There Is Now A Gay Porn Studio Devoted To Family Members Fucking, And It’s Called “Family Dick”

Posted September 15, 2017 by with 163 comments

family5With a couple of exceptions, every single gay porn studio producing content today releases scenes (or, in some cases, full movies) featuring family members fucking. Now, there’s a gay porn studio devoted entirely to family members fucking, and it’s called “Family Dick” (of course).

Family Dick—which comes from the same content producers behind Mormon Boyz—does not feature actual family members, of course, and here’s the disclaimer that runs before every Family Dick video:

familydisclaimerLike most family-themed porn, Family Dick has the usual mix of step dads fucking step sons, step brothers fucking, and obviously a few uncles fucking step nephews, too. But, if you were to just randomly turn on one of the Family Dick videos, you might not be able to tell that they are fake/step family members, and it feels more authentic than any of the other family-themed gay porn I’ve seen.

This one below, titled “Big Boy Underwear,” is possibly one of the most insane and uncomfortable videos I’ve seen in years? There’s (obviously) a dad and a son, and after talking about needing to get him some new “big boy underwear,” the step dad fucks the son, who repeatedly cries out “daddy!” and, “what if mom comes home?” Opening moments:

And the full trailer:

[Family Dick: Big Boy Underwear]

Here’s another trailer, if this is a theme you can’t enough of. This one features step brothers admiring their dad’s big cock, and then fucking each other on top of the dad, who is apparently sleeping/passed out??

[Family Dick: Passed Out Dad]

There are a few recognizable faces on Family Dick, including Charlie Pattinson (above), and also Dante Colle (below), who plays a step son who sucks his step dad’s cock through a glory hole at an adult book store.

[Family Dick]

Have a great weekend, everybody. I need to go shower in bleach for the next few days.

  • TK

    On tumblr there is a gif set floating around from this site. In it, the dad whores out the son to a friend and the son doesn’t want to do it. He begs the dad, “Please don’t make me do it.” It has over 40,000 likes…sadly, this site will do well. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/caf307a18c36f26fcf5707a379a327023747be501f3cca1a926dfb7ac7f48c41.gif

    • Jason

      So that makes it incest AND rape porn then? That scenario is really fucked up.

      • Phraughy

        Yes, it is both. It was horrible to see. The kid is raped twice. I saw it on Pornhub and thought I had come across a dark web video. I am still disturbed by it

  • gaysiantwink

    idec, I downloaded every scene with President Oaks.

    • Galaxy_Scribe

      I only saw 1 (another has him as a bystander) Are there more?

      • Jace

        Yes, there’s one where he fucks Elder Sorensen in the garage.

        • Galaxy_Scribe

          Yeah thats the 1 I saw. And the other where he watches. Is there any more?

          • Donald Horn

            I saw the movie night one with the little boy on a streaming site. He gets fucked in a onesie.

  • Gatxer The GREAT

    and yet you are using a refer link to make money off them?

    • Pinko of the Grange

      The link is part of the agreement to use the pix and clips. Do we know that Zack has singed up for compensation?

  • Scrapple

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3c2efd926698c0624be35fdf5593512304c8a1ea1b340f3e94519f310c5cbd72.gif
    1. Joe Gage and Ray Dragon already did this. And they did it much better. And less icky.

    2. Is this VHS found footage theme inspired by Paranormal activity, The Goldbergs or one of those true crime documentaries featured on Investigation Discovery?

    3. On top of the incest fetish they also want to present some of these models as being underage? Driving in both those lanes at the same times seems like a bad idea.

    4. Dante…you’re better than this.

    5. Charlie…you’re home.

    6. This site seems slightly less rapey than Mormon Boyz. I guess that’s something.

    7. “Your orgasm is not neutral.”
    -Wesley Woods

    8. I can’t.

    • Cubankid

      LMAO @ #5 & 7

    • Ceecee

      I couldn’t agree more with all of these, but mostly 5.
      I have no idea how Charlie was picked up as a Men exclusive but thank the good lord that is over.

      • Scrapple

        His porn name should’ve been Eliza Doolittle. He does little and he has a hard time speaking the Queen’s English.

        • Ceecee

          His porn name should have been reverse Midas because everything he touches turns to shit.

    • moondoggy

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/17f7ca63cf93335229e2167be37daab3cac1b39171f4d184e162d264676fe70a.gif

      Genesis 9:20-27.

      20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:

      21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.

      24 ¶ And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.

      • Scrapple

        Yep. I know if my mother was found to be drunk and naked I’d go grab my siblings so they could all see. Because that seems like an appropriate response. And Ham’s lineage was cursed because of what he did…

        • Javier Smith

          I was raised to believe that the curse of Ham was to have darker skin so all people of color were essentially ‘sons of Ham’ and it was okay to treat them as lower class because Jeebus said so or something.

          • James Johnson III

            I am sorry you were raised to believe the “Descendants of Ham Theory”. I hope you have stopped believing that. I’ve heard of it myself and it always sickened and saddened me to hear it

          • Javier Smith

            I never really believed it but didn’t fully understand how harmful it was until I got older.

          • James Johnson III

            Yeah. I’ve had racists try to use that theory on me to say that I only deserved jobs as a janitor or subordinate because the Bible says so. It’s sad and still prevalent

  • TheSagaOf

    Ehhhhhhhh, to each their own. I’ve got a backlog of stuff to fap to anyways.

  • Zealot

    I started to E-Mail Zach about this site a few weeks ago when I first saw some of their content online. I think most of the regulars here know about where I work and what I do for a living. And that is where this comment is going to come from– over 20 years of work with children who have had their lives destroyed and their futures co-opted by adults seeking out their own deviant and despicable sexual pleasures.

    I’m for freedom, but only insofar as the target or victim of that speech is able to stand up and speak for themselves in rebuttal. Children have no rights in our society, and are not even considered credible witnesses by courts when they suffer horrible abuse such as is depicted in these scenes. They can’t say, “Please don’t pay for and support this kind of thing because it’s fueling a monster that robs us of our innocence and ability to be well-rounded human beings when we grow up”.

