Former Gay Porn Star Blu Kennedy Arrested For Possession Of “Hundreds” Of Child Porn Images And Videos

Posted May 11, 2017 by with 223 comments

derdFormer gay porn star Blu Kennedy was arrested in San Francisco yesterday after the SFPD’s Internet Crimes Against Children unit discovered “hundreds” of child porn files on his electronic devices, Str8UpGayPorn can confirm. Kennedy’s roommate—a UCSF psychiatrist named Billy Lockhart, who graduated from Yale—was also arrested for possessing child porn, as well as uploading/sharing it online via UCSF wi-fi.

Kennedy’s mug shot is above, and he’s identified by his real name, Benjamin Martin, in the below report from SF Gate:

A 36-year-old UCSF psychiatrist and his roommate were arrested with hundreds of images and videos of child pornography, officials said Thursday.

Billy Lockhart, a resident at UCSF’s Department of Psychology and graduate of Yale University’s School of Medicine, was arrested on Tuesday at his home near the hospital on 100 block of Buena Vista Terrace, police said.

The San Francisco Police Department’s Internet Crimes Against Children Unit started looking at Lockhart in March after investigators determined he was uploading and trading child pornography on the Internet, officials said. Lockhart was using the UCSF Wi-Fi to upload child pornography, police said.

On Tuesday, police said they served a search warrant at Lockhart’s home, where they found several of his electronic devices containing hundreds of videos and pictures of child porn.

Benjamin Martin, Lockhart’s 33-year-old roommate, also had hundreds of files containing child porn on his devices, officials said.

Lockhart and Martin were arrested at the home. Each suspect was booked on suspicion of possession of more than 600 files of child pornography, and Lockhart was additionally booked on suspicion of distribution of child pornography.

While the SF Gate report identifies Martin and Lockhart as “roommates,” Str8UpGayPorn can confirm that Martin and Lockhart have been boyfriends for the past year. Photos of the couple via Martin’s Facebook:

artin 17990707_10154480539683342_926778703792470502_nBenjamin Martin (a.k.a. Blu Kennedy) was an extremely well known gay adult performer and model from 2006 to 2012, appearing in over 80 scenes and movies for over a dozen gay adult companies. He remains in custody tonight in San Francisco, with bond set at $115,000.

ADDED:

Now a day after the SFPD’s arrest, Martin is no longer listed as an inmate in the city or county of San Francisco, indicating he’s likely posted bond and been released. And, his Facebook page has gone private.

ueks

 

  • nick

    oh no, I really liked him.

    • Jason

      Me too. I hope he didnt do it, but if he did, i hope he spends a lot of time in jail

    • TheSagaOf

      Same here. :(

    • AJMAC

      same reaction, so sad he was like my dream boyfriend….

  • love star

    Not surprising, with that mug shot he looks like one and like his name should be Jim.

  • OverKill

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9a462966604d3d375bcb186d2a43b030bec2a831965289effb240ff6f76fb560.gif

    Fucking gross and anybody would have guessed right off with that mug shot. IDK how those images can turn anyone on. It’s just …. words can’t describe how depraved that is.

  • sxg

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8b2785b98b68b3e301c16635746fce54d4175a960140f7d6ff0e98d402376cc8.gif
    After he spent that time in porn aging and adding muscle mass for me to finally enjoy him in his scenes, I now have to be reminded of this every time I see him???

    Actually perusing through the very little he has available on Facebook there’s this.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c1c915014f370ab8a84ff0b358b5c2498438382598872e610f39f4b21d843ea4.png
    Thank you ginger pedophile. Knowing you’re a Berniebot cunt makes me feel less sorry for you when your cellmates double fist rape you. Enjoy your anal fissures for the rest of your life!
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ffa973a86f8802f306ad9fa839186de43c802bfe7667c5f8ac89dc9857be8ef0.gif

    • Eric

      He is not only a pedophile…this FB post indicates he is an idiot!

      • sxg

        If you look at the ones who liked his post, you’ll notice at least one of them is also a former pornstar! Blu may have blocked his friends list, but likes, comments and shares are forever!

        • FrenchBug

          From a quick browse, I spot three actually.

          • sxg

            3??? Damn you know your pornstars better than I do.

          • FrenchBug

            Not sure if that’s a compliment or not, tbh. lol

          • sxg

            Sadly there’s no DM with disqus or else I’d ask you who you recognized besides the obvious one! Well it was obvious to me at least lol

          • Ninja0980

            I saw a couple of them as well.
            Wonder how they feel right now.

        • Isiah

          We don’t know what ages of the victims are yet I wish the article tell the age of the victims. Sometimes when this happens they always tell the ages of the victims

    • James Johnson III

      And a post like this makes him a Bernie supporter how? Once you’re done answering that, even if he is a Bernie supporter, that means he deserves to be gangraped in prison?! You don’t have to agree with someone’s politics but that’s just going beyond

      • sxg

        He deserves what he gets in prison for dealing with child porn. Being a berniebot is kind of icing on the cake. Since you’re so sympathetic to people who enjoy child porn maybe you can be his first prison penpal! Don’t forget to send him pics of shirtless boys when you send him letters he’ll greatly appreciate it.

        • James Johnson III

          WTF?! Bernie supporter = child predator? And because I actually don’t make ridiculous unfounded leaps like “political affiliation = child porn purveyor” somehow that means I support people who watch and trade child porn? I would say that logic is ridiculous if I actually believed it was logic at all. Awesome Ad Hominem attack there. Rather then actually discuss the point I made, you slander and attack me. Thank you for proving why it is considered a logical fallacy.

          • Justin Trenton #NotMyPresident

            During the primary quite a few democrats were paranoid of Bernie due to his early years. He wrote several pervy articles and once paid to keep a child molestation case quiet. This is the reason he didn’t want to release his tax returns. He could still have been innocent. It’s common for politics to pay to keep a case quiet because guilty or innocent, his name being associated with pedophilia would destroy him. Had he won the nomination, you know Trump would have gone there.

          • James Johnson III

            Okay I didn’t know this… and it’s awful if true. But, not knowing this and supporting Bernie does not mean that I (or anyone else who supports Bernie) support people who watch/trade child porn as was implied, y’know?

          • La Bambi

            No he didn’t. Stop posting uncited smears. The sitting president is a rapist and ex-President Bill Clinton is one too. There’s enough actual rapists in politics without you smearing someone who isn’t.

