Gay Porn Stars Come Out In Support Of Jarec Wentworth’s Extortion Plot!

Posted March 24, 2015 by with 142 comments

NSV032_S1_JarecWentworth_horzAffil_3

While gay porn star Jarec Wentworth sits in federal lock-up awaiting pre-trial on charges of attempting to extort at least $1,000,000 from someone with whom he apparently had a secretive sexual relationship, a small but growing number of his gay porn star pals are coming to his defense.

Str8UpGayPorn exclusively broke the story of Jarec Wentworth’s arrest on Sunday. By Monday, performer Seth Santoro had taken to Twitter to remind his followers that there are “two sides to every story”:

extortion3 And despite the fact that FBI agents recovered a loaded gun from Wentworth’s car after arresting him, gay porn powerbottom Brandon Moore would still prefer to hang with him over the victim:

extortion2

Wentworth allegedly received over $500,000 and an Audi valued at $180,000 from his victim before going back to him and demanding another $1,000,000 in cash, and a condo in Los Angeles. As greedy (not to mention insanely stupid) as that sounds, Billy Santoro sees it differently:

extortion1Other than the FBI agents, Wentworth, and the victim, no one is privy to the details of this case or what (if anything) the victim did to “deserve” being extorted. But if we’re going to make presumptions, isn’t it the most reasonable to presume that Wentworth and his victim are both fucking awful?

Diesel Washington, putting things into perspective:

extortion4extorition5

  • gnormie

    well no one ever expected morality from their porn stars

    • Luca

      why?

    • andrew

      Are we who pay to watch the porn stars have sex, more moral than the porn stars?

    • FrenchBug

      Promiscuity does not equate immorality.
      Morality comes from the values that drive your life and how you treat others. I know plenty of monogamous people who are repulsive human beings. And you can suck hundreds of dicks and be a decent caring honest human being worthy of respect and admiration.

      • Trey LEone

        Ain’t that the truth honey!!!

  • funster

    Maybe he’ll learn that being good looking doesn’t entitle to him to be an ass hole

  • sxg

    Lol you can always count on Billy Santoro for getting it wrong! Numerous sources have already mentioned to me what a piece of shit of a human being Teofil is, so that part is right. As for the victim, we don’t know and we may never know. But if he wad truly an asshole as equal to Jarec, he would have never given Jarec the 500k and the Audi and would have called the FBI right from the start.

    • n24rc

      Well, if you have other examples of extortion by Teofil, or other issues, please share with us so we can make our own judgement instead of relying on yours.

      • sxg

        Some things I don’t mind releasing, other things I keep to myself because I was asked to. These are my opinions based on the information I know.

        • n24rc

          cryptic answers. based on whose benefit – the producers who know, or the people he’s worked with?

        • FrenchBug

          As I said on the other thread, I have heard plenty of people mentioning that there are stories like that out there and I’m dying to hear them – at least the ones that can be made public now that, well, the cat is pretty much out of the bag on that guy.

        • McM.

          That’s fair. You know information, but you want to keep the confidence and trust of the person that initially told you.

          With how info comes to light when things like this go down, I’m sure what you’re hinting at will click with people. Then the question to you will change from “What do you know about them?” to “Bitch, how did you keep that secret inside!?!”

  • john

    pleaseeee

  • AustinWilde

    LOL what

  • michael

    Billy Santoro is a stupid twat so, it’s no surprise he supports Jarek. He’s probably envious. His last 10 clients probably didn’t have $1000.00 between them to extort.

  • BoomPow

    If Billy Santoro is so worried about being extorted by clients, maybe he should find a line of work where people don’t extort each other on a regular basis. If he really believes what he’s saying, how sleazy do you have to be to tolerate that kind of behavior from your shall we say, your co-workers.