    We so-called adults do things like this, and worse and quickly excuse ourselves by using the lamest of excuses (it’s just a fantasy, it’s my right under freedom of speech, what I do in the privacy of my own home is no one’s business but my own)…then wonder why our youth are so fucked up? I know why. It’s looking back at us in the mirror every day.

    • GN

      The industry too often skirts this unfortunate topic in a glib manner. I’ve heard of (and encountered) many derailed, drug-riddled lives who’s sad story began with “I was raped by my older brother/cousin/father/uncle”. For that reason, I am not willing to give this a pass as mere fappable fun for mature consenting adults who discern innocent fantasy vs. appetizers for sexual abuse. It’s as bad as the straight studios who deliberately employ pre-teen appearing girls to be abused in gangbangs, etc. It is not an element of kink or pervesion, it is a demonstration of the weak being exploited and in the minds of those apt to exploit, it serves to embolden their fantasies. If you walked in on what you’re seeing, and the younger person was the innocent age they are portraying him to be in the scene, how would you feel? Zealot, keep fighting for those children. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1c77e3f0e2385f2920d54b9f32262b971b56607f3785ab8af36283a8d50f645c.gif

      • Zealot

        GN – Thanks so much for the kind response. In 2017 I just can’t believe that this community would accept this as sexual entertainment.

        • Hari Kalyan

          Agreed. This isn’t porn. This is sick. Like Jared Fogle SICK! I don’t care if the actors are technically legal. And that little disclaimer is laughable. That site knows damn well what they’re really selling/promoting here. What sane adult can get off to this. UGH! That site needs to go out of business fast.

          • Zealot

            Exactly. Don’t for one minute believe that those behind this site aren’t completely aware of who they’re marketing to. It may present what looks to be a safe place for pedophiles to conglomerate and partake of the content without repercussion, but it’s no better than kiddie porn in my mind and it should be banned.

          • Sean

            So YOU get to determine what gets banned? FUCK YOU. None of those performers appear to be underage in any way. In fact, I would say most look pretty long in the tooth. Would you ban porn that depicts bondage? How about water sports? Maybe you want to ban porn that depicts cheating spouses? How about mainstream movies that show the same things? Maybe stop any movie that has something that is objectionable to you? Get over yourself. I dont give a shit what you doi for a living. You sound like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson

          • Zealot

            No, I absolutely know that I don’t get to decide what it out there in terms of content. I WOULD ban this site if I could for reasons I’ve stated here and in other posts about children being portrayed as objects to be exploited. But I’m not in that position. And for the record, in none of my comments here have I spoken to any other sexual acts between consenting adults who are portrayed as adults (not even in scenes portraying incest scenarios). Live and let live is my motto when it comes to porn because I understand that it’s different strokes for different folks….just don’t try and pass off the actors (no matter how old they actually are, or look) as children, and I’ll gladly keep my opinions to myself.

          • Phraughy

            It completely crosses the line. I work in porn and even this site is too much for me.It is wrong.

          • Zealot

            It’s good to know that some folks like you who are in the business see how unhealthy sites like this are. Thanks for the shout back. Happy Holidays!

          • Phraughy

            Happy Holidays to you too!

        • marc vu

          straight porn did it too… in most peoples’ view pornography is sickening anyway… I am not into step dad and son porn at all, but i did got turn on by a older guys… i found all the daddies in the videos are very hot…

        • Phraughy

          There are a lot of men out there that like sex with underage men. Sadly there is a market for it. I really think that if I hadn’t slept with older men when I was a teenager my life would be very different. It is not the positive experience these sites fantasize it to be. I do not condone this site. It is wrong on so many levels.

      • badgamer1967

        Well said and I am so sick of this kind of twisted content and to this “studio” thank you for continuing to advance the myth that gay men are nothing but molesters into incest and wanting to pray on the young and innocent https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ebd6dc658012d2f1e9aad5e0ff9c116fea672e8cc45221372be1bf365a1493e0.gif

        • Zealot

          What irks me the most is that mainstream America already looks at this community and believes that we exist to propagate our “agenda” by recruiting and sexually indoctrinating children. This community should rail against all such content as unacceptable. This site does damage and all such content does this community no favors.

    • CA

      100 percent agree. What is shocking to me is how the mainstream media supports similar behavior in very cavalier accepting ways.

      1) One of the most popular teen shows in the last five years, Pretty Little Liars, featured a teacher dating one of his 15/16 year old students like it was normal.

      2) Animal Kingdom has a 16 year old girl sleeping with a 30 something man and doing coke regularly.

      3) Shameless highlighted the teenage gay character working as an underaged prostitute and then began dating a 6o year old man.

      4) The Archie Comic re-boot, Riverdale, has Archie fucking Ms. Grundy. WTF

      Again, all casually discussed on screen and we are supposed to accept the relationship as normal. Not only normal, but then feel sympathy for the adult in the relationship in each of those storylines.

      It is so weird to me that the portrayal of teenagers dating adults on TV and in movies is shown as okay by the liberal Hollywood elite, but as soon as a teacher has an affair with a 16 year old boy he/she is tossed in jail. We send contradicting messages.

      I suppose when Meryl Streep and her friends all support then defend Roman Polanski and let him evade prison after drugging and raping a 13 year old…this is the society we live in.

      • Pinko of the Grange

        See one is fiction the other is real. And all are presented as consensual.
        What about first person shooter video games?

        • CA

          Let’s stick to movies and TV and not add a different topic.

          In TV/movies, people who kill are treated as criminals—unless the criminal is killed by the “good guy”. In the scenarios I mentioned regarding underage sex, the criminal is never pursued criminally for their illegal behaviors. I realize it is fiction, but it creates a feeling of social acceptance.

          There is also nothing fictional about Hollywood’s support of Roman Polanski.

