Andy Taylor And Angel Rivera Take Turns Fucking Each Other Bareback In Helix’s First Flip-Fuck Scene In FOUR Months!

Posted November 20, 2018 by with 24 comments

Angel-Rivera-and-Andy-Taylor-006Finally! Helix hasn’t released a flip-fuck scene in almost four months (the last time they did, it was with Aiden Garcia and Gabriel Martin all the way back on August 1st), but the versatility drought ends today with the pairing of gay porn stars Andy Taylor and Angel Rivera.

Angel-Rivera-and-Andy-Taylor-013Helix’s resident tops (Corey, Josh, Corbin, Blake, Luke, Johnny) are sitting this one out so Andy and Angel can show off their versatility, and it’s a nice change of pace. They do a great job fucking each other in a few positions (the topping from both stars is strong), and the best part is at the end, when Andy shoots a giant load of cum into Angel’s mouth while he’s riding Angel’s cock. Also, this is filmed perfectly without any lighting issues (some commenters have complained about recent scenes being too dark or too bright).

Angel-Rivera-and-Andy-Taylor-019 Angel-Rivera-and-Andy-Taylor-024Trailer (watch full scene here):

[Helix: Andy Taylor And Angel Rivera Flip-Fuck Bareback]

 

  • Luke

    Best Helix scene for a LONG time! I’d forgotten how much I loved Angel Rivera as a bottom. He’s a great top, but there’s something special about his bottom performances. Hope Helix can put out more scenes like this one from now on

  • B.C.

    Oh, yes! They look amazing together. And what a difference Andy’s new hairstyle makes.

  • Drew Kingston

    Fucking in the dark serie?
    But yes, I like Andy’s new hairstyle !

  • Jbj

    This is the best that I’ve ever seen Andy look….and angel, I declare, has the sexiest chest in the industry. 😍🔥

  • adamb

    I’m in love/adore Mr Andy Taylor & this looks like perfection, that is all!

  • Shawn

    This was a really good scene, I’ve been critical of Helix lately but hopefully this is a return to form.

    Love that Andy ditched the floppy hair too. He’s so pretty it makes me want to cry.

  • Willie Starr

    Andy Taylor’s ass gets SO MUCH BETTER the less he looks like a child.

  • FrenchBug

    XbiZ just published an article called “Helix Studios: Gay Guys for Female Eyes” that was clearly written in collaboration with the marketing people at Helix.
    So, yeah, not only was I right and they are going down that path, but they actually have the nerve to lie about it to us.

    • Drew Kingston

      Is it why in several scenes the bottom acted like a girl: no hard-on and even no cum? Only the toy of the top. I hope I’m wrong.

    • No_No_No_Yes

      Always go with your gut, it never fails you. It’s pretty ratchet the dude made a special point to come and personally “dispel” your observations – some real shit in fact. On the upside – Andy without the “swirly do” A TOTAL +10. Go watch the trailer for the most recent GH update, you’ll get an eye full of the tremendous direction and camera work about to hit this place too. The term “Pottery Barn Commercial” spring to mind. Anyway, +10 to you. You totally called it.

    • stagboys

      No, you were wrong. That article was exploring why female fans are being drawn to gay porn. If you had read it you would see:

      “Miller says they never set out to appeal specifically to women. “We’ve never really targeted anybody like that,” he tells XBIZ. “The productions that we do, the type of movie I want to see, and the models that we have, if anything I would think we are expanding our audience base by having individuals that more people are attracted to.“

      • FrenchBug

        Listen, I know how these articles get made. That angle didn’t come out of nowhere. That KM denies making porn for women does not negate the fact that the whole article is dedicated to the fact Helix attracts a lot of loyal female fans. We know that if the marketing department of Helix didn’t think this was the angle they wanted to sell, this wouldn’t have been the thoroughline of this article.
        Don’t insult my intelligence now: you guys are clearly clearly pushing this. You can pretend you are not “making” the porn with that audience in mind, but the fact is you are explicitly marketing yourself that way.
        And the fact I had guessed as much just by watching your scenes tells me that your denials are either self-delusion or bunk.
        Again: I wasn’t born yesterday. The very fact that article was written was based on a pitch from Helix.

        • Seanumich

          SO WHAT. Last I checked this was a BUSINESS. A females money is as valid as a gay man’s. If you dont liek the porn, then that is on YOU. Find something else. Maybe this will shock you, but many gay men like porn that will also appeal to FEMALES. Again I ask SO WHAT. If this is such an issue to you,. DONT WATCH IT. You sound like a whiney cunt who thinks YOU a “rando” are the most important person int he world YOU ARENT. You have choices. If you dont like what they do., MAKE YOUR OWN, or BUY SOMETHING ELSE.

          • FrenchBug

            As my screenname indicates, I am originally French: Whiney cuntiness is in my DNA and I am proud of it.
            If you don’t like it, you’re welcome to not read my comments.

    • Shawn

      Read the article, not just the headline. It talks about how they’ve sort of cultivated a following of female fans by their unique approach of encouraging the models to be super active on social media etc. It’s nothing to do with pushing content aimed specifically at female viewers don’t worry.