          • Justin Trenton #NotMyPresident

            A smear? Its over. He’s too old to ever run again. I’m saying what was reported back then. The month and year it happened was posted also. It was the same year he wrote those sexual articles. You don’t think it was a odd that he didn’t release his tax returns? We know why Trump didn’t want to do it. But, Bernie? Eventually he released a few years, but left out the year in question. He obviously had something to hide. In the US anyone can sue you over anything. A lady said Bernie molested her son. For all we know that lady could have been full of BS. It makes sense that Bernie would quietly settle to avoid it getting out and ruining him because even if its a total lie, it plants seeds of doubt. All the details and then Bernie not wanting to release his taxes made the story seem real. But, we’ll never know since his political career is pretty much over due to age.

          • Pinko of the Grange

            Actually he only released 2014. Are you trying to get us to infer that Bernie was raping little boys every other year?

          • Pinko of the Grange

            “once paid to keep a child molestation case quiet.” I can’t even find a fake news article that is even close to this. Do you have a legit source?

    • Knightgee

      Hillary is at best a political opportunist who took ages to support marriage equality when it was politically convenient and just this past year stood up at Nancy Reagan’s funeral and claimed that a woman who was complicit in allowing and erasing the deaths of thousands of gay men was a champion of HIV education. So I’m not sure how this Facebook post proves anything about his character or who he voted for? If anything, it shows that when it came to at least one issue he had some basic sense.

      • Ninja0980

        Bernie lied about his LGBT record as well but I digress, his political viewpoints have nothing to do with this.

  • Eric

    So happy when these pedophiles get busted…they make me sick.

    • Luca

      Frankly, a guy that jerks off over pics of 16 years old is far from being a pedophile.
      (I think in this case is more serious than that, though)

      • FrenchBug

        Seriously, can you not go there? It is illegal, period, so you are not going to win this argument.

        • Luca

          Let’s start from the beginning. Why is being a pedophile bad, a sexual perversion? It’s because you feel sexual arousal/attraction towards targets to which you shouldn’t because not sexual beings. In the case of pedophilia, prepubescent children/young teens.

          Then there is clearly the desire of the law to protect a category without too many ambiguities and hence the age limit – not too mention that in case of sexual relationships there is also the psychological aspect and teens are usually vulnerable from that point of view even well after puberty.

          I’m not contesting the law, I’m saying that there is no psychological perversion in fantasizing over a fully sexually grown body.

          • asby
          • The reason we protect teenagers and children with laws like this is because they haven’t matured enough to give informed consent. Plain and simple.

          • peter

            As someone who dodged a pedophile or two in my early to mid teens, there’s nothing quite so creepy as being sexually objectified by a man at least twice your age, especially if you’re gay and coming to grips with your own sexuality. For that reason, I think gay youth is especially vulnerable. I have friends who were sexually abused by older men. They use lines like “if you try it and you don’t like it, then you’ll know you’re not gay” followed with some horseshit about Plato and the Greeks.

          • Delirious D

            but you sexually objectify boys more than half your age all the time..because somehow you think you’re still in the same league as these 18 year olds

          • La Bambi

            Stay the fuck away from underage kids! This is exactly the self-serving rationale I’ve heard from abusers time and time again. FUCK OFF.

          • Ben

            ???????????????

            @zacharysire:disqus can you report this person… look up his IP address and call the police. I’m not joking!!

          • Zachary Sire

            I’ve deleted the comments and blocked him. His commenting profile showed a series of strange comments on several websites.

          • n24rc

            Can’t you just block all IP traffic from east Europe and China. Can’t we just kick the two countries off the internet? Would we really benefit culturally from their participation in it? Lol.

          • Rational Thinker

            Europe’s not a country honey.

      • Jerking off over pictures of a 16 year old is EXACTLY what being a pedophile means.

        • Well, technically that’s ephebephilia, but it’s still fucked up.

          • Pinko of the Grange

            Always like the use of proper word.

    • Agreed. I hope he’s prosecuted with the full extent of the law, registers as a sex offender, and gets help.

      • nick

        But he wont get help will he, that’s not how the us prison system works.

        • Goodboy

          You can’t help a pediphile other then keeping a watch on them and locking them away if they break any rules.

          • nick

            I thought there were “treatments” that could help, and it is a mental illness isn’t it, it’s certainly not normal behavior.

    • Goodboy

      Ha. Someone actually down voted that. Seems common sense to me.

  • Justin Trenton #NotMyPresident

    The only problem I have is that they are not listing it as child porn of boys under 16/14. That child porn could be 17 yr olds that were on his Tumblr. Those images they talk about might not be saved on their devices on purpose, they could be saved pics that were on their phone’s RAM from Tumblr. Quite a few times I’ll follow someone on Tumblr that posts a hot pic, then later on they start to add pics of younger looking boys. I quickly unfollow, but I wonder how many guys just see those pics as “twinks.” You can see in Helix that a lot of 18 yr olds can look much younger. Their child porn could simply be twink pics from Tumblr they thought was legal. To be safe, I don’t follow any twink blogs on Tumblr because you can never be sure of their age.

    • FrenchBug

      Come on! The only possible explanation where BM is not a creep that I’d accept that somehow this was all the boyfriend’s. We shall see.
      The police does not arrest you for liking Tumblr pics. They are clearly indicating child porn material was being actively exchanged and traded. And at that level, it is not an “accident”

      • Justin Trenton #NotMyPresident

        I read an article online about a guy that arrested over images he had on his phones RAM. Wouldn’t rebloging an image on Tumblr count as “actively exchanging and trading” images?

        If he had true child porn, then he’s a creep. But, I’d like to know more before the guy is crucified since 17 yr olds that look 18 count as child porn. Had he met young boys, that’s one thing. But the whole “imagines on his phone thing” makes me give him the benefit of the doubt.

        • FrenchBug

          Not as far as the FBI is concerned no. They wouldn’t TRACE back someone who is reblogging Tumblr pictures.
          Listen, I agree about being cautious about hanging him in the court of public opinion without details but honestly I fail to see many plausible explanations that would totally exonerate him.
          And that one absurd story from Britain you are referring to sounds like a very flimsy reason to assume his innocence is more plausible than the unfortunately more realistic and upsetting likelihood that he is indeed a pedophile. Chances are very very high than it is the latter.

        • n24rc

          That’s why I think this is Grindr activity or something like that, because RAM keeps all those files despite deleting them.

          • FrenchBug

            Why are they sharing the nude pics of other people on Grindr? How many pictures of “I-did-not-know-he-was” 17yo do they have anyway? (and it is illegal anyway so it is not a get-out-of-jail-free card)

          • n24rc

            I can’t tell from the report if it’s a file sharing service which focuses on child porn OR a hookup app with underage users sending pics. Again, the distinctions are important to note.