          • Pinko of the Grange

            No let us not; both are entertainment and no link between viewing/playing and action has been shown. So the comparison is apt.

            Polanski pleaded guilty and was incarcerated for an appropriate period for the time. A Judge, that was seeking re-election with a history of questionable actions, decided to grand stand and divert the public’s attention by going against the DA’s recommendation and pre-sentencing report. And this is just the surface. I have never heard any one excuse his actions.

            For the record this porn site has crossed the line to it: may be legal but it is darn creepy.

          • CA

            Sentenced 42 days for drugging and raping a 13 year old.

            You say the judge was grandstanding, I would suggest his constituents were like…WHAT THE FUCK. Unacceptable–as they should have–so the Judge pulled his fucking act together and revoked the deal. Polanski skipped his probation and is a wanted criminal in the United States. He has been awarded dozens of accolades most notably an Academy Award.

            “I am Really Sorry That He is In Jail” –Meryl Streep on Polanski

            You can find plenty more from others.

            As far as your accepted waiver of sexual assault of minors being normalized in fictional media. I personally find it irresponsible and wrong. If you think it’s just for fun to have 60 year old men fucking boys in the media, noted. It is normalized so I realize I must be the odd man out on the subject.

          • Sean

            If yuou dont want to watch it they have this ne device called an ON OFF button. See how easy that is MORON

          • CA

            Oh, thanks. I learn something new every day.

            I’ll just turn the TV off and then sexual abuse won’t exist.

          • Maximus

            Methodological constraints make it impossible to establish a causal link between consuming violent media and behaving violently. However, there is good correlational evidence, and Bandura’s social learning experiments demonstrated that children can learn aggressive behavior from watching real life role models behave aggressively. We also know that repeated exposure to a stimulus reduces physiological reactivity to that stimulus (habituation). It’s not much of an inferential leap to deduce that exposure to violent media can normalize violence and make violence easier to imitate.

      • peter

        I want to see the new Louis CK movie where his 17 year-old daughter starts seeing a brilliant septuagenarian filmmaker who in now way is supposed to be Woody Allen

      • Scrapple

        It’s such a WTF moment when these relationships are not only brought out, but the other adults involved in the situation condone it. On PLL Ezra literally stalked Aria and knew how old she was, but began a relationship with her anyway. Didn’t lose his job. Didn’t really receive a backlash at all. On Animal Kingdom the police actually told Jay’s teacher to do whatever she could to get the info. They left so she could sleep with him. How fucked up is that? The parents on Riverdale ran Ms. Grundy out of town but they hardly called her out on how disgusting that relationship was. People on Teen Wolf were shipping Lydia and Parrish. Ignore the fact that she’s a teenager and he’s a sheriff’s deputy. And on and on and on. Remember Pacey sleeping with his teacher on Dawson’s Creek? This shit has been going on for decades.

        In the real world it seems attractiveness determines whether or not these “relationships” are heavily scrutinized and punished. If the adult is attractive, people are more willing to let it go. And if the adult is a pretty woman, she generally gets a slap on the wrist. Or in the case of Roman or Woody Allen, if you’re talented and there is money to be made off you, then do whatever the fuck you want. That’s our society’s value system.

        • CA

          Yes, you get what I’m saying….I don’t know about some of these other people. You and I are always on the same page.

          • Scrapple

            I hate to sound like I’m wagging my finger at people who find incest or intergenerational themes in porn sexy, because I’m really not. But once you add the underage factor it creates this weird lopsided power dynamic. If everyone is a consenting adult and being depicted that way, fine. But I think the last thing the gay community needs is to feed into stereotypes about the lecherous gay who waits on the chance to prey on the untainted, unsuspecting youth (even in his own family) so they can be “corrupted.” It’s so messy and uncreative.

            Also, it seems like you’re burning through Animal Kingdom pretty quickly.

          • CA

            Oh, right! That was your recommendation–I have three episodes left.

            Topic at hand:

            I’ve read more outrage over Colby Keller voting for Donald Trump than I have about adults sleeping with underaged kids on this blog. WTF? And to be fair, straight porn shoots the same themes, but as minorities we are the ones under the microscope.

          • Scrapple

            I think there were like three of us going crazy with the Animal Kingdom gifs. We couldn’t help it!

            With respect to Colby, I think again, attractiveness played a part. Colby was always an acquired taste. And his pseudo intellectual hobo chic image didn’t help matters. There are probably plenty of people who saw this as the perfect opportunity to get him tossed from the biz. But beyond that it’s harder to separate what Colby did from what a site like Family Dick is doing. If you don’t plan on sleeping with relatives or in-laws, and you’ve never been molested, it’s easier to detach yourself from what’s being presented by this site. It’s simply a fantasy. What Colby did (and continues to do) has real world implications. That reality which perpetuates fear, intolerance and hatred is harder to ignore.

          • CA

            Fair point about fantasy and reality–people attack Colby because his vote feels like an attack on them.

            I think what confuses me and why I don’t like the medias role in this, is that it may be one of the few federal crimes that happens on film regularly and the aggressor/felon isn’t prosecuted for it. We just let it go. I would say that because the industry has zero voice from children, they aren’t able to defend themselves like a women’s rights group would if a woman was beaten and raped by a main character regularly and he was only portrayed in a positive way. He–the villain–needs to go down in a ‘Big Little Lies’ kinda way.

            The HRC would flip their shit if the guys on Chicago Fire were tossing the F bomb around and attacking gay men for sport. No one seems to care that kids fuck adults on random shows though.

          • Scrapple

            I think there are quite a few child advocacy groups who speak out on this type of thing, but it never seems to go anywhere. Probably because at this stage of the game, nobody cares about closing the barn door because the horse is already in the next town over. Scandal had a storyline with an adult essentially prostituting a teenager (her payment was acceptance to Harvard) so she would have sex wither her boyfriend. The boyfriend was the President’s son, and the adult needed to steal a semen sample for a paternity test. The son was 15. And nobody thought any of that was disgusting. You couldn’t steal a brush or a used glass? That’s where we’re at. But it’s pretty telling that you will rarely see teenagers on mainstream tv shows smoking, but you’ll regularly see them drinking and carousing.