  • Todd

    Details please …..what exactly do the ‘johns’ extort these porn stars for ???’

    https://str8upgayporn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Jed-Athens-gaping-cum-dumpster-hole-630×280.png

  • DrunkEnough

    Although Jarec/Jarek looks so oily and slippery that he makes my computer screen shiny and my cock limp, one of these days one of these trashy porn stars is going to get out of his charges and sue the shit out of the porn blogs for proclaiming guilt before a conviction and not using the word “allegedly” enough. Guilty or not (and my money is on “guilty”), a sleazoid like Jarek would be opportunistic enough to go after bloggers, crying slander, should, heaven forbid, this accusation not go to trial based on some technicality. Until he’s safely locked up, I’ll be laughing mercilessly at fuckwits like Brandon Moore.

    • sxg

      If FOX news can consistently get away with the shit they say and still call themselves a news channel, then I think Zach will be ok.

    • Rickster Rickster

      technically he’s a public figure. the charging documents speak for themselves. he’s toast and his supporters among his fellow whores are stupid fools.

      • DrunkEnough

        Public figure or not, you can’t definitively say a person is guilty of a crime until a court says so. It’s basic libel law. (Not that I want to give any porn criminals defense tips.)

        • Um no — while it would be libel to say the person was found guilty, it’s not libel to say that the person is guilty. While the difference may seem minute to you, it’s actually quite huge.

          If what you’re saying were true, OJ could’ve sued the majority of the U.S. population.

          • DrunkEnough

            OJ WAS convicted—in civil court. No use explaining law to commenters on a porn blog. Carry on, you’re entertaining.

          • Child, please.

            No one is convicted of anything in civil court, they can only be found legally responsible.

            You can try to explain law as much as you’d like. The problem is you know nothing about law. You are guilty of being a fucking idiot. We await your lawsuit.

          • DrunkEnough

            …and it’s why you can call him a killer without getting nailed for it. But you go on promoting your ratchet parasite porn site, queen. I’ll be watching you from a distance as you get your panties in a bunch.

          • Obvious idiot steady gets more and more obvious so he resorts to hurling insults as a pitiful means of deflection.

            Obvious idiot.

        • Estelle

          Yeah, I’m sure Bill Cosby is getting ready to sue every blog and website who have called him a rapist.

    • zach

      Not sure which blogs you’re referring to, as you won’t find a single example of me proclaiming anyone’s guilt before they were convicted on this blog.

      At the same time, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with expressing an opinion about someone’s guilt or innocence. For example: Jarec is guilty as fuck, in my opinion.

    • DRW11

      Clearly he is guilty. I mean the texts came from his phone and he was there in person with the undercover accepting a title for the Audi and going to the trunk about to accept 1 million dollars……how could he not be guilty????

  • Luca

    it’s interesting how they really turn the issue in a one-percenter fight against the rich exploiters.
    Breaking news: you wouldn’t HAVE YOUR JOB without those very rich people that pay you!

    • La Bambi

      In Marxist theory the working class is exploited by the capitalist. The proletariat’s only value is his labor, which is commodified and priced by the capitalist. A sex worker would not fuck their john freely, therefore they are captive to wage exploitation.

      Do you don’t have to believe Marxist theory, but Brandon Moore’s application of it was correct.

      PS: Those very rich people wouldn’t be rich if they didn’t profit off others’ labor.

      • Luca

        The small problem in your explanation here is that the wages are set by the workers themselves (it’s the escort that decides the fee, and frankly, 250-300$/hour is not exactly proletariat’s level). So there is not much exploitation in itself here.

        • La Bambi

          Both Capitalism and Marxism hold that workers don’t set the wages, the free market does. You can only set it at what the market is willing to pay. Sex workers can make good money obviously, but it still is a mini-Marxist situation. I also see sex work as one of the only professions where an individual can own ‘the means of production’, you make money of your own services and work for yourself. I don’t think sex work has to be exploitive, at least no more exploitive than any wage labor.

      • Kim K’s Kute Koochy✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        If Marx sucked some cocks, communism wouldnt be so bleak & bland.

  • Dazzer

    Could someone explain this to me – how do you extort money from a widely known gay porn actor who openly escorts?

