Jakob Fucks Blake Bareback In Sean Cody Return To Form

Posted February 22, 2017 by with 37 comments

563A1281Good Sean Cody is back, bitches. Thank God, the nightmare video issues seen throughout most of Sean Cody’s scenes this month appear to be fixed in their scene being released tonight, as you’ll see in the trailer below.

563A1300As Sean Cody employee David explained last week, the studio’s “awful” videos with horrific colors and frame rate issues were due to new equipment “not being adapted to filming needs” (whatever that even means), and they’ve since gone back to their original cameras. In the trailer for tonight’s scene, starring Blake and newcomer Jakob, I can’t notice any obvious color or playback problems, so we might be able to enjoy (and actually watch!) this scene. We’ll know for sure when the entire video is here at 9pm.

563A1102Blake is a reliable bottom, so he should be fine tonight. There’s something sexy about Jakob’s overall look, but I’m not sure if I’m a fan. If he fucks well tonight and shoots big loads, I’ll be here for him.

scback

Trailer (watch full scene here):

[Sean Cody: Jakob Fucks Blake Bareback]

 

  • Dale Bergman

    http://i.imgur.com/U1PHT7H.gif

    The cinematography in this scene still looks below par.

    • Zachary Sire

      Yeah, I just compared to a few scenes released years ago, which were better. This is definitely not as good as the 2013-2016 scenes.

      • Dale Bergman

        Let’s hope that Sean Cody gets their act together. I think that this scene is one of those “couple of scenes” that David mentioned in his statement about the “awful” quality. It doesn’t look as bad as the other botched scenes.

      • D.P. Welles

        Didn’t people say it wasn’t just the cameras at fault but that seemingly new people were shooting and or editing? Unless they got the old crew back with the old cameras…

        • Dale Bergman

          I just watched the scene and there’s definitely something off. Compare the Deacon and Asher scene to this scene. The Blake and Jakob scene lacks Sean Cody’s usually crisp, naturalistic cinematography. There’s a golden tint (indoors) that makes everything blend in together. Flesh tones are off as well. It’s not as problematic, unwatchable as the Randy/Joey, Brandon/Joe, Shaw/Jess scenes. Sean Cody may have tweaked the remaining botched scenes after the complaints from their customers.

          • Dale Bergman

            At the beginning of this scene:

          • Kevin

            Got it from John Tegan.

          • Dale Bergman

            I enjoy his reviews.

          • Kevin

            When someone mailed them about it, they replied a couple but a couple means two and this is now the fourth? update with issues. Because they show the disclaimer i am going to assume we have to endure this for several more scenes otherwise they would not show it.

          • Dale Bergman

            https://media.giphy.com/media/pvO8ugi72HKww/giphy.gif

            Sean Cody isn’t being honest. Jakob/Blake, Vance, Jess/Shaw, Brandon/Joe, Jakob, Randy/Joey, and Nathaniel all had that “awful” picture quality. I wonder how many more of these “couple of scenes” are left.

          • Kevin

            Depends on when the editor found out. He probably had several films that were shot waiting on his desk to be edited. You just listed 7 scenes, let’s just double that and make it 14. They might not even release these faulty scenes one after another, we could get one scene that was properly filmed and a week later one of those shitty ones

          • Dale Bergman

            I think Sean Cody should just release all of the faulty scenes after each other and get it over with. I hope there’s not six more botched scenes left.

          • Kevin

            Exactly, or release them instead instead of solo or release them on a Tuesday. I think it is actually outragious that they expect us to pay for them.

  • Dana Rimons

    Lmao @ this new dude.

    • Dale Bergman

      I think Jakob is a cutie and I love his swimmer’s body (the hair between his pecs is hot). I expect him to be timid in his first few scenes because he seems very shy (I find shy men sexy). I really like him.

      • Mike Julius

        Disgusted = shy now? lol Okay

        • Dale Bergman

          I watched this scene and Jakob was hard as a rock the entire time. He wasn’t disgusted fucking Blake’s great ass.

          • Mike Julius

            Are you really unaware of the difference between a physiological response and a psychological response or?

          • Dale Bergman

            I watched the scene and Jakob didn’t look disgusted fucking Blake. That’s my perception. I’m done trying to speculate these performers sexuality. I’m good with Jakob as long as he continues to bring that hard cock to every scene he’s in. It was great watching a scene on this site without a lot of edits because of the top’s obvious wood issues.

          • Mike Julius

            I’m not even commenting on his sexuality directly. Personally, I don’t
            have a problem with g4p performers, as long as they perform. Popping a
            viagra off camera and sticking his dick in something is the absolute
            bare minimum.

          • Dale Bergman

            I was satisfied with Jakob’s first performance. I’m also not going to assume how he maintained a hard as a rock cock throughout the same.

            “Popping off viagra off camera and sticking his dick in something is absolute bare minimum.”

