is in what constitution the one in your world? The one where you think you’re better than everyone else so you can go around criticizing others? Delusional is what you are.

          • Zoompietro

            I think you’re the one with the [serious] mental health issue, seeing as you’re having a break down over someone exercising their right to free speech. I can say whatever I want about them and all you can do is throw a bitch fit from behind your screen, but it’s not going to stop me from saying it. Also you lose credibility (not that you had much to start with) when you call someone a hater (who uses that term anymore anyway?) and then call someone delusional, isn’t that the definition of hating?

          • OMG calling someone delusional is not hating. You really are delusional if you think that.

  • n24rc

    I’m more disgusted by the ever presence of pairing models in bareback who don’t match status. I don’t like Rocco, he is a hypocrite and should be avoided in both the escort and porn world. Gay men like him are atrocious and damaging to the community.

    I don’t know, maybe it is me, but the fact that different strands of HIV combine to create super-bugs, and that drug resistance is inevitable from chronic use, I’m pissed the hubris of some people to go bareback.

    And what about other STI’s that PrEP doesn’t prevent or protect against?

    Have you noted the massive amount of straight porn stars with Hepatitis? It has been shown that having multiple STI’s weakens your defenses against HIV. How irresponsible.

    • dave1984

      I don’t bareback in my private life but absolutely hate it when anti-bareback groups just come after HIV+ people with ill-informed facts. If it’s WRONG, it’s wrong for EVERYONE.

      “pairing models in bareback who don’t match status” how you know they dont match status?

      “different strands of HIV combine to create super-bugs” if they don’t match status as you suggested, how can they create superbug??? Even both were HIV+ , super-infection is still very very rare if they had the appropriate care.

      “having multiple STI’s weakens your defenses against HIV” I understand the warts or any condition that compromise the lining can increase risk of HIV infection but that’s really not what “weakens your defenses against HIV” suggests.

      In short, if you are against barebacking, it’s justifiable. But singling out a group based on their HIV status is just like saying it’s OK for straight people to have anal sex but not for the gays.

      • Zoompietro

        “But singling out a group based on their HIV status is just like saying it’s OK for straight people to have anal sex but not for the gays.”

        No it’s not, that’s a false equivalence if I’ve ever seen one. Two HIV+ straight people having unprotected sex poses the same issue, so your argument about straight people is just stupid. Extremely stupid. No one even mentioned straight people, you just kind of pulled that out of your ass to make a weak argument SEEM intelligent but it you failed.

        • dave1984

          Why dont’ you take your own advice & have a lesson in reading comprehension ???

          My statement was referring to his “I’m more disgusted by the ever presence of pairing models in bareback who don’t match status.”

          So you’re the stupid one here.

          • Zoompietro

            I know what you’re comment referred to, what I’m telling you is that your counter argument about straight people is a logical fallacy and didn’t make any sense. Pointing out a disturbance with models being unmatched in HIV status is in no way saying that it’s ok for straight people to have anal sex but not gays, you added that part in because you couldn’t come up with a valid counterpoint. It’s pathetic and lazy, my advice to you would be to make better arguments or none at all until you get the hang of it.

          • n24rc

            That disgust I feel, is because of the complete apathy on the performers parts and the customers of sites that support this content.

          • Cosmic

            It just goes to show that a lot of these guys are fucked up sex addicts that will do anything (including hurt themselves) if it’s in front of a camera and pays enough.

      • n24rc

        None what are you are saying applies. I’m speaking on the merits of condom use and protected sex, regardless of status and PrEP.

        Any justifications for both don’t hold up, especially considering the other forms of STI’s, the problem of combining different strains of HIV, and the usage of pharmaceuticals that are causing super bugs. People selfish and stupid to act in this manor, just use a god damn condom.

  • Ricky

    To each his own but I grew up with porn stars like Joey Stefano, Rex Chandler, Drew Andrews, etc; later guys like Denzel Washington and Matthew Rush emerged. I find Rocco Steele absolutely the most unattractive man ever to appear in gay porn. Again to each his own, but what is offensive is that incredibly handsome African-American and Latino men cannot get porn work and yet Rocco Steele is eveywhere. It does not make sense.