    I’m probably paraphrasing Ricky Sinz here, but I believe he once made the comment: ‘Once you’ve agreed to let everyone see you have a dick up your ass, you’re never going to be elected President’.

    What power does the john have over the escort? Also, what the hell are you extorting out of the escort? Sex possibly, but money is a massive stretch of logic.

    I like escorts and I respect them for the job they do – but I’ve never thought an escort had more money than me. And that’s not an insult to them as a profession/trade. I’ve met escorts who earn a lot more money than me – but they’re few and far between (and usually screwing elderly Republican Congressmen).

    I can kind of understand the point Brandon Moore is trying to make – but the class warfare idea only goes so far unless he expands on his ideas. I don’t think it works – but it was an interesting point to make.

    With Billy and Seth Santoro, I’m just looking at them, shaking my head and thinking: ‘What the fuck?’

    As ever, this site makes me a complete and utter Diesel Washington fan. Despite his inherent sexiness, we’d be incompatible sexually. But I would definitely buy him a night of drinks if I went to New York. The man never fails to make me laugh stupidly – and in a good way. The man has wit. He’s got a fantastic body, but he’s got funnier bones (see film Funny Bones for reference).

    • Kim K’s Kute Koochy✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

      ok, this isn’t directly related to your own financial status, considering the US median individual income is $32,000/yr and upper middle-class professions make ~ $67,348, lots of escorts are quite well off & have more money than their johns.

    • Trey LEone

      looks like diesel has a new client!
      and less competition!!!
      make it rain gurl… make it rain!

  • Rickster Rickster

    does anyone really care what whores opinions are on anything?

    • gnormie

      other whores

    • Kim K’s Kute Koochy✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

      “has been” or “never was” whores

    • andrew

      I’m certainly not on Team Jarec, but “whores” have the same rights to express their opinions as do the “Johns” who employ them or the voyeurs, like us, who enjoy and often pay to watch them have sex. Your holier than thou attitude sucks.

      • Rickster Rickster

        what holier than thou attitude? I called them what they themselves so readily admit they are in public forums.

        • andrew

          I haven’t heard many porn stars and or escorts call themselves “whores”. It is a particularly offensive word. When using that term to describe other people you are indeed being self righteous. Furthermore, a fair minded person listens to the opinions of all and doesn’t exclude the opinions of some because they think their occupation to be unholy or dirty. Of course, all the while enjoying watching them have gay porn sex.

          • Rick Santorum

            I don’t mind the term…especially since I probably make much, much more than Rickster for doing far, far less.

      • BoomPow

        Why do you keep chastising people for their holier than thou attitude’s when your comments are more holier than thou than anyone’s?

        • andrew

          Criticizing someone for using demeaning language to describe others is not holier than thou. When guys watch porn stars, sometimes even pay to watch porn stars, get aroused by porn stars and beat off to images of porn stars and then think they are superior to porn stars, that’s holier than thou.

          • BoomPow

            So how would you characterize someone who spends their time chastising people for the comments they make on the internet. Would you say that person was a crusader? A savior perhaps? You’re the very definition of someone who is acting holier than thou.

          • andrew

            I am a guy who was defending the right of porn stars to express their opinions. They were under attack by Rickster who says that the opinions of porn stars, “whores” on “anything” have no value. I was reacting to the holier than thou attitude of Rickster, who although he watches porn actors have sex, uses the demeaning word “whores: to describe them. In what way are we viewers of porn, enablers of porn, morally superior to those who act in porn?

          • BoomPow

            I don’t think anybody is morally superior to anybody else. I’m not the moral police andrew and neither are you, but you’re acting like it.

          • andrew

            My opposition wasn’t to people who disagreed with the porn stars opinions. I disagree with their defense of Jarec. My opposition was to Rickster, who called them by the demeaning term “whores” and indicated that their opinions had no value because they are “whores”. My opposition is to people who love porn and beat off to porn but think they are morally superior to the porn stars because they make porn.