          • Sean

            None of these were UNDERAGED kids. hat dont you get about that? In the mainstream shit you mention they ARE underage. In this it is CLEAR they are not.

          • CA

            You should re-read what I wrote. I haven’t mentioned this new website at all in my comments. And don’t call me names.

          • peter

            When I was in high school, confused, and trying to figure things out, I was mercilessly cruised by a predatory Choir director. He kept on asking me out to dinner, or over to his apartment to smoke pot. I knew it was all wrong — I was 15 and he was 40! I kept on putting him off, and finally I brought it up to my Guidance Counselor. Apparently I wasn’t the first. It stopped, but he turned into such a fucking bitch after that. The incident left me with residual homophobia that it took years to overcome. It also made me an enemy of the Tenure and the Teacher’ Union, which is the only reason why this creep was allowed to keep his job.

          • CA

            What a terrible experience to have to go through and I find it to be a common story–especially from confused gay teens.

      • peter

        Polanski’s event took place in the seventies, when there was this culture of condign pedophilia among celebrities and (especially) rock-stars in LA. After his death, a former groupie published a piece reminiscing about losing her virginity to David Bowie when she was 14, and she went on to have a time-share arrangement with Bowie and Jimmy Page.

        Going back even further there was Errol Flynn hanging out at Hollywood High.

        • CA

          I’m sorry, but your comments are ridiculous. “culture of condoned pedophilia among celebrities”. What the fuck? It was illegal then as it is now.

          With your rationale, when did we decide it wasn’t okay? With Bill Cosby drugging and raping 5o women in the 70/80s? Maybe it was okay when Corey Haim and Corey Feldman were being passed around by movie execs in the 80’s? They seem to be doing just fine after that abuse. I guess Aaliyah was the first and last underaged girl R. Kelly took advantage of.

          The idea that a 14 year old can make these decisions in a wise way is the exact problem. 14 year old girls should not be in a timeshare with David Bowie. Of course they are tantalized by sex drugs and rock and role, but it is our job as society to protect them….even clearly when their parents are not able to.

          • peter

            ‘Condign’ x ‘condoned’. Quote me correctly, please. All I was saying was that attitudes toward underage sex in the wake of the sixties ‘sex revolution’ were considerably more relaxed, to the extent that I believe the mother of the girl in question set up the assignation with Polanski. I did not say I approved of it. I was only trying to put the Polanski incident in its permissive context.

            And for what it’s worth, super-groupie Lori Maddox doesn’t seem to have any regrets about her experiences.

          • CA

            I will believe that you do not approve of the incident, but I really do not understand what you are trying to explain to me.

            Because it has been suggested that the mother was possibly okay with pimping out her 13 year old daughter, we should be more understanding of Polanski’s circumstances? That Polanski was just a product of his environment and he was part of the good old boys club (pre-1980’s) that abused children and raped women and we can’t possibly hold him to the standard of law?

            I’m so disturbed by this conversation–I really am. Maybe I am just misunderstanding what you are trying to explain.

          • peter

            I’m not saying that Polanski shouldn’t be held accountable but as holocaust survivor who had recently had his pregnant wife murdered by the Manson Family you have to admit he was coming from a weird place. At the time of the incident he was working on Chinatown along with Jack Nicholson, who was also rumored to be partial to chicken. But the point I was trying to make is that he was hardly the only one, and may have been skapegoated. The gestalt of the time, especially among the LA entertainment industry, was that a mature man having intercourse with the recently nubile wasn’t all that terrible. I’m not apologizing for it. I’m simply making an observation. If you read above, I quoted a line of Tony Robbins’ character from Annie Hall (1976) about the benefits of LA life over New York “sixteen year olds . . twins . . . think if the mathematical possibilities!”

            As I also pointed out above, In Like Flynn’s antics at Hollywood High a generation earlier was indicative of a culture of sexual entitlement.

          • CA

            I do not disagree that we let white men get away with a whole lot prior to the 80’s. I assume your point it to identify how we did not prossicute those men for those behaviors.

      • Zealot

        ABSOLUTELY! I can’t help but wonder why mainstream media and entertainment glorify the child as sex object. Even high fashion does this, actively recruiting and using models who cannot realize in 100 years what their images are being used for, or by whom. You’re so right that all media should be held accountable for these practices, especially when the intent is to profit from sexualizing young people.

        • CA

          Yes–you’ve summed it up better than me. This is the glorification of children as sex objects and it is awful. When I was working in fashion, I saw it all of the time. I was “old” at 23 starting to model and the 16-18 year olds were not in a safe space….that was as recent as the 00’s.

      • Maximus

        Even though you didn’t mention it, I feel a need to defend Buffy and Angel. Yes, when their romance began to develop in Season 1, Buffy was 15, and Angel was ~240. By Season 3, Angel had spent ~100 years in a hell dimension, so the age difference was even greater. Furthermore, Angel (orginal human name: Liam) was 26 or 27 when he was sired, which is still a creepy age to be dating a high schooler.

        It seems problematic, I know. However, the show never presented it as a healthy relationship. The age difference was constantly mentioned, and eventually the characters recognize that they can’t be together.

        What about the age difference of >100 years between Buffy and Spike, you ask? When they started having sex, Buffy (1) was a legal adult, and (2) had spent time in a separate dimension as a higher power, so human standards don’t apply.

        • CA

          Oh man…I was never a Buffy viewer.

          • Maximus
          • CA

            I don’t know…I just kinda missed it I guess. I’ve loved SMG all the way back to her Kendal Heart days on All My Children. I love a vampire theme. Sprinkle that with some good old fashioned teen angst running around in the background, it was like a perfect storm that just blew off the shore and missed me.

          • Maximus

            I would tell you to go watch it on Netflix, but they recently removed both it and Angel for some sick, twisted reason. If you don’t mind spending $20 per season, both shows are available on Amazon. I highly recommend both shows. Buffy is easily the best TV show in history.