            A lot of gay guys are labeled predators and child molestors, I’m a bit hesitant to label them myself since people tend to lack objectivity depending on the reasons: gay, porn star, etc.

          • FrenchBug

            I am not sure that making a lot of excuses for someone caught in that kind of situation is the best way to combat that unfair stereotype.

          • n24rc

            No one is making excuses here. Just questioning the merits of the case. Besides, FrenchBug the only person here who is argumentative about this is you.

          • moondoggy

            Who is making excuses? You say you agree about “being cautious,” but your comments lean more toward “this is why he is dead to me now.” Unless @n24rc:disqus is the prosecuting attorney, I don’t think that discussing his potential innocence and/or degrees of guilt is morally irresponsible.

            Totally not chiding you for your opinion, not even saying you’re wrong. I’m only saying you seem to have formed a more complete condemnatory judgment than you acknowledge.

          • FrenchBug

            I am saying that the scenarios suggested here and there in this thread make no sense. But you and n24rc are right that there is no point for me to drive this further into the ground.
            I admit I really do not like enabling the idea that somehow gay men can “innocently” stumble upon a child pornography arrest because I think it plays into all kinds of ugly stereotypes. But indeed no point in arguing further.
            I don’t think I have heard an explanation that I find plausible BUT I have not heard many details about what he is accused of either.
            And in the end, I sincerely hope I am wrong to be cynical.

          • Grinder is not going to have 700 photos of underage boys.

            California has some pretty Victorian rules about the age of consent. 18 may be fine for p*** but 16 would seem to me to be the biological age most people are capable of consenting.

            The legal age of sexual consent in Canada is 16 . The law includes a “close-in-age exception,” meaning 14- and 15-year-olds can have sex with someone who is less than five years older.
            That said if you are a 36 year old man dreaming of sex with 16 year olds there’s something not quite right in your wiring

        • The straightforward problem with that idea is that in a criminal charge you have to be proven guilty Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. Incidental download would certainly be reasonable doubt and therefore no criminal charge would stick. Where incidental download transcend’s Reasonable Doubt is in a situation where hundreds of photos are on your temporary folders from different dates and different sites

    • Zachary Sire

      They’re innocent until proven guilty, but I think a big part of these
      cases is that prosecutors have proof of clear intent on the part of the
      suspects, and that the suspects knew exactly what they were doing with
      the illegal content. Also, this case doesn’t appear to be based on
      Tumblr likes or a reblog…but actively requesting/sharing/uploading hundreds of
      images/videos, and saving them to hard drives.

      • n24rc

        So you base your conclusions on the report of file sharing? Wouldn’t file sharing in apps count? Like Grindr? Or WhatsApp?

        • FrenchBug

          The article says “possession of over 600 files of child pornography”. That’s quite the collection to have of people that he didn’t know were 17yo and not 18yo. Come on !

      • Isiah

        Please update this story

      • Luca

        Yes, I guess they don’t really move their ass for a search warrant just for a bunch of pics of 17y.o…

        • Isiah

          But the cops can have a search warrant if the images were 14 years ago or 15 years ago boys

          • FrenchBug

            Good. BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL AND WRONG AND SICK. I mean, do you guys hear yourself?

    • Jace

      The cops had probably infiltrated private forums where child porn is traded. You don’t just upload and distribute this stuff on Tumblr or through email, unless you’re a complete idiot. Although, this guy used UCSF’s wi-fi, so I’m guessing he got into Yale as a legacy student. Yikes.

      • Ninja0980

        Arrogance makes you stupid.
        IMO, he had probably gotten away with it for so long he didn’t think twice about thinking he could get away with by using WCSF’s wi-fi.

        • FrenchBug

          I actually think he might have thought using the UCSF’s WiFi would make it harder to trace that stuff back to him – as in, since so many people use the same IP address… Something like that.

          • Pinko of the Grange

            Unless the logs catch the mac address of the wifi card.

          • FrenchBug

            I didn’t say it was a good idea – nothing is untraceable. I am just thinking that might have been why he went that route even if it proved (from what I understand) to be his downfall.

          • Pinko of the Grange

            i read to fast some time. Missed the obvious point of view the comment was written from.

  • Ricky

    I loathed him with the heat of 1,000 suns. This does not surprise me at all – I always found him creepy and, at best, churlish. He also looks like crap in that photo.

    • FrenchBug

      Considering I liked him as a performer and actually had heard only good things about him from other performers and some community circles we had in common (which is I am stunned!), I would love for you to expand on this. So that I feel a bit less terrible about this.

      • Ricky

        Believe me I sympathize with you – I hate it when a porn star – or even a regular performer whose work one admires – turns out to be so… damaged. However to answer your question, I have no specific knowledge or personal experience. However he really did creep me out. Something about his eyes always seemed off to me; which was annoying because he was in like every other film for a while back when he was in his glory days.

        • Hereweare

          I agree. I always thought he was very hot. I love redheads. But then…….there were those “crazy eyes”. I don’t know I would have ever guessed this, but to hear that he’s damaged isn’t shocking to me.

      • Ninja0980

        I know quite a few folks as well and I agree with you in that this was NOT a name I expected to ever see in something like this.
        Just goes to show you can never tell.

  • DrunkEnough

    He may well be guilty, but it is profoundly unfair of the police to release an arrest attached to a crime like this if there hasn’t been an actual conviction.

  • Xzamilloh

    Goddammit, am I gonna have to delete ALL of my porn in a few years??? FUCK!!!

  • n24rc

    It may simply be gay teens who sexually solicit Blu with stuff – and he’s stupid enough to keep those pics. I’ve talked with other porn actors who get solicited by under age fans and they have to constantly block or delete them online for fear of this kind of thing going on.

    I just don’t see the two of them being interested in prepubescent children.

    • FrenchBug

      The boyfriend was TRADING material. Are we assuming Blu’s arrest was for unrelated material that wasn’t “as bad”? I agree about being cautious about immediately hanging him in the court of public opinion but so far all the “theories” sound like grasping at straws.

      And I am stunned because Blu K. had always seemed like one of the most level-headed porn performers out there but you need to rethink that last sentence. There is no warning sign or “telling” look that someone is a pedophile – or a killer or a rapist. And being attracted to manly men otherwise is not mutually exclusive with pedophilia.

      • n24rc

        So gay guys don’t trade nude pics online? Ha ha ha. Are you even aware of what your saying?