    • zach

      Marginalizing someone and their opinion just because they’re a “whore” is so lazy and so dumb. You’re on a porn blog commenting under what I presume is a fake name, so what does that say about you and your opinion? You could take apart these “whores'” opinions and disagree with them on so many different levels, based on facts or your own personal opinions, but instead you take the easy way out and just pull the “whore” card. Lame.

      • Rickster Rickster

        my name is richard and my nickname is rickster. so I do not seem to be hiding behind a name. le comte de st. germaine was too long for twitter and oxnard mantavlo was already taken so I settled for rickster on my twitter account which is tied to my disqus account which has my profile hidden so I can comment on both sites like this and political and news sites without having to put up with right wing nut jobs attacking me for coming here. using this name does not lessen my opinions on anything, especially these people, one whit. they ain’t using their real names either now are they. they made the most assholish defenses of this alleged extortionist so as to boggle the mind with their insipid lame brained banality. so I asked a rhetorical question using a term for them which in their cases most certainly applies. and it seems some people agree with what I said. so it wasn’t so lame now was it.

        • La Bambi

          Does anyone really care about an anonymous internet commenter’s opinion on anything?

          • Rickster Rickster

            hey, he made his comment and I replied. why shouldn’t I defend myself against his unwarranted attack? and your reply is rather the height of hypocrisy don’t you think.

          • andrew

            I think the “height of hypocrisy” is when someone who watches porn stars have sex, maybe even enables them by subscribing, gets aroused by the actions of the porn stars, beats off to the images of the porn stars and then calls them “whores” and indicates that their opinions on “anything” have no value. In what way are we porn viewers morally superior to porn actors?

          • Rickster Rickster

            that is not hypocrisy. they’re whores. deal with it.

          • andrew

            What does that say about you, who watch them “whoring”, get aroused by it and yet pretend to be morally superior to them?

          • Rickster Rickster

            I am morally superior. hell, I can tell by the way you run your fucking mouth off I’m morally superior to you. and for your information I’ve never seen these particular whores do anything. you seem to forget these defenders are all PROSTITUTES. they don’t just do things on film they’re HOOKERS. therefore they are whores. now go dig yourself a hole and crawl in.

          • andrew

            What is the difference between guys who have sex on screen for money and guys who have sex on and off screen for money? Do you take the same morally superior attitude toward the guys who only have sex on screen for money, as you do to the guys who have sex off screen for money? Do you call them all by the demeaning term “whore” and think all of their opinions are valueless? You may be morally superior to some of the porn stars and some of the porn stars may be morally superior to you. Stop generalizing.

          • Rickster Rickster

            they’re all whores. but there is a difference of degree. now buzz off. please note you are defending the opinions of assholes who think blackmail is fine and dandy.

          • andrew

            “they’re all whores” who you, me and a lot of gay guys love to watch have hot sex. The difference between you and many of the rest of us, is that we appreciate their work and don’t think ourselves morally superior to them because they make the hot sex scenes that we love to watch. Don’t try and change the subject. I was not defending the opinions of the porn stars, I was defending their right to express their opinions. I clearly don’t agree with their defense of Jarec. I defend their right to express their opinions and not be called demeaning names like “whore” by guys like you who love watching guys have hot sex, but think they are morally superior to the porn stars they beat off too.

          • GMC

            Your autism may be stopping you from noticing this but somebody with the puritanical and classicist view on sex work even being on this site or even being gay for that matter is in itself is IRONY so thick you could make a spoon stand up in it and just have to laugh in your face BWAHAHAHHhhhhaaa!!!

          • Rickster Rickster

            that is pure stupidity and laughable.

          • GMC

            So glad you agree!See there you can spot irony, next class well try to tackle sarcasm.

          • GMC

            HELLO everybody by definition a whore is an individual who gets paid for sex, period.The more important point that needs to be made is not that the word is somehow an insult but that there IS NOT one thing wrong with being a whore. Wentworth stopped being the extortion victim’s whore the minute he picked the coins up off the dresser and hit the door. Whores never try to negotiate the fee after the nuts are blown and the good ones never forget to get that scrilla up front.

          • Rickster Rickster

            good grief.