      • FrenchBug

        I read the article just fine. And the article explains how they are marketing themselves to women – which I had guessed just by watching their content.
        That alone says it all: if I guessed that marketing strategy without being told, then clearly it has seeped into the choices they make when filming.
        Btw, it is not a stupid marketing strategy; it is one that makes for poor porn and alienates long-time fans like myself. But, hey, it is not a crazy choice they made.
        But I am irritated that they are even pretending it is not a thing. The article says it is a thing and XbiZ didn’t pull that out of their behinds. Either they were pitched that idea by the Helix marketing department, or they noticed it the same way I did – by watching.

        • Shawn

          I’m a long time fan too, I just guess I read it differently than you. What I took from it is that they have garnered a female following organically, not because they explicitly marketed toward them and nor that they plan to do so in the future.

          Maybe we have different tastes but I enjoy the intimacy that you get in a lot of the Helix scenes. I agree that sometimes the lighting choices are questionable, and the over-use of certain positions definitely gets a bit stale but overall I am happy with my subscription.

          • FrenchBug

            I am happy you are happy; I really am. The lighting issue is a deal-breaker for me but as mentioned before, I am rooting for them, not attacking them, so I am glad they are not alienating everybody. I still hold out hope that they will tire of it and move back to something I enjoy so I can join again.
            I understand their argument that the female audience grew organically; I don’t doubt that is true. But the mere existence of the article and some of the elements mentioned in the articles (the books, Taylor, etc.) are clearly made to build upon what they think it is a promising market for them. That’s their right. Make that coin!
            My criticism is that if I guessed that they were trying to push further into that female audience just by watching what they release, then clearly the marketing strategy has had some influence – conscious or not – on what they do.
            I am not that smart; I didn’t guess. I saw it on my screen.

          • Seanumich

            If it is a deal breaker for you, THEN GO AWAY ALREADY. For fucks sake it isnt life or death. I know for a FACT female money spends the same as YOURS. Go find a studio who has better lighting that matches your “sensibilities”/ The studio has explained their side, but are bbasically calling them liars. SO why are YOU so invested in caring about this? GET OVER IT. It reminds me of the days peopel complained about the Falcon car wash (men shaved and tanned). If you dont like that, dont watch it. I hate super hero movies, so guess what? I DONT WATCH THEM. I hate porn that has incest or rape, so guess what? I DONT WATCH THEM
            If you arent smart enough to NOT WATCH, then it is on you

          • FrenchBug

            As I have stated many times in this thread, I have indeed stopped watching and unsubscribed.
            But, on a porn blog that gives me the space to talk about it, I will continue sharing my opinion, especially since Helix folks actually read these comments. As someone who was a fan and customer for many many years, I will not shy from telling them what I think they are doing wrong and what they could do to lure me back.
            They can choose to ignore it, it is entirely their right. But I fail to see how saying I dislike their recent output is any less interesting/important/relevant than saying you do. None of our comments matter. None. We are just exchanging ideas and opinions and wasting time. I will return the question: why do you care?

            And of course if you don’t like my criticism, you don’t have to read it. Start by taking your own advice; what is good for the goose, etc.

        • No_No_No_Yes

          I find the choice to hire RG falls right in line with pretty much your entire list of shortcomings, I can pretty much tell exactly which of CF’s scenes this guy shot, they all have the same shaken baby camera work – and he has a thing for mirrors. He manages to stay out of “detailed closeup” choosing instead for ridiculous face closeups and far zone fuck shots.

          While CF never adds credits for the “crew”, his style is unmistakable, almost more a “voyeur” view than hardcore, and the twisting turning camera work is dizzying. He also like to snap from one view to the other, to the extent he manages to miss anything of significance for the most part. Go look up CF’s Kent fucks Josh on Google, you will see what I mean. His style is like a fingerprint.

          If they are looking to homogenize their fucking, keeping the “details” obscured, he is the perfect candidate. Like the dude is allergic to dick. It also follows that they are aiming at CF’s territory, I am pretty sure they also have a fairly strong female audience. I said it a long time ago, I feel like gay porn has been hijacked, it has never been more true than it is now.

          I’m unplugging my SC membership and taking my dollars to GISP next month. He may not churn out the scene count some do, but at least his stuff is quality, and I don’t feel like I am supporting someone’s lame assed agenda.

          • FrenchBug

            Please tell me he is not also responsible for that horrendous “After Dark” series. I mean, it is exactly the kind of lighting Helix uses nowadays
            for all their scenes so I guess that’d be an extra reason they thought he was a good match.

          • No_No_No_Yes

            I can’t say, I never watched any of the after dark stuff. But I will have a look, his style is pretty easily identified. All you really need to do is watch the infamous GH Kellan 3 way, and the two recent scenes with Max Richie. They are all pretty much cookie cutter in style. Given that CF doesn’t credit “directors” (for obvious reasons) all you need to do is watch the 3 GH scenes and you can easily ID the ones he shot at CF. It’s that obvious.

  • Sed

    FrenchBug is right. Helix used to be fun porn for gay men. They used to do 3 ways and 4ways, live shows and gang bangs. Now every theme is boyfriends or cheating or romance. Frankly as a man I just want to see some good old fashioned rauchy nasty fucking every now and then. Not gay porn for the Bridge club.