        I get the outrage over pedophillia, but nothing you’ve suggested indicates criminal behaviors. Christ, the fact the boyfriend was on the university wifi network suggests they were unaware of the ages involved. This isn’t dark web behaviors of sharing child porn. For all we know they could have been cruising Grindr, who don’t do age verification at all.

        • FrenchBug

          Other people’s nude pics? How many “accidental” 17yo nudies of other people are they trading on Grindr to draw the attention of the mother-f***ing FBI?
          And *I* am not suggesting anything. I am simply saying, as Zach states better than me in his above comment, that the likelihood of a “mistake” is close to nil here. Innocent until proven guilty but too much smoke for me to entertain those cockamamie theories.
          I want this to be a mistake too btw. But chances are it is not.

          • n24rc

            I never suggested accidental, I said that a lot porn stars get solicited from underage gays online. It doesn’t mean in this case it applies, but it’s not unheard of. Also, files are stored on your drive even after your delete them – so these could be any number of things problematic. You don’t know the details yet.

          • FrenchBug

            I know they found 600 files of child pornography. That’s a lot of unsolicited stuff from underage fans THAT HE KEPT.

          • Ninja0980

            Yup.
            And even if they are 16-17, it’s still a crime and anyone with a brain knows that.

          • n24rc

            Agreed. Which is why those guys should block and delete that stuff as soon as it’s sent and not encourage it.

          • n24rc

            Suspected – key word here. What that content is we don’t know, 600 of what? Individuals or same person?

            I imagine the unit in charge is really terrible if it’s that amount of individual children involved. 600?

          • Edward

            Preach

          • Ninja0980

            I want it to be a mistake as well but I strongly suspect it’s not.

        • GN

          The man had over 600 ARCHIVED FUCKING IMAGES, which they were TRADING like baseball cards which indicates they clearly appreciated the fact that these were not legal-aged individuals. He was not caught with a couple of booty shot from a possible pre-teen deceitfully enticing people on Snapchat. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3e409f1af9e3c44cb2af4216f34ea37336340ebec3ec869b4c33fecd6f4ed470.gif

    • Jace

      Why? Because they’re good looking?

    • johnn

      just to be clear i’m not defending anyone, but i ran into these young guys setting me up too on line. i had a guy show up that when i got a really good look at him in person i wouldnt let him in he was 15..his pics were definately looking older and he admitted he set them up that way. i literally would not let him in. scared the fuck out of me. you never know who you are talking to

    • edginghours

      Reportedly on both of their devices, so the “gay teens who solicit Blu with stuff” doesn’t fly. Further the boyfriend was the one targeted, they found Blu after the fact. You don’t know these men, you have no insight into their lives, so stop projecting your fantasy onto them.

  • Ninja0980

    Saw the story and was hoping it wasn’t him.
    Sadly it is so I have just deleted all the movies I had with him.
    I’m not going to get off on someone who kiddy porn, just not going to.

  • Luca

    I was wondering, what’s the lawful criterion for “child pornography”?

    • n24rc

      Any nudity under the age of 18 – regardless of who the recipients are are illegally in possession of child porn. In some districts 17 years can be charged in possession of it because of the phenomenon of sexting that is going on. So it’s very pervasive and ubiquitous as much as your smartphone.

      • Luca

        That’s terrible. Mixing up in the same basket prepuberal children and 15-17 y.o. is ridiculous.

      • Luca

        Said that, if the police made a targeted warrant search, I suppose the guy wasn’t just downloading photos or videos from whatever site, but specifically from sites known to the police for that… so i guess it was not the occasional underage fling or some general twink fetish.

        • n24rc

          That’s a different ballgame. If it’s dark web stuff, with sites servicing that content then it’s a definite problem.

          • Luca

            Definitely!

      • OneOfTheManyChris

        Technically this is not correct. If it were, then all pediatric medical texts would be considered child porn. There is also an issue with soft core child porn. In the early days of the web there was an explosion of non-nude images of the sort you’d find in Victoria’s Secret catalogs, except with little kids. Sometimes very little kids. There’s been some legal changes to stop that, although I’m not an expert. The rules use words like “lewd and lascivious display.”

  • bloody mary

    Complete with creepy pornstache.

  • Marik Ishtar

    No no no no no no not him
    No no whyyyyy
    Not him no no no
    Why him? Why?
    Nooooooooooo
    Please no
    No no

    • moondoggy

      I knew he was an asshole. I saw him on manhunt once and I sent a friendly message just saying “I like your work.” He deleted it unread. No one is so popular that reading a friendly one-line email is a hardship. He didn’t even have to reply — I was just attempting to be kind.

      lol … Not to make this all about me.

      • peter

        You know, I now remember seeing him dis a customer at Splash who complimented him on his adult work. It’s like he didn’t get that the principal reason he had the job in the first place was because he was a porn star and would draw customers. It’s not like he was a looker.

        • FrenchBug

          Well, I found him attractive but I admit that objectively he is not classically good-looking and a lot of people probably had the hots for him based on the redhead thing.

          That said, and without defending anybody ever being rude, I can easily imagine that it might sometimes get annoying to be constantly brought back to his porn work in various other social situations. I get that he should have thought of that before engaging in that kind of career, but even the most laidback porn star might have moments where he doesn’t want to be “bothered”.

          • peter

            He was working at a high profile gay bar in Chelsea, in his skivvies. The whole point of having him there was to put on a show. So yeah, he was supposed to be sexually objectified.

      • FrenchBug

        I will say this: sometimes, on some of those websites, you can read the message without opening it when it is short – or you can read it in the alert email you receive if you get email notifications (I know adam4adam was like that). I don’t remember how Manhunt was but I do that sometimes on Facebook. I can read the one line message without opening the conversation and when I don’t want the other person to be sure I read it until I am ready to respond, I leave it like that. lol

  • Isiah

    That first I thought it was a gay 4 pay actor but when I saw boyfriend I was like oh shit This is messed up and gay pride is almost here these dumbasses gonna make black gospel singer Kim Burrell homophobic words true but straight people rape kids also but it is a possibility that the images possibility 14 or15 or 16 -year-old I hope they’re not little kids like 1 up to 13 I remember that there was a story about a gay man who was arrested for child porn and they found out that those twink in those images were actually grown man. they should tell how old the victims in the images are in this article the cops did that when they raid a pedophilia rings this month. this is like the Mike Dozier situation all over again they will use do this against gay people and saying that pedophilia is connected to gay men. Zack I hope you post more updates of this article their bell is a lot of money but not as big as Mike Dozier. One bad thing happened after the other first the Seattle Mayor Murray it’s not gonna take reelection because of those allegations then the gay porn Power couple Adam Champ and his husband Carlo Masi broke up just got married last month https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dacf7e2bdf3838ae00f84a120da0af9ef1490d1c96aa2f9a89d261ac4ae1c276.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a636b47cf58ffc4e4636445c9a7804014a8d6e5e0403261579eab5b893bceeb4.png and now this this is a bad week for the LGBT community. This makes don’t want to jerk off nomore

    • n24rc

      Alright Russian troll. 😀

      • Isiah

        I’m not a troll

        • n24rc

          So which data farm do you work out of for Putin? Lol

          • Isiah

            No I’m not Russian I’m a black man

          • Pinko of the Grange

            Those aren’t mutually exclusive.