            Then why do so many performers have trouble maintaining an erection during an entire scene? I remember a documentary about straight male porn performers and they stated that the Viagra in “G4P” is bullshit. One performer said that he tried to do gay porn (because the money is better) and he couldn’t get hard during the scene (even with Viagra). They also said that these scenes take hours with breaks. I have never taken Viagra and tried to have sex with the gender that I’m not attracted. I’m sure it would be even more difficult to maintain one for hours in front of camera.

          • Mike Julius

            Okay, cool, but however he maintained a hardon, that aint enough for me, but I’m genuinely glad for you that you can get off on scraps like this. But to me, the reason why gay porn isn’t what it used to be is because so many are willing to tolerate this less than mediocre bull.

            Question: if during SC’s heyday a model with this face pulled this no mouth policy, what would the subscribers say do you think?

          • Dale Bergman

            To each his own. I actually dislike a lot of the supposedly “great” scenes. I do want to see Jakob reciprocate if he returns. A top with a hard cock in gay porn is vital for me. The squeeze the dick and stick it in is a total boner killer for me. I don’t mind if a bottom has erection fluctuations while he gets fucked (as long as he’s not flaccid throughout).

            I honestly don’t care what other subscribers would say. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure. I used to read a lot of vicious comments about a lot of the models on Sean Cody a few years ago. They used to state that Randy was “unworthy” to be on Sean Cody because of his face (“horseface” was his nickname). I would never state that a performer is unworthy based on his appearance because looks are subjective. I also remember reading complaints about Stu not sucking cock. They used to call Abe “ugly” and state that his cock was “too small”. The list goes on and one. Jack (a very popular SC model that you find “ugly”) didn’t suck in his first few scenes. I think he’s one of the best performers on the site now.

            When was Sean Cody’s supposed heyday? I have been watching a lot of Sean Cody’s scenes from the early 2000’s and I’m not impressed with a lot of performers (I find them average looking). I think Jakob is cute and I really like his body.

          • Mike Julius

            https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xs8PRlI7ey5CuI/source.gif

            If you genuinely don’t think Jakob would have been heckled off the site during Sean Cody’s Golden Age, then I really don’t have anything more to say about this.

          • Dale Bergman

            Again, to each his own and looks are subjective. People that wanted Jack and Randy off the site. When I’m not a fan of a performer I skip their scenes (unless I REALLY like their scene partner). I’m not going to act like a brat and demand them off the site because I personally don’t find them attractive or I dislike them as a performer. Others can enjoy him (they may dislike my favorite performers). I remember reading a lot of vicious comments about performers during Sean Cody’s “Golden Age”. I find Jakob more attractive than a lot of the performers from 2000-2013. These performers shouldn’t allow differing opinions to deter them. No performer should leave a site because he read some vicious comments.

            Jakob is only the second new model to break 100 likes this year. The viewing numbers for his scenes are solid as well. That’s all that matters to Sean Cody.

  • Mike Julius

    Dude looks like someone cursed him to smell various farts for all time.

    • FooFight

      Indeed. Jacob looks as if he’s posing in the middle of a sulfur plant. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/575c44a4826d1b44908a2e6390bd21d63d2d6aeb3c47923f801da5df79cad94b.gif

    • Hudsonman

      Yes it does. I call that “REINCE PRIEBUS MOUTH.” When Reince speaks it looks like he’s eating a big bowl of poo. We must remember these two were born that way.

      On the other hand… Jakob’s problem touching or sucking cock and for that matter kissing should be a disqualifier. “Eww, it ‘smells’ salty!”

      SHOULD WE BE GIVING GAY/BI $$$ TO STR8 CLOSET CASES?

      • Dale Bergman

        Jakob touched Blake’s cock during the scene and was fully hard the entire time. I agree that he needs to reciprocate and kiss his scene partner if he returns.

        • Mike Julius

          He touched it?! Wow. Yay.

          • Dale Bergman

            LOL! It’s a start.

    • hotsweetspot

      Agree with you Mike. Why are we watching this creep having gay sex after what he had to say about it on camera? He has a great body and very attractive dick but his face is not very attractive as it expresses his sneer at gay sex. Blake did an heroic job of acting to get along with him.

  • WhimsyCotton

    Blake is looking daddy af here. That beefy yoga ass of his looks as amazing as ever. As for the new guy, I don’t know if his nose gives him character or makes his face look weird…

  • BjorkNut

    Is it me, or, is Blake starting to look a little worn. I mean he is still a bit of a cutie, but, SC might want to put him out to pasture sooner than later. Or, maybe they can move him over to Bromo or Men.com like they did for Dennis.

    • Dale Bergman

      I think Blake looks great. His body is on point (his ass is amazing).

  • S .

    “No sparks. No kissing. Jacob was blah. Blake seemed bored.”

    Roger Ebert.

  • Jon

    Jakob looks like one of those “no kissing” guys, wonder if he does kiss or suck dick.