          • CA

            I was following you and considering the suggestion until you said, “Buffy is easily the best TV show in history.”

            That’s simply not true…

          • Maximus

            You can’t know that until you’ve seen it for yourself. (Also, more academic publications have been written about Buffy than any other TV show. That’s how much substance the show has.)

    • Dulcis Memoria

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4fb99bacc75933e927e0940146ddc25b243f0a5df068fe4e44eeea8479df8a55.gif
      It’s the window into the subtleties of “grooming” that these videos provide that really makes my skin crawl. This “man on ephebe” trend in porn is seriously getting on my nerves!

    • Sean

      I have no use for this studio, but it has nothing to do with step-dad or real dad sex. The performers are AWFUL and not that attractive. Even the story is ridiculous. That being said, these are ADULTS. This has nothing to do with underage sex in any way. Quite honestly, if two CONSENTING adults, whether they be family members or not, want to fuck, that is up to them.
      I also take great offense to you thinking YOU get the right to decide the limits of free speech. I am disgusted by people who murder, but I watch movies like Monster, Goodfellas and the Godfather trilogy. I watched 9 1/2 Weeks and it didnt make me think to have an affair. I have also seen straight porn and it certainly hasnt made me want to eat or fuck a pussy. I guess these films are what fucked up our youth? NO. Videos, films, music lyrics, books, or paintings are not what fuck up our youth. It is BAD parenting and poor education.

      • Zealot

        You miss the point. The “child” in these particular scenes are presented as being underage…and in some as not consenting to what the “dad” is making him do. That’s sick. And getting off to it is sick. And it’s not about videos corrupting youth. It’s about videos portraying behavior consistent with pedophilia for adults who would seek to engage in it or support their attractions/compulsions to have sex with underage children. There is a huge difference. If you don’t get that, then nothing I can send in response is going to make any difference to you. But don’t come at my like I’m upset that this content is out there, because I know first hand what this does to the minds of some adults and how they use it to objectify and exploit actual children.

    • Nicholas Butler

      Finally, someone with some kind of morals and fucking decency. Bless you.

      • Zealot

        Thanks Nicholas. I don’t really try to be a holier-than-thou kind of person. After all, I know this is porn. But after working primarily with sexually and physically abused children for the past 20 years and interviewing family members who use children in ways chillingly similar to those depicted in these scenes, I just can’t stomach it. You can’t be too lax with this kind of thing because any form of tacit approval will allow it to grow and, sadly, become more emboldened about depicting children as sexual objects (even if the actors are of legal age)….the intent is to further the idea that they’re children. It’s sickening.

        • Nicholas Butler

          It’s fucking foul. The people who participate in that are pedophiles, including the one bottoming, because they themselves are still grown men portraying a child in a sexual manner. They’re all sick, none of em are innocent.

          This just furthers the notion that all gay men also happen to be pedophiles. Not including myself, obviously; never have been, never will be, my mind can’t even fathom how one can find a child/teen sexually appealing with all these grown women and men walking around.

          Still, what do you think about this theory (that all gay men are also pedophiles)? Would you say there’s some truth to it?

  • Sed

    It’s too bad because Austin Xanders is really cute but the theme is to gross to watch. I just can’t do it.

    • James Johnson III

      Thank you. I think so too. He’s adorable but now I can go find scenes of his that don’t make me want to shower with bleach afterwards

    • Phraughy

      He looks 14.

  • Galaxy_Scribe

    President Oaks is here. I’m in.

  • sanfv

    Remember when Billy Santoro said he’d make it his life goal to make Nica Noelle stop filming movies before he took too much meth and beat the crap out of Seth?

    Which model is gonna step their activist pussy up and disavow this?

    I’m also waiting for the huffpo blog post from Nica where she’ll defend this garbage as “Feminist” porn, ramble on for another 700 words before threatening Zach and all our lives for the umpeenth time.

    • Lothar

      Is she invovled in this? I thought she had her own studio IconMale and she only did condom stuff?

    • 2345

      Please help me with this- do you know anything about a SC rumor stating that they have a backlog of scenes over 2 years old (someone mentioned that without going into details)? Is it something all porn studios do? I know some do already, but know nothing about SC. Thank you

  • peter

    Several years ago there was a straight porn series “Family Touch”.

    Some woman commentator on Steve Bannon: “he reminds me of a drunk uncle who asks you to sit on his lap and you’re 15”.

  • Del

    Since this is from the same people behind Mormonboyz are they just going to bring over a lot of the models from that? So far it seems that way. I wonder if they will drag Elder Stewart back for this site.

    • WhimsyCotton

      The whole Mormonboyz thing is actually kind of hot because it’s public knowledge that so many Mormon men go to these ridiculous retreats to overcome their same-sex attraction, but this? This fetishizes the concept of abuse in minors.

      • Two Cents

        That Mormonboyz site does the same thing. It’s an all white site like the Mormon church – well except for Gladys Knight – but I read about the site and they get down with the whole abuse as sexy thing. There’s actually a title called Temple Violation. Yeah, gtho with all that.

        • Scrapple

          Using religion to sell sex does not sit well with me. And I still don’t get how people get all bent out of shape if a model has a tat of a crucifix, a rosary, or some other religious iconography, but are okay with what Mormon Boyz is doing. A real expression of faith is to be mocked and disregarded, but a fake, sexualized expression of faith is to be celebrated? That makes no sense.

          • Two Cents

            I feel the same way my dude! If you hate religion then hate it all when you see. Don’t bust a nut to it and then hate when you see someone say theyre religious. Especially when people don’t see that what they like is all about sexual abuse. These boys don’t even want to have sex in the three little promo clips I saw.

      • peter

        I’ll bet the incidence of same-sex attraction is lower among LDS since unlike other religions they don’t surround sex with Augustinian taboos as do other Christian sects. In fact Mormonism is kind of a fertility cult, and they’re very sex-positive. That’s what those magic undies are all about. They anoint the loins as part of their wedding ceremony (which sounds so hot!)