  • Isiah

    I hope more information comes out I will keep an eye on this story

  • sanfv

    You apologists are gross and just like pedophiles, y’all should be put on a boat and have it sunk.

    Signed,

    A parent

  • Isiah

    I hope it not toddlers, babies and kids on their computers that will be sick and they should get killed but if they are 14, 15 and 16 years ago on their computers then I won’t worry about it so much

    • First of all, if they were teenagers that shouldn’t ease your mind. It’s still illegal and it’s still sick.

      Second of all, you don’t deserve to “get killed” simply for having pornography on your computer. These people need to be held accountable for their actions, serve time in prison, register as a sexual predator, and then seek help. They don’t deserve to die. A lot of these people are not monsters, they’re just sick.

      • Isiah

        Pedos do need to be killed there was a 15 year old boy who rape a 4 year old baby he should get killed just like the other pedos in the world

        • What in the world does rape/sexual molestation have to do with this conversation?

  • Marik Ishtar

    You can’t really know someone.
    I thought he was one of the nice ones. I remember everyone saying how shy and quiet he was. It saddens me that people can be so sick underneath it all. You really hope for the best in people. And when people show you what an ass hole they can be we thank them for telling us in advance, sparing us the time we would have wasted on them. But then something like this happens- reminding all of us that the ones to look out for are wearing sheep’s clothing.
    And his boyfriend worked at a school, too. It’s so hard out there because many schools won’t hire gay men because they fear this very thing.
    This whole thing is a bit too depressing. I’ll think I’ll lie down for a bit, regroup my thoughts.

    I hope everyone has a pleasant day. Hug somebody for me!

    • peter

      His boyfriend didn’t work at a school. He was a psych resident at a teaching hospital affiliated with a major University. He probably did see patients, hopefully not children.

  • Zealot

    I’m wondering here, if just possibly (and as a child welfare worker/investigator, etc. I would NEVER suggest this is acceptable in any way shape or form) his psychologist BF/roommate may be a specialist in this field and this was in some way research. To treat paraphilia it helps to have an understanding about how it works, flows between users and the content of what they’re looking at. I was extremely paranoid when doing a paper on paraphilia in my master’s program, as I at one time had planned to specialize in treating paraphilia and related conditions. So even doing research gave me pause about handling these materials for this very reason. If this is not the case, then there are no more two people who should know better than not to engage with this stuff. It’s beyond ridiculous and disappointing.

    • sxg

      No bitch, share!!!

      • Zealot

        OH, dammit. I can’t get by with anything anymore anytime anywhere for any reason! LOL. Here’s why I deleted my ridiculous rambling on this subject.
        1. Everyone here has long ago heard my work history and yadda, yadda, yadda. It’s like that scene in “The Competition” where Ty Henderson moans about half way through Elaine Welton Hill’s performance…”that’s enough Mitzi, we’ve all seen the dress”.
        2. I had imagined some excuse for what may have happened which was at first (in my own mind) brilliant and well reasoned. Uh, NO. Turns out it was just after effects of the pain meds I’m on (post-surgery). So, no one needs to hear my drug-addled meanderings. Not today, anyway.
        3. Until there is more to know, I’m staying shut on this one (refer to excuse #1, previously provided). So for me the jury’s out; and since I had at one time really liked (read: fapped often to) Blu, I don’t know that my thinking he’s hot (then or now) has any meaning or relevance. P.S….It doesn’t!
        4. Anything wise or witty I might have contributed on this subject has long ago been said by those with minds much cleverer than mine.
        But sxg (auto correct just hates your screen handle BTW), I do love that you cared enough to ask for my opinion AND called me “bitch” in the same brief sentence. I love you so!

  • Isiah

    This makes my stomach hurts this is going to keep me up at night until We know the ages of these victims on those images Zachary keep us posted on this horrible story

  • johnn

    i’m so glad i like older guys especially guys around my age. it must be such a curse to be old and only crave young guys. personally i find many younger guys obsessive, overly romantic, petty and clingly

    • Hereweare

      I agree. When I was younger, I liked older. Now that I’m getting older, I like around my age, and maybe 5 years in either direction. I’ve never had a youth obsession. In addition to the traits you pointed out, for me, young guys simply talk too much.

  • There is more to this story then innocently collecting seventeen-year-old boys on your hard drive the shades of Mike Dozer

  • Xzamilloh

    All I can say is, keep being stupid, pedos, because you make it easier for yourself to be caught. I won’t make any rash judgments until more info comes out about Blu Kennedy

  • Isiah

    The cops busted a 57 year old name Steven Chase who ran the biggest child porn website in the world he was arrested in early 2015 after they arrested he the cops use his website to track down others pedos around the world who was going to his website there 150 to 250 members of the website they use it for two weeks before they shut it down this has led to the prosecution of 25 U.S. Prosecutors of kidd porn, the prosecution of 51 us-based hands on abusers, 55 us children were saved and identified, 296 sexually abused were saved and identified internationally, 350 us arrested and 548 international arrests I hope they are not connection to the sick pedos rings

    • Marcus Collack

      I didn’t know this. An operation of that size was shut down and so many children rescued, where was the news on this?

      • Pinko of the Grange

        the warrants were executed in Feb of 2015 Chase was sentenced last week.

  • Todd

    Is it me or is that a hard looking 33 ??
    Were there additional charges filed for that mustache ??

    • Ninja0980

      Was thinking the same exact thing.

      • FrenchBug

        To be fair, you rarely look your best in a mugshot after an unexpected arrest on child porn charges. Innocent or even guilty, I cannot imagine how one would feel in that situation.

  • Drunky McDrunkerson

    they both look so much better with sunglasses!

  • Alann6

    Oh no, Blu! Always liked you… what in the hell were you thinking of?? Hope it’s not true.