    • Randall

      he’s white and he has a big dick.

    • Cosmic

      I’ve never thought he was attractive but I guess having a big dick trumps looks.

  • Randall

    I couldn’t bareback with someone who is HIV+. He’s got a big dick though and isn’t that all you need in porn?

  • zach

    I can understand being opposed to bareback porn if you are a staunch supporter of safe sex, but criticizing these specific performers and this scene based off assumptions you’re making about one/both of their statuses is extremely misguided.

    There are many gay porn stars who are HIV-positive. Only a handful have been open about their statuses, including Rocco Steele, and to say that he shouldn’t be allowed to perform (with another consenting adult, who’s aware of his status!) because of his status would mean that all HIV-positive performers should be banished from all gay porn, and that’s just not realistic. The fact is, all bareback porn (from Sean Cody to BarebackThatHole) is extremely “unsafe,” but at least in this scene we know for a fact that the two consenting adults have made 100% informed decisions. Isn’t that a good thing?

    If Rocco had kept his HIV status completely private like dozens of other gay porn stars, would that make everyone more comfortable? Maybe we should institute a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in the gay porn industry and just the chips fall where they may? Shit.

    • Dutch Courage

      I just read an interview with Armond Rizzo on your old blog saying that he started doing bb porn because he needed money. The need for money can block out many convincing arguments for practicing safe sex. So you might be informed but still being stupid.

      Is it possible to reverse this bareback trend without shaming performers and studios?

      • McM.

        Nope.

        Studios began using condoms when urged to by national organizations when the community was in crisis. My LGBT history tells me these studios offered very little resistance. People didn’t believe porn would remain “just fantasy” b/c it was being presented to a sex-positive community were gay men were (and still are) in the position to make their sexual fantasies into reality. Also, porn is usually the first, and for some the only, media offering a healthy expression of gay sexuality, and it is used as a learning tool.

        A big difference now is due to a number of factors there is no perception the gay community is in crisis anymore, even with HIV infection rates steadily rising. On top of this, there are a lot of advocates for bareback porn and barebacking. But primarily, it is the shift in health conversations from an individual’s responsibility to others, to an individual’s responsibility to himself. Mind you, this isn’t limited to the LGBT community and HIV, as it is a national shift and we’re just most impacted by one aspect of it. Fifteen years ago people simply didn’t regularly discuss a man’s “informed choice” to fuck bareback (outside of a relationship) as it was firmly understood his personal choice affected others. Nowadays, it seems like a pretty natural debate.

        B/c any push to reverse the bareback trend will bring up the concerns of a larger community, I believe shame will always be involved when those pushing-back are presented or viewed as a subversive element. Unfortunately, I have no clue on how to fix that.

    • Zoompietro

      “That the two consenting adults have made 100% informed decisions. Isn’t that a good thing?”

      Being informed about a decision doesn’t make it a good decision. It’s like people who don’t believe in vaccinations for their children, they say that they’re making an informed decision but then a measles outbreak happens and not only does their kid get it but because their kid never built up a resistance to it, it creates a super strain of measles that is resistant to the immunization and now everyone is at risk. Is that a good thing even though the original decision was informed?

      “I can understand being opposed to bareback porn if you are a staunch supporter of safe sex, but criticizing these specific performers and this scene based off assumptions you’re making about one/both of their statuses is extremely misguided.”

      There is no assumption about Rocco’s status, he has HIV. So there’s nothing misguided about saying that the portrayal of him having bareback sex is problematic. It’s no different than the practices of TIM, which you’ve been so critical of when two consenting adults were making an informed decision.

      “If Rocco had kept his HIV status completely private like dozens of other gay porn stars, would that make everyone more comfortable? Maybe we should institute a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in the gay porn industry and just the chips fall where they may?”