        The incidence of male same-sex attraction among Wahabi Muslims must be astronomical since they never get to see women without veils until their wedding nights.

    • Donald Horn

      The also need to bring back Elder Foster!

  • McM.
  • McM.
  • AJ

    no wonder Nibiru is coming. This deserves all sorts of judgement. Nasty shit. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/36fe173a359ac93cc7be71f27cf17b0b6248f0ac14a6ae3fe76ae9b76dcdfdf6.jpg

  • Mister Sterious
  • Ferado

    Why does this look like creepypasta film footage?

  • WhimsyCotton
    • Maximus

      It’s aimed at Mimi?!

      • WhimsyCotton

        Mimi doesn’t know anything about this shit. Just like she doesn’t know anything about her ex-fiance’s illegal dealings while they were together.

        • Maximus

          Ooooh! What freshly brewed T is this? You’re talking about the billionaire, right? Is Mariah still with her gay pretend boyfriend (a.k.a. her employed arm-candy) Bryan Tanaka these days?

          • WhimsyCotton

            Apparently, there were some illicit dealings between her ex-fiance and some high ups in Israel or some shit like that. She said she didn’t shit about that and that she was just there to perform.

            As for Tanaka, I don’t think he’s a Caspar Smart. I think he’s giving Mariah what she needs. Fuckboi dick. She’s definitely in that stage of her life. She’s known Tanaka for like over a decade, so I’m sure he’s into her. He’s seen curvy-riah from 2006, Mean Girl-riah from 2008, pregnant AF-riah from 2010, renewed-riah from 2013, and the currently squeezed for life in her Spanx-riah of 2017.

  • scorpio

    How is this even legal? They can say MormonBoyz is about the authority/submission fetish, but in this case there’s only one type of audience they’re going after. Is the site run by Chris Hansen?

    • Pinko of the Grange

      It is legal because every one is a consenting adult and not really related. It is questionable because they seem to try to fool us that those both aren’t true.

      • scorpio

        But is the product legal considering who they’re making it for and how it approves their behavior?

        • That Guy

          That doesn’t really matter. As long as each person is a consenting adult and it isn’t really incest, they’re not really breaking any laws.

          Also, they specify stepfather/stepbrother/stepson, etc. not because of legality, but because credit card companies don’t want to process payments for anything seen as too immoral, which makes it really hard for these companies to make money if they don’t emphasize that the actors are only playing completely unrelated people.

          • scorpio

            How is their “Sleepy Movie Night” video a representation of an 18 year old son?

        • Pinko of the Grange

          Sure there is no law being broke. It is free speech. Its intent isn’t to incite. And some would argue that the voyeuristic aspect may be prophylactic.

          It is like the intentional hiring of a very young looking 18 y/o and doing everything possible to make the model look younger. Questionable ethics but fully legal

  • Cubankid

    When they said “keep it in the family” this isn’t what they meant!

  • gaycuckhubby

    Lol… this is so mild compared to straight incest fantasy studios.

    • It really, really is. That doesn’t mean the points being made aren’t worth discussing across the board, but yeah, this all seems totally fine with the straight porn industry, and this stuff is way more mainstream there.

      • moondoggy

        I mean no disrespect to anyone, and I would totally get why someone who was molested would be offended. But the prudishness of everyone else makes zero sense to me. If these guys had killed their father instead of sucking his dick, and this was basic cable instead of porn, would we even notice this?

        It also fascinates me that straight porn has, to my knowledge, gotten more prudish too. I’ve seen scores of stepdad titles, but the blood-relative scenes seem less prominent. They almost seemed to peak with the Taboo series in the 80s. I’d be curious if there are more recent titles that I’m not aware of, though I only ask rhetorically since anyone who replied with specific titles would sure be burned at the stake.

        • GN

          Speak to someone who’s had years of emotional torment, all because daddy/big brother used to force themselves on them. Ask Zealot, these sad stories are everywhere. You don’t have to be a victim of molestation yourself to sympathize with these people.

          • Zealot

            Thanks GN. I would just add to what you said:
            1. I don’t know what goes on in straight porn. I’m gay and don’t frequent those sites, nor pay attention to that content. But if this exists on that side of the fence, then I feel exactly the same way about it. But it’s illogical to say that because they do it, it should be permitted in gay content. NOPE. I don’t buy it.
            2. Use of children, the image of children or the portrayal of children as sex objects is basically illegal. I’m not sure how that applies to incest scenarios, but I certainly do where children or intentional portrayal of a person as being underage (even if the actual actor doing so is of legal age), amounts to the same thing to a pedophile.
            3. This community already carries the burden of indoctrination of children through sex as a recruitment tool. So in my opinion, this site is about as anti-LGBTQ as is possible, because it supports and confirms that stereotypical notion. When mainstream media gets ahold of this, we’re going to be crucified over it.
            4. Making money from such an enterprise is pathetic.
            5. I’m not a prude, nor do I suspect are you or any of the others who have positively supported your comments, mine and those of others. We just know where the ethical lines here need to be drawn.

          • moondoggy

            I understand that. What I am saying is that anyone can have a personal experience that would make them an unsuitable audience for a particular story. To go the further step of suggesting that merely telling a story is an act of violence, which is clearly what some people here are suggesting, is a reactionary view. How is it any different from a straight man taking umbrage at any gay porn because it reminds him of his own experience of male rape? That is identical to the claim here that consenting incest evokes memories of incest rape.

            You have every right to be offended by this and to express that sense of offense. I’m not being patronizing in saying that, merely stating the fact. But here’s another fact: I am not offended by it, and I defend their right to construct whatever fantasy they want as long as the participants are consenting, even if the characters are implied not to be consenting. Free speech is not free if we impose our personal views on it with the aim of silencing it.