  • Scrapple

    If this is all true, that’s unfortunate. How the fuck are you a Yale educated psychiatrist and you’re doing this shit? You work on a college campus. What the fuck is wrong with you? And since Blu got into the business at a young age, I would think he would be more sensitive to the issue of sexualizing someone who isn’t of age. I will never understand that mentality, or the mentality of people who make excuses for those who get caught out there like that.

    • Truth. Some of the “justifications” people are trying in the comments are seriously disturbing.

      • Scrapple

        It’s beyond. If you’re not going to play “hypotheticals and suppositions” for Sebastian Young, I’m not sure why you would do it for Blu Kennedy. Identifying as gay doesn’t mean you get a pass for being a fuckup.

    • peter

      The presumption to which White Coats presume never ceases to astonish! The laws of common decency simply don’t apply to them. It’s as if the MD gives them a perpetual get of of jail free card!

      Also, have you ever met a shrink who wasn’t a creep?

      In Benjamin Martin’s case, I wonder if there wasn’t a history of sexual abuse.

  • NomadicNinja

    I don’t know how in the world anyone could get tricked into possessing AND distributing a sizeable collection of child pornography by throngs of adoring fans or what have you, but maybe I’m just a boring person.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4054478889be38cc63ef458670e10d7061820c2ce9ea142d7cc2269fee6f63ae.gif

    • Pinko of the Grange

      At this time only the “good Dr.” is being charged with distribution, not the artist formerly known as Blu

      • FrenchBug

        Yes – and it is an important distinction as we speculate since it is compatible with bad files being on devices owned by Blu without necessarily being his (in the most optimistic version of things) but NomadicNinja’s point was aimed at debunking the much less plausible theory mentioned in this thread that those files were somehow pics sent to Blu by adoring underage fans – which does not explain why they were being distributed by either of them, why they would have been kept in the first place, why they would have such a large number of them, and so on.

        • Pinko of the Grange

          Just cleaning up facts in that post, and not offering opinion.

  • Tim

    There is a huge dragnet effect here, no doubt. The big thing here is the boyfriend stuff, because if one of them was trading them, well ouch.

    My only experience with the collection capabilities of even basic and small-scale authorities comes from my time on the student court at my small college as a justice. A female student’s non-student boyfriend started downloading illegal movie and music files at their home off campus on her laptop, she then took it to class and the computer, in the background, kept downloading the files he’d requested, and she ended up being barred from the network for a semester and paying a fine and writing an essay.

    The thing is, the campus knew this happened within 15 minutes of it happening, and the music industry knew almost as fast. they had a complaint to the college by the close of business and she was sitting before us appealing her verdict handed down by student affairs two weeks later. it was revealing. it is so easy to catch these people if someone just tries. so these people are idiots.

  • FrenchBug

    Some minor updates as I wake up:
    1) Martin’s Facebook page is gone or has gone completely private. Unsurprising but does that mean he is out already?
    2) For what it is worth – and I owe it to notice it since I have been rather cynical since yesterday – the local news sure make it seem as if the boyfriend was the active viewer/user/trader of child porn. Maybe it is because of the UCSF doctor angle that they focus on him, sure, but while the bf was trading and viewing, Martin was arrested because child porn was also found on some of his devices . There could be a scenario in which those were, say, a shared computer and he didn’t know. I’ll keep my hopes (because I am rooting for him AND because the fewer pedophile scum we have out there, the better I feel) hanging on to that.

    • Isiah

      I’m rooting for both of them I hope Martin and his boyfriend are not guilty for this crime when u said that Martin’s fb account got deleted I think his boyfriend did it because his boyfriend is out of jail

      • FrenchBug

        How do you know the boyfriend is out of jail? Why would the boyfriend be out (he has more charges) and Blu not?

        • Pinko of the Grange

          $$$$

          • FrenchBug

            Would the boyfriend really have bailed HIMSELF out and let BK in prison?

          • FrenchBug

            It does seem there are conflicting versions of whose charges are worse. Urgh.

          • Pinko of the Grange

            Sociopath is what sociopath does.
            Maybe they weren’t romantic any longer would be the polite reason.

          • FrenchBug

            It does seem that there are conflicting versions as to whose charges are worse. Urgh.

          • Isiah

            Sometimes couple who do crime let the other slay in jail while the other go home and help the one who in jail I hope they don’t going against each other I hope his boyfriend help him out and get both of their names clear from these crimes

          • Ninja0980

            Yes.
            When it comes to stuff like this, every rat for themselves.

          • FrenchBug

            Maybe but he did delete Blu’s real-name Facebook page so they don’t sound in bad terms.

        • Isiah

          I know because i read it from a other gay porn news site

  • n24rc

    People need to remove the emotions about the topic in general. If these guys are guilty or innocent time will tell, but to go off published reports without much detail other than the photo count(which is speculative), I’d be cautious. BTW, the number of devices weren’t listed. So is it 100 pics per device which could be six across the both of them?

    If you really read the article it’s vague on it’s details.

    • FrenchBug

      Most of what you say here is fair enough. What we know is incompatible with a lot of the theories that are being thrown around in this thread BUT we do not know much. We might learn more one way or another later.

    • Pinko of the Grange

      Isn’t this one is enough category? If that one is obviously in violation.

      I think the real question is: where the devises shared?

      • FrenchBug

        100% the real question and the only plausible explanation that would exonerate Blu somewhat. Anything else is bunk.

        Also: the local news report (I am in San Francisco) explicitly says there were videos among the 600 files.

  • Isiah

    The arrests of Billy Lockhart and Benjamin Martin stemmed from the SFPD investigating Billy Lockhart (Martin’s boyfriend) at UCSF for a suspicion of using UCSF wi-fi to possession of child porn images. The investigation lead to a search warrant being issued by a judge for Lockhart resident.

    The search of Lockhart’s residence exposed Blu Kennedy’s massive amounts of child porn files. Lockhart was additionally booked on suspicion of distribution of child pornography (lesser of the charges now filed against Benjamin Martin). Benjamin Martin was in the residence at the time of the search and was booked for violating a state law of child pornography.
    Blu Kennedy aka Benjamin Martin charges are: (prior to legal counsel)

    Statues 311.11 (a) PC/F- 311.11(c)(1)PC/SA

    Possession or Control of Child Pornography

    Allegation of Matter Containing More than 600 Images

    Bond- $115,000 and remains in custody.