          • Rickster Rickster

            ya kow what? you assume an awful lot don’t ya bub.

          • andrew

            Do I assume that you enjoy watching gay porn and beating off to gay porn and yet think you are morally superior to the porn actors? You bet your ass I do. Because you know its true.

          • Rickster Rickster

            you sound like a pimp. or a whore monger. can’t decide which.

          • andrew

            You are a guy who watches porn, probably enables porn by subscribing, gets aroused by watching the porn stars have sex, beats off to the images of porn stars having sex, all the while deluding yourself into thinking that you are morally superior to the porn stars, because they are involved in making the porn that you love. LOL LOL LOL

          • La Bambi

            Do they not have irony where you come from?

          • Rickster Rickster

            I’m autistic, autistics don’t recognize irony. now there’s your answer to your rhetorical question.

        • John Reed

          This is the saddest thing I’ve read on the internet today :(

          • Rickster Rickster

            boo hoo hoo. your reply was the saddest thing I’ve seen. I really hate it when people like the one I replied to take a simple little rhetorical yet FACT BASED question and turn it into a big deal bringing up a lot of shit that doesn’t matter one bit in the least. so you can cram your sadness. the only sad thing is that oxnard montalvo was already taken on twitter. if that was the saddest thing you’ve read then I’d get myself checked out by a shrink damn fast. a plane load of people slammed into a mountain.

  • Todd

    I don’t think Billy, Seth or Brandon need to ‘save the date’ for a court appearance as Jarec’s character witnesses.

  • DRW11

    Uh I thought billy santoro didnt escort and who would extort him and why? I don’t care if it’s the pope who banks extorted. It’s not right and it’s so obvious what happened. They were having a little fling or whatever, guy didn’t want to see him anymore for whatever reason, and banks is pissed and bitter cause he’s not going to get anymore $$$ from him. He was a idiot. Was wrong to take any $ or thing but should have took his 500,000 and car and shut the fuck up. Like seriously

    • funster

      Exactly. The douche bag was even even defending mike dozer at one point and blaming the under age victim. He’s a tool

  • this is my truth….after reading some of these comments…basically what these “porn actors” are saying is: Good job Jarec/Jarek/Teofil Brank too bad you got caught; also thanks for showing us how far we can go with milking the next person out of money.

  • sxg

    ok finally seeing the twitter posts and I lol’d at this from Billy: “What goes around comes around #teamjarec.” Yes the celebrity certainly got his comeuppance. He lost 500k and a 180k Audi while Jarec lost his whole life and identity! Billy has an odd way of seeing things, but then again I don’t expect much from a guy who wants to blame a a 15 year old more than a pedophile! He’s a perfect example why pornstars are not known for their intelligence.

    And Diesel has it right. Teofil got away with 500k and a 180k Audi and he wanted more. He has his own greed to blame for this.

    • RealityCheck

      i’m sure Donald was smart enough to write off those loses as “business expenses”, that what many rich folk do. And if we look at it from a financial standpoint, those losses weren’t even 1% of his networth. I mean he’s been funding Jerec & many other pornstars, so I’m sure to him that wasn’t really that serious.

      And yes, Billy is less than smart, in his comment.

      Donald has lost a little bit of face, but he’ll quickly bounce back, & move on with his life with his wealth & new pornstars to mess with. While Jerec will be imprisoned for a considerable amount of time. By the time he gets out, his looks would probably fade, he’d really get raped in prison & none but the lowest rung porn company would hire him.

      And I’m sure by then Billy won’t be Jerec’s “friend”.

      Diesel is usually controversial for some of the foolish remarks he makes in the media, but Jerec was being greed & that lead to his downfall. But I’m guessing that Diesel wishes he had a sugar daddy like Donald in his back pocket.

    • RealityCheck

      i’m sure Donald was smart enough to write off those loses as “business expenses”, that what many rich folk do. And if we look at it from a financial standpoint, those losses weren’t even 1% of his networth. I mean he’s been funding Jerec & many other pornstars, so I’m sure to him that wasn’t really that serious.