      I think the discomfort is coming from his continued practice of bareback sex while HIV+ and not with his status in and of itself. I could be off base here but it sounds like you’re saying that because he’s open about his status, we shouldn’t be critical of him for having bareback sex. The extremist bit at the end about the “don’t ask, don’t tell” seems more like a scare tactic along the lines of, “don’t critique the openly HIV+ performers or they’re going to start keeping it a secret and something bad will happen!” than an actual argument.

      Just my two cents.

      • Texas Top

        “So there’s nothing misguided about saying that the portrayal of him having bareback sex is problematic.”

        Problematic for whom? Their personal choices do not affect you. Eli made a choice about his own life, as did Rocco. Neither concerns you. It baffles me why you would care much less call their consensual actions “problematic.” Nanny-state much?

        “To depict unprotected sex involving an HIV+ performer seems really irresponsible and fails to acknowledge the fact that that kind of behavior is how the person ended up HIV+ in the first place.”

        If you feel bareback sex is irresponsible, maybe your best decision would be to ignore the posts on a GAY PORN BLOG about bareback. It’s pretty clear you have an HIV-phobia – no need to confirm your hate to the rest of the world.

        • Zoompietro

          “It’s pretty clear you have an HIV-phobia – no need to confirm your hate to the rest of the world.”

          How exactly is that pretty clear? I’m pretty sure that I only ever said that my problem was with the depiction of unsafe sex, never with HIV+ people. Disapproving of a practice is not the same as disapproving of a group of people, I don’t see how you drew that conclusion. So if you would, PLEASE point out one post where I stated that I had a problem with HIV, I’ll wait…..

          “If you feel bareback sex is irresponsible, maybe your best decision would be to ignore the posts on a GAY PORN BLOG about bareback.”

          I can comment on whatever the fuck I want to, if you don’t like it maybe your best decision would be to ignore my post. Funny how that works isn’t it?

          “Problematic for whom? Their personal choices do not affect you.”

          Take a basic biology class and then come back to me after you learn how infectious disease transmission impacts the world as viruses and bacterium become resistant to modern medicine. If you don’t have the capacity to take the class, just ask your doctor to tell you all about it. You sound like a little bit of education would do you good.

      • dave1984

        “I think the discomfort is coming from his continued practice of bareback sex while HIV+ and not with his status in and of itself. ”
        Is it less of a discomfort for you if 2 HIV- people having bareback sex?

        • Zoompietro

          My text: “or to promote BB sex where neither participant has HIV (NOT THAT I’M ADVOCATING FOR THAT EITHER)” <—— read that part slowly.

          Again, I never said that but keep searching for that straw man honey.

          • dave1984

            lol it’s a simple yes/no question.

      • Two Cents

        Thats what I have been saying to all of these people that say that I am an “informed barebacker.” Just because you’re informed doesnt mean your decision automatically becomes wise. Gilead says wear a condom with PrEP. CDC says wear a condom even with a low viral load. If they say to use it and you dont then youre not being wise off top or acting appropriately on the information you learned.

    • Pascal

      Uh? So Zach has reversed his position on his ‘worst of’ list of 2013 where Duckface was proudly declared (and I quote) “responsible for possibly the most retarded (not to mention dangerous) STD safety protocol of all time: “Informed Barebacking.“. I really thought he was going to call out Mr Lewis on that during the interview.

      And I don’t understand how he can bemoan the lack of gay oversight from the FSC which enforces a ban on straight HIV+ performers who are effectively black-listed while at the same time defending the right of Mr Steele to perform bareback.

      This is very hypocritical confusing.

      • zach

        I’m sorry that you are continually confused and looking for hypocrisy when there is none. It would still be dangerous for a studio/employer to say it’s going to keep its performers HIV negative by serosorting and pairing them up based solely on what the performers claim to be their status (with no testing), which was the context of the Duckface thing. Two individual performers making an informed decision between themselves (one of whom’s status is already known) is a completely different thing, and it may very well be a bad, dangerous decision, but it’s not the policy of an entire company responsible for employee safety. If you think these two things are the same, you’re the one who’s retarded.