          • Sean

            What does thathave to do with anything., SHould we condemn Frances Ford Coppola because people were killed by the mafia. Maybe we should stop Mel Brooks from making The Producers because to some it is offensiove to laugh about their family members death at the hands of the Nazis. There is a price to pay for freedom. It means there will be people and things that OFFEND.
            I also wonder how many people here ever “played” with another person when they were underage. How many jacked off with a friend (even though they werre both underage) or maybe looked at porn (even though it is illegal) when they were 16. How many bought alcohol or smoked a joint when they were underage?

        • Scrapple

          Yes, if this were basic cable and involved sons killing their fathers, I would for sure notice. And unless there was some reason for that action, like abuse or something, I would not shrug it off like it was nothing.

          • moondoggy

            Law and Order/SVU/Criminal Intent have produced over 1,000 episodes. The number of parents and children who killed one another without justification in that one franchise would take too long to count. You guys are legit sounding like Puritans right now.

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0b86ce92ead4dbbfc3e99c482d90af70652f50acfc8e663ff42ecf022bc18753.gif

          • Scrapple

            And where in any of those episodes are people clapping and cheering over those scenarios and acting like it’s a good thing? In all three of those shows, whenever behavior like that happens it is condemned. I’m not sure why you’re acting like that isn’t the case.

          • moondoggy

            So you’re suggesting that they only have the right to tell those stories because the characters are bothered by the same things that bother you? I’m not being glib — I genuinely don’t understand what people are talking about here. Yes, Law and Order takes a conventional moral stance. That’s not what justifies its existence. Its existence is justified by civil liberties. There are plenty of films (and possibly TV shows — I no longer watch enough TV to know) where violent people meet with ambiguous or no consequences — Frisk, American Psycho, The Killer Inside Me, Taxi Driver, Nightcrawler, Sweet Sweetback’s BaadAssss Song. Hell, even Robert Browning’s “My Last Duchess” is a poetic celebration of murder.

            This is my last attempt to engage this thread because everyone here appears to have made up their minds on this, and I don’t want to spend hours talking past each other. I’m not saying I’m ignoring you — I will read any further direct replies with interest. I’m just not going to spend any more effort on rebuttal. I’ve made my view known and that’s more than enough in a porn thread.

          • Scrapple

            Who suggested that? What I clearly stated is that those depictions would be vilified, as they should be. You presented the idea that children killing parents or vice versa on tv shows happens on tv all the time and nothing gets said about it. Then you listed three shows as a way of proving these depictions are presented with no backlash. That would be false. You will never see an episode of Law & Order where something like this takes place and the characters are all “Oh well. Such is life. Nothing to see here.” Because it doesn’t happen. Even in the movies you mentioned, even if the character(s) didn’t meet a specific end based on their actions, there were still other characters who were pointing out why the behavior is inappropriate.

            I’ve been very clear in stating my issue with this site isn’t the incest factor. Why go the extra step and portray some of these kids as being underage? Why is that necessary to the fantasy? Saying that is inappropriate has nothing to do with being a Puritan, or being a prude, because I’m so far removed from either of those labels. A father sleeping with his son who is apparently too young to know about “big boy underwear” but is old enough to know about inserting a dick into an asshole is supposed to be hot and acceptable? I’m not seeing it.

          • moondoggy

            I’m standing by my decision to (mostly) let this thread go. But I violated my pledge of silence just to say that now that you’ve clarified your view, you’re not even the one with whom I’m primarily disagreeing. Other people are associating incest porn with violence, and that’s the view with which I’m disagreeing.

            Our discussion of art and violence, on which we disagree in part, is becoming too granular for me to continue. I wish you lived nearby because I would totally continue to debate you over coffee.

          • Scrapple

            This coffee takes a pinch of sugar and a whole lot of cream.

          • moondoggy
          • Sean

            How are they portrayed as underage? It is cleasr they made the one model going off to college and the other two clips showed guys who are so not underage they might have children of their own in grade school

          • Scrapple

            You’re right. High School or college age boys wear have to be shown what “big boy underwear” is.

          • Phraughy

            There are scenes where the bottom clearly looks 14. No question about it they are insinuating he is underage.

          • Sean

            The Godfather makes a murderer a hero. Oceans 11 is about a CRIME and it makes them all heros. Clockwork Orange has a crimional as the hero of the book/film. SO I guess we should condemn those as well?

          • Scrapple

            You’re an idiot. I generally try to be more diplomatic in my responses, but I can’t this time. Because you’re an idiot.

    • moondoggy

      You sicken me … you disgust me … are you as turned on as I am right now?

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8a293e309034b23cc01802ae0014be4f6fa07014ad58292ae2a403391bd6415e.gif

    • peter

      Oh, you got that. I’ll bet there are at least a score of movies entitled ‘Kissin’ Cousins!’

  • Green4clover

    What’s the big deal? It’s porn. They are all fake scenarios. The scenes, the men, the boys, and the fucking is hot. I am not ashamed to say I enjoy these vids.

    • Ceecee
    • Two Cents

      Yeah it’s fake my dude, but come on it what it’s depicting. It’s like these sick ah that get off to watching race play. Yeah we know the white dude probably not a white supremacist but what does it say about a person whose white that likes it. What does it say about you that you like some nasty pedo ish like this. It ain’t about what legal it’s about what’s nasty and this is straight up nasty.

  • Maximus

    It’s creepy enough when the step-sons are depicted as eager, adult participants, but Zach’s descriptions make these scenarios sound—I can’t actually bring myself to watch the video links—non-consensual. The sibling/cousin scenarios aren’t as troubling given the relative equality—as opposed to the inherently unequal power dynamic of a father-son or adult-minor relationship—of the participants, but again, if the scenarios are non-consensual, then they’re not much better. When is American society going to stop regarding children as property?

    • I’ve watched the scenes in question, and the one that’s probably creepiest doesn’t have anything in it that even implies lack of consent. It’s creep factor isn’t even because of the roleplay aspect. If they’d just gotten rid of the kids underwear, it would’ve been your run-of-the-mill step-incest porn.