    California Law-

    California Penal Code Section 311.1, 311.2 (Knowingly sending, transporting, producing, possessing or duplicating child pornography with intent to distribute)

    Possession: Felony, a conviction requires the defendant to register with the state of California through the Sex Offender Registration Act. The punishment may be a fine up to $2,500, imprisonment in county jail for up to one year, or both. More severe sentences often become applicable if the defendant is a repeat offender. A defendant previously convicted as a sex offender may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment in state prison lasting two, four, or six years if charged again with possession of child pornography.
    The potential penalties and sentences depend on whether the defendant produced, possessed, distributed, or sold child pornography.

    Federal Law-

    Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, importation, reception, or possession of any image of child pornography. A violation of federal child pornography laws is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face fines severe statutory penalties.
    charges-Martin remains in custody- Lockhart has bonded out- as of May 12, 2017.

  • Isiah

    CITIZEN’S GUIDE TO U.S. FEDERAL LAW ON CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

    18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children
    (Production of child pornography)
    18 U.S.C. § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children
    18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
    (Possession, distribution and receipt of child pornography)
    18 U.S.C. § 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography
    18 U.S.C. § 2256- Definitions
    18 U.S.C. § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States

    Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

    Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

    Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child pornography using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child pornography offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law.

    Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child pornography offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child pornography across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child pornography violation. Even if the child pornography image itself did not traveled across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD Rom used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.

    In addition, Section 2251A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically prohibits any parent, legal guardian or other person in custody or control of a minor under the age of 18, to buy, sell, or transfer custody of that minor for purposes of producing child pornography.

    Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child pornography with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States.

    Any violation of federal child pornography law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child pornography in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child pornography offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment.

    It is important to note that an offender can be prosecuted under state child pornography laws in addition to, or instead of, federal law

  • occupyfannypack

    The psychiatrist guy was educated at NYU for undergrad; he was just at that overrated ivy league institution for his other part of the career. People need to stop fucking put this elitist oligarchical institutions on a fcukin’ pedestal. Anyway, there you go, another ivy league jewel~ <3

  • Kanaka

    Yike. I was hoping to see him again but not like this. Terrible.

  • 76disqus

    Fuck what a shame as I really liked him (Blu Kennedy that is). An awesome looking red head of which there are too few in gay porn.

  • IdeasforSale

    As a former victim of a child molester, I hate seeing this headline. I do not really want to know any more details but I wonder if they are classifying ‘twink porn’ as ‘child porn’. Some sites tow a very fine with how their models appear and some studios must play pretty loose with the age of majority (similar to how Brent Corrigan started). Then again, I may just be unwilling to imagine there are more than 600 videos of child porn being passed around.

  • peter

    Zach, Blu Kennedy goes back further than 2006. I think his earliest stuff was for CityBoys back in 2003, and then he worked for Corbin Fisher as AJ in 2004-5, when they were still shooting in Kansas City (Martin is from a KC suburb).

    He worked as a bartender at Splash in Chelsea in the mid-oughties, and eventually was canned for missing shifts or showing up for work high. Rumored to be heavily into the PNP scene. One of the senior bartenders there told me he was a real prima-donna and hard to work with.

    About that time his ManHunt profile said ‘not looking for love. Only interested in big muscles and big dicks’ (status left blank).

    He also claimed to be a practicing Episcopalian at this time, too. That came from his profile on the short-lived, g-rated gay dating site Connexion.

    • FrenchBug

      He also bartended at Eastern Block once upon a time but he has been working as a tech engineer of some sorts since he moved back to SF.
      Worth pointing out that where they are living is a really nice area of town so they were clearly making an OK living. What a waste of potential and for what?

      • peter

        Buena Vista Terrace, right across the street from naughty Buena Vista park. I used to live in Ashbury Heights, so I know the area well.

        Residents’ pay isn’t great, but it’s possible the hospital owned the unit and kept the rent down. I’m pretty sure they owned a bunch of buildings on Parnassus. Otherwise their residents would have to go all the way out to some place like San Leandro or Benicia to find something they could afford.

        • FrenchBug

          The block is in is on the Corona Heights side and it is very residential and lovely – to be blunt, if I were rich and could afford property in SF, that’d be my area of choice – quite gay, peaceful and Corona Heights park is my favorite park in the city.

    • Helen Damnation 🍑™

      He also did a few films for Amateur Straight Guys, if I recall correctly. He did one excellent 3-way with Rodney and Travis for ASG. He also did a hot scene with Spence.

    • emercycrite

      Wow he was AJ on CF? Totally don’t recognise him there.

  • peter

    They lived on Buena Vista Terrace. Fun times just across the street!

  • Maximus

    The only shocking part of this story is that the Yale-educated boyfriend doctor was stupid enough to commit his crimes using the wifi network of a major American public institution.

    As for you commenters who are suggesting that these scumbags could have just inadvertently received pictures of 16-17 year olds on Tumblr and/or Grindr: You all are clueless. You honestly think that SF law enforcement is going to allocate time and money to investigate and prosecute a few incidents that technically qualify as criminal acts because they just barely cross an artificial—age of consent is based upon cultural norms, not neurological or sexual development—redline? Nuh-huh. These degenerates are most assuredly being prosecuted for victimizing pre- and/or early-pubescent children.

    • Ninja0980

      I have a friend who is a retired cop and he sadly said that in cases like this, when someone does something this stupid to get caught, it’s not because they are stupid (they are in some cases.)
      It’s because after getting away with what they’ve done for so long, they start to think they’ll never get caught and thus begin to get sloppy, as this POS clearly did by using the public wifi of a major university.
      I fear this is only the tip of the iceberg with these two.

      • FrenchBug

        Maybe there is also a part of them that subconsciously wants to get caught?

        • Ninja0980

          From what I’ve read and seen, that isn’t the case most of the time.

          • FrenchBug

            I know; I am trying to hang on to my delusions about the truth of human nature.
            But rational me think my other theory about him thinking public WiFi makes it harder for him to be traced back is closer to the truth. Sometimes smart people stumble upon stupid ideas when they try to be clever

    • Sam Andros

      You really don’t know that this is true. You’re speculating. And I do believe that cops would do what you say if they wanted to target these guys. We’ve so many cases of cops entrapping men and charging them with prostitution. I don’t really know what happened and neither do you!

      • Maximus

        This is SFPD, not some local sheriff in Mississippi persecuting the county’s only openly gay couple. You’re telling me that an entire division of the SFPD is collaborating with the local prosecutor’s office to arrest and convict some doctor and his boyfriend who aren’t actually guilty of anything? Also, how does law enforcement “entrap” a suspect in a child porn possession and distribution case? The cops found hundreds of photos and videos of child porn on the suspects’ devices, for god’s sake!

        You are either a conspiracy nut or a sex offender yourself. How’s that for speculation?