        • Pascal

          And about the FSC thing?

          • zach

            no idea what you’re talking about, but that organization has a shitload of problems.

    • n24rc

      I think you are talking around in circles.

      There are two issues you do touch on in a round about way: “all bareback porn is unsafe.” Correct!!! My point exactly, but I also take it further with the problem of two poz guys having sex. It is important that two HIV positive performers use protection as combination strains of HIV are developing because poz people aren’t using condoms.

      That status “closet” thing isn’t applicable here. The problem is the irresponsible behaviors and general apathy the community has shown towards bareback sex and superbugs. Rocco’s interviews and prior discussions on the topic have shown both his apathy towards the problem, and his irresponsible behaviors towards his health. You can look up his interviews and talk about his misperception about HIV transmission, which caused his condition since he thought it was “Safe.” It is history repeating with this guy.

  • Halnova

    “I educate myself, I ask questions, and I have conversations with my partners about our HIV statuses and STI screenings”…my problem with this statement (in general; not just in reference to the scene above)is that men lie. And unless your buddy got tested and got the “all clear” right before you fuck each other…you should err on the side of caution and not believe him. Until there is a cure….wrap your dick up. Not trying to be holier than thou it’s just one of my personal policies.

  • Drew Barrymore

    That attitude “I’m HIV+ but I’m on medication so I can breed everyone” is totally irresponsable. Most of models perform bareback because they need money, promote unsafe sex with HIV+ models is just taking advantages of human misery. HIV+ models should perform with condoms, the porn industry has its role to play in prevention.
    Same with Duckface Entertainment. No, you can not just be like “whatever, i’m on prep”, viruses can mutate and HIV is mutating right now because of unconscious models like Rocco Steele or Michael Lucas.

    I have much more respect for Tim Kruger now. He’s not HIV+ but his partner is, so he decided to perform safe sex with his models. That’s called responsability.

    • GayPupCub24

      I agree !!!!!!!!!

  • Cosmic

    Things like this are just further proof that the gay community is it’s own worst enemy.

  • Stephen C.

    Eli Lewis looks fresh off the boat from Manilla or Guam or something. I’ve always been into asians but his face just isn’t hot (..and those eyebrows don’t help). If I wanted to watch Imelda Marcos get fucked, I would just replay her arrest on Youtube over and over.

  • Nickolas

    HIV or not, I think Rocco Steele is the hottest porn daddy around. MUCH hotter than the boring and creepy Dirk Caber.

    http://i.imgur.com/EzmrIMj.gif

  • andrew

    Rocco Steele is not very easy on the eyes.

  • Casey Scott

    So I guess Eli’s never hard throughout the entire scene? Yep, that’s ecstasy for ya!

  • AussieB

    He’s an adult and can make his choices, but I wonder how any gay boys will get infected with HIV or contract other STDs by watching porn films like these. I still don’t understand how the condom ruins your fantasy when youre watching porn. in 99.99% of the movies, you barely even see the condoms – the magically appear like Lucky Charms. I much prefer the films where they actually eroticize the putting of the condom on , and show people how to put them on correctly and incorporate them into sex, love making or whatever youre doing. Whether you want to admit it or not, you may not be a role model (most parents don’t want their kids to grow up doing porn where they become expendable) b ut the truth is people watch porn to fantasize but also get educated about gay sex. BAREBACK THAT HOLE already tells us this is not a studio producing romantic beautiful love making between gay men but wham bam get you off and go to the next one.

  • da90027

    Eli and Armond Rizzo are both poz. Big deal…it’s not brain surgery to figure that out. Many performers in condom porn are poz too but because they use condoms on screen they don’t suffer the same hypocritical criticism. Personally I think all these so called fans or gossip queens need to get another hobby if all they have to do is come on these blogs and go on and on forever about porn. Quite a todo and fuss considering most just jack off to a 2 minute clip anyway and go about their day.