      And yes, Billy is less than smart, in his comment.

      Donald has lost a little bit of face, but he’ll quickly bounce back, & move on with his life with his wealth & new pornstars to mess with. While Jerec will be imprisoned for a considerable amount of time. By the time he gets out, his looks would probably fade, he’d really get raped in prison & none but the lowest rung porn company would hire him.

      And I’m sure by then Billy won’t be Jerec’s “friend”.

      Diesel is usually controversial for some of the foolish remarks he makes in the media, but Jerec was being greed & that lead to his downfall. But I’m guessing that Diesel wishes he had a sugar daddy like Donald in his back pocket.

  • Kim K’s Kute Koochy✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    What kind of “leverage” can Billy Santoro’s clients even have to extort him? What were the demands?
    Must be sth like “if you dont let me breed your ass 10 times for free, I’ll post your birth year or real dick side on Twitter”

    • FrenchBug

      That was going to be my question too. Their equivalence makes no sense.
      I am sure there are plenty of scammy clients who withhold part of the pay for lame reasons or try stuff they have not business trying to pull off but how does any of it justify threatening to out (and publish private material) someone else for $1 million dollars????
      At the risk of being hella lame, two wrongs do not make a right.

      • Kim K’s Kute Koochy✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        Neither withholding payments or pulling off some sex acts is extortion though

        • FrenchBug

          I agree. I am just trying to understand what he might be “thinking”.

        • Mike Julius

          Yes, but he probably doesn’t know what extortion means exactly, so he’s equating it to cheating. He probably means he’d be a billionaire fro ever client that wrote him a bad check or didn’t pay him at all. But if he’d be a billionaire from that, that’s a LOT of nickels. Does he get fucked in his sleep? Because if he’s not even awake to meet the clients, no wonder they leave without paying.

          • Nic

            Ever heard of hyperbole? You know…an obvious and intentional exaggeration to make a point.

          • Mike Julius

            Yes, but the hyperbole usually makes sense first. Something that doesn’t make sense taken to the extreme is just extremely non-nonsensical.

          • Kim K’s Kute Koochy✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

            hahahah Thanks for pointing out the possibility of Billy not knowing what “extortion” means :) AFAIK, he’s a born & raised American w at least 1 college degree.
            Don’t think this was a “hyperbole” either

          • Mike Julius

            I graduated from college too and some of my fellow graduates were dumb as rocks.

            You can barely graduate and still be considered a graduate, you know.

            The last semester I was there, someone I knew was graduating too (because he asked this question during senior seminar) asked me the difference between metaphorically and figuratively.

            Just because he has a college degree does not mean he’s also in possession of a stellar intellect. Nice try, though.

    • moondoggy

      Trying to make his tweet make sense is making my brain hurt.

      • Kim K’s Kute Koochy✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        The brainless always go around trying to hurt other people’s brains.

  • Scrapple

    I can’t with this. It’s like Goldilocks and the Three Messy Bears. The messiest is definitely Billy. He thinks extorting/hustling an exorbitant sum from someone is commendable, but sleeping with a Black guy is the worst thing ever?

    It’s times like this when I remember hoe logic is not to be understood. It is to be ridiculed and dismissed.

  • Pearl Clutcher

    No, I don’t assume both are awful. I dunno without having seen any evidence – just allegations.

  • Dave

    I find it hilarious and ridiculous these wonderful stand up, pillars of the community, citizens of the world known as “pornstars” & “escorts” believe that extorting money is justifiable in ANY situation whatsoever that they are actually defending this guys actions…they supposedly do it to us all the time so it’s ok if we do it to them in return…WAH!!! fucking WAH!!!. You all need to collectively get over yourselves. You guys have NO MORALS whatsoever, the same type that extort money from ordinary people through their fraudulent go fund me campaigns. Should stick to what your best at fucking & sleeping with people for money to make a living & then shut the fuck up!!!