  • peter
    • FrenchBug

      He did grow very beefy over his career, intentionally so. It was too much for my taste by the end but he looked great during the transition.
      Was always curious why his ginger got so much lighter over time. Is that something that happens or was it a color?

      • OneOfTheManyChris

        It actually looks dyed in Peter’s CF picture. It could just be lighting, but I wouldn’t be shocked if they actually asked him to dye it.

  • peter
  • NickDC

    I would confidently wager that the investigation (or a crying confession) will reveal that meth played a role in this situation…

  • freater

    Oh wow, news aside, he aged surprisingly well! That stache really works on him. Loved his old scenes too.

  • Nordschleife

    I swear they look almost the same. It seems like some gay men date guys who resemble them. Clearly they had more in common than just looks but this absolutely horrific.

  • Jer

    I’m a family practice PCP and can I just say how fucking tired I am of people saying “but but but some 18 year olds can look young!” and “but but but some 14 year olds can look older!” When you do enough physicals you learn that no, they really don’t and it’s quite obvious and it is fucking creepy to try and justify any behavior to the contrary. If you think a 14 year old can pass for 18 it’s because you want them to, not because they could.

  • Joseph

    why would a guy. to this day be able to get most gay men to sleep with him, be interested in children? It really makes me wonder what working in porn does to a person. When I first saw him on film he was a skinny red haired kid who I thought was as sweet as could be. Then he turns out to be a monster – ughhhhh. I know for a fact he did steroids for a while but that is not an excuse, it may make you behave irrationally – but children, come on? Maybe he was sexually assaulted as a child, and after seeing him in a vid all beefed up I thought he was really going to be a star, I would be curious as to why he was dropped from his video company or maybe he was never an “exclusive” but boy what a shame.

    • FrenchBug

      Let’s untangle some stuff here:
      1) Being able to get laid easily is unrelated to whether he is attracted to children. That’s tragic and monstrous especially if he acts on it but I am sure you understand the distinction. Obviously pedophiles should never ever do anything about those attractions they feel in any way, shape or form but I don’t know what someone who suffers from these kinds of sick attractions can do to overcome them. I can’t imagine they can easily talk about it with people to exercise those demons so I don’t know what the answer is. Our first thoughts should of course be for their victims if they act on it – even just by viewing material – but it is an illness.

      2) Working in porn has nothing to do with this in any case. Nothing. I am sure working in porn can have some other psychological effects on people, although I am pretty sure that for most performers whatever impact it has on them, on their ego and so on predated their porn career. There is nothing wrong with being a sex worker in itself but it clearly takes a different relationship with sex and intimacy and one’s sense of self that most people have. But working in porn does not make you more likely to be a pedophile or vice-versa so let’s not go there.

      3) I agree with another commenter that their widely rumored drug use might have a role in disinhibiting some of that behavior. Didn’t create the underlying attraction but that might have been the trigger for daring to *go there* and take those risks. On the other hand, there are no drug charges so our speculation might be moot – wouldn’t have the warrant turned up some stuff if they were regular users?

      4) He was one of those steady second-level performers whose name is recognizable but never becomes a headliner. And my small knowledge of him through common friends and close following of the porn world tells me that he simply retired because he wanted to… He was always doing other things at the same time but he simply arrived at the age where he wanted a “normal life” – not a bar job, say – and a 9-5 job and so on. I think he was going to school full time after he retired and wanted to focus on that: a very level-headed drama-free decision that makes the current mess even more stunning for me.

  • Isiah

    This is probably mistake because if you google twink gay porn this “Suspected child abuse content has been removed from this page. Report child abuse content.” Show up

  • porn122122

    sexualizing

  • porn122122

    vfergergr.1x.Net

  • porn122122

    sex.1x.Net

  • porn122122

    Sex.1x.Net

  • porn122122

    p0rn.1x.Net

  • porn122122

    >>>>>>> p0rn.1x.Net

  • porn122122

    hard porn

    >>>>>>> p0rn.1x.Net

  • porn

    hard porn Tanned exotic milf Jewels Jade takes her stepson’s fat cock in her tattooed pussy

    >>>>>>> p0rn.1x.Net

  • Cesar

    Never trust a “gay guy” who fucks women on camera for money. We all remeber his Cf scenes

  • Orlando Chan

    Two sickos!!!!!

  • Kevin Jones

    Ugh! How disgusting!

    And it also shows just how well people can hide their dark sides from others.

  • peter
  • rhinoHI

    I actually wonder if the enormous cultural and legal taboo on child porn is making more people seek it out just to see what all the fuss is about. It’s obvious that when something is prohibited it increases the thrill. Transgression of taboos can be highly erotic, especially for the sexually jaded who must seek out more extreme sexual practices to get off.

  • FrenchBug

    Per the new news link on the wall, “In addition to the images and videos, Maldonado said Lockhart’s electronic files also included stories about children being raped, information on how to do it and conversations with others about exploiting children.”

    Jesus Fucking Christ. Can the “It must just be pictures of 17yo fans on Grindr” crowd just let it go now?

  • Sam Andros

    Very disturbing and surprising. I never think of porn actors as pedophiles. They’re all hot men having hot sex with other hot men. You wouldn’t think they’d be into kids.

  • Uncle Afterthought

    Doesn’t matter your sex or sexuality, if you exploit or mess with children in any way you need to disappear from society forever!

  • Cire Repard

    Up Date:….All Charges of child porn where dropped on Martion,

    • FrenchBug

      Thanks for letting us know. I guess the boyfriend was storing his stuff on shared computers.

      • Cire Repard

        I guess so because the police cleared him.

        • Zachary Sire

          Where are you getting this information? It’s not available in court records as of right now, so I take it you must know him personally?

          • FrenchBug

            If you don’t mind me asking, where do you look that up? Pacer?

          • Zachary Sire

            It isn’t (wasn’t?) a federal case, so no Pacer. It’s local SF courts.

          • FrenchBug

            Thanks for that answer. So I see both he and the boyfriend have a hearing on Friday.

          • Zachary Sire

            That’s what it says…but if the charges were dropped, that hearing date just hasn’t been canceled for Martin in the system.

          • FrenchBug

            I don’t know enough about the judicial system to know what it means if anything but there is a new hearing (rescheduled?) for BOTH of them on the 20th.
            Since it wasn’t there when we last discussed this, it clearly means it wasn’t an “oversight” that BM was included and BK/BM still has a case pending. Don’t know if a hearing would be required to formally drop the charges but as of when this commenter posted, the case against him was still active, it would seem.