      Then again, mainstream straight porn is absolutely LOADED with women in underwear made for teenage girls, fucking their stepdads, having sex on a schoolbus… the whole school uniform thing has been around in porn for a long time. Part of me thinks we wouldn’t be having the same conversation if this was straight porn, but that’s probably just because it’s become so normalised.

      • Maximus

        The fact that straight porn sexualizes minors doesn’t make this gay porn studio any more acceptable.

        • I don’t believe I said that (and elsewhere on this article I make that exact same point). What I’m saying here is that I don’t see any proof of correlation between porn like this existing and people who abuse children, because sexualised women wearing school uniforms is so mainstream it’s not even just a porn thing. There’s no reason to believe the majority of men who find that attractive are then going out and abusing children, just like people who like their partners to dress in leather dog masks and woof for them aren’t necessarily going to go abuse some dogs. There is a big difference between roleplay between two consenting adults, and paedophilia.

  • I don’t mind the whole ‘family members fucking’ genre in gay porn, but even I find this gross. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/332665385f3281ea79da808610cf9283e92ad8578a60af4819b3df98062d1758.jpg

  • Rob36
  • We all seem completely fine with twincest porn any time it comes up in conversation on this blog (most of the time we even celebrate it), but actors *pretending* to be not-even-blood-relatives? Evil! The collective hypocrisy is astounding.

    • Jason

      Nope, “twincest” porn is still incestuous, and gross.

      Also the ick factor is not necessarily that they are blood relatives, it is the implied power relationship. Stepdads are often still a father figure.

    • gaycuckhubby

      ???

      • GN

        Our objections are over the power dynamic, and while two 20-something twins fucking is indeed incest and not appealing to many, they are consenting peers of comparable intellect. It is not being portrayed that one twin is exploiting/ taking advantage of the weaker one by forcing him into the sex. Portraying a “dad’ as voyeristically molesting his “son” is a whole nother bowl of wax. This website is clearly trying to intimate a molestation is being acted out in front of you.

        • So the argument is that a completely fake power dynamic performed by actors of consenting age is worse than a real-life incestuous relationship with the perception of an equality that may or may not be there? Just because we aren’t shown any abuse, just because they’re the same age, and just because nobody’s using the word “daddy” or dressed in, say, a school uniform – that doesn’t mean you’re not watching the results of abuse or live action abuse.

          But because they’re just having incestuous sex on camera instead of playing out an incestuous scenario, we can completely avoid thinking about what goes on in their real lives, and fap to it anyway. Doesn’t seem much better to me.

    • Scrapple

      I have no issues with twins appearing in porn together. Do I want to see them interacting with each other sexually? Nope.

    • beefcupcake

      I know right? These are the same faggots who most probably jerked off to the Peters twins 1000 times already.

  • T2TheB

    From whence comes the modern (recent?) fascination with and acceptability of incest or approximations of of it? Moreover, we’re talking gay sex here, so what is the point of veiling the incest-among-consenting-adults theme in the “step” artifice?

    Here’s my idea for an incestuous porn scene:
    Have one partner incarcerated, the other visits, and the prison guards put the two in a room whereby they “go at it” in a conjugal visit. “Rinse and repeat” with fathers and sons, uncles and nephews, siblings, in-laws, cousins, and other conceivable (or is “inconceivable” a better word) combinations. The scene idea works too for heterosexual porn.

  • Jason

    Doesn’t really help the horrible notion some people have that gay men are paedophiles and/or sleep with male family members. Incest, implied or not, is not a turn on for me, and just because the characters are not male does not make this gay porn. But I guess there’s a market for it or they would not make it.

    • Sean

      Yes because that is only done by gay men

      Sincerely

      Woody Allen

      • Jason

        Point taken, but there is a much bigger idea that gay men recruit and prey on younger men/boys

  • peter

    This would be the perfect site for a Brad Chase comeback!

  • CamCam

    There is something about this whole concept that is kinda creepy to me. Even some of the performers look too much like actual children. That’s not sexy no matter how you promote it.

  • Ant

    All I wanna know is who the dad with the framed glasses is. That’s it.
    Am I being indifferent?

    “Get over it” – Joan Rivers

  • Rotflool this is the most unrealistic thing I’ve ever seen in my life I am so bored with this I can’t believe anybody would actually jerk off to something so insipid. Oh well at least I now know that there’s such a thing of little boy underwear I had no clues I assumed little boy underwear would be for kids and certainly not usable by an 18 year old.

  • On the Second Glance of this video it really bothered me did this guy who is pretending to be an 18 year old boy has been deliberately gussied up to look about 11 or 12 and the underwear he’s wearing he’s clearly nothing a teenage boy would ever dream of wearing unless they had no self-esteem whatsoever.

    On that and it is clear what this is it is a Shameless grab to find pedophiles this is not a gay porn site this is a site to titillate pedophiles but stay strangely on the correct side of the law.

  • a b

    Whenever you kill one Nica Noelle, two are born from her ashes

  • R.A.M.J

    Thats the most disturbing shit i’ve seen. People may attempt to drag me for this, but this shit is why the far right seems to think that the LGBT community is a bunch of sex crazed pedo’s. Because the fact there is a market for a porn studio catering to incest and 18 y/o guys who geniunely look like they are in jr. high.

    • have you seen the shit straight porn sites make? they are not better than this, believe me.
      And honestly, who gives a shit what some fucked up right wingers think?

  • Crymeariver

    This website is from the same owners as mormonboys, and it’s all the same shit all over again including a lot of fake fucking on camera. Take a look at the fucking in the scene “Doctor’s Office”. The docter in white shirt is fucking his boy without his limp dick even being close to his ass, around 17:00.

  • David Campbell

    Wow. Lots of Puritanical rage going on in these comments.

  • Stuart

    The ones that at least look like an adult I can go along with, the young looking one is a big fat no. Porn should not make you feel like the dirty old pervert down the street your parents told you to never talk to as a kid.