    • andrew

      Your response, like some of the others on this line, to Santoro’s absurd defense of Jarec is just a bit holier than thou. You “righteous folks+ may say that porn stars have no morals. Surely you realize that other “righteous folks” say that we viewers, enablers, of the porn stars careers have no morals. I suggest coming down from your pulpit.

      • Dave

        hahaha that’s funny

        • BoomPow

          It’s hilarious how that guy is coming down on your righteousness from high atop his pulpit. Total hypocrite.

          • andrew

            “that guy” isn’t calling other people demeaning names. I’m just pointing out how self righteous it is for any of us, who love watching our gay porn, to talk like we are superior to those who act in gay porn.

          • BoomPow

            The thing is, your calling people out for being self righteous and acting superior while sitting atop of your high horse being all self righteous and acting like your superior. People have opinions that vary from yours. What makes you the judge and jury about what other people have to say regarding the matter? Would you prefer people edit themselves and only make comments that don’t upset your delicate sensibilities? Never mind, I already know the answer.

          • andrew

            I get annoyed by SOME of the posters on these gay blogs who love their gay porn, watch it, beat off to it and then think that the gay porn stars are beneath them. Call them demeaning names. Too bad if you don’t like me pointing out how hypocritical it is for guys to beat off to gay porn and then think they are superior to the guys they beat off watching.

          • BoomPow

            You’re not going to change anybodies mind. I don’t have a problem with you pointing out whatever you feel you need to point out. I’m just saying, you’re doing the very thing you’re accusing others of doing. I actually happen to agree with you for the most part. People are judgmental by nature and view sex workers as having lower moral standards than they do to make them feel better about themselves. Fuck em…

          • andrew

            There is a big difference between someone like Rickster, who calls porn stars “whores” and says there opinions on “anything” have no value, and someone like me, in this case, who is pointing out the holier than thou attitude of someone who watches porn yet thinks himself morally superior to those who act in porn. I am not claiming to be morally superior to Rickster. I am pointing out that his arrogant and superior attitude toward porn stars, who he probably enjoys watching, is offensive and wrong. I think we may have ALMOST come to a meeting of the minds. From this recent back and forth, it is pretty obvious that we both like a good debate.

          • Mike Julius

            No, you’re two sides of the same holy coin.

          • andrew

            Who’s heads and who’s tails. Answer carefully Mike. We are both very opinionated and will come after you, if you chose the wrong answer. LOL

          • Mike Julius

            Yeah, fuck those people. Sex workers don’t deserve that kind of derision, especially when those same people beat off in the dark watching their work. I think dismissing someone completely just because they use their bodies to make money is wrong and I want to agree with Andrew completely, but the way he’s wording things is just as judgmental.

          • BoomPow

            You’re absolutely right. Is there a moral barometer that I don’t know about that measures morality on a scale by profession? If there were, lawyers, politicians, and cops, would be on the bottom, not pornstars.

            Hell, I’ve been a slutty whore at different times in my life, so I actually don’t have a problem with words like “hooker,” “slut,” or “whore,” used as descriptors. It’s the derogatory tone, and demeaning nature of the comments I find fucking awful. Engaging the assholes that make that type of comment is a losing proposition, and never leads to anything productive.

            Andrew’s not an asshole so I was trying to nudge him along a bit because his misguided protestations make him kinda look like one. However, after interacting with him, I don’t think he possesses enough self awareness to understand what he’s doing.

          • Mike Julius

            Yeah, except now I’m judging him for judging that guy for judging sex workers. Where does it end? Where?!

            http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Scared-Fry-Screams-In-Atlantic-Underwater-On-Futurama.gif

            lol

          • BoomPow

            I actually wrote the long version of that in a comment I posted about 10 minutes ago. The progression was porn star, being judged by judgy commenters, being judged by other judgy commenter. It ended when I actually tried to absolve myself from the judgment label by stating I wasn’t the moral police.

          • andrew

            The difference between you, Mike Julius and me is that unlike Rickster and a few others, we are not hurling demeaning names at people and denying their right to even have their opinions considered.

          • andrew

            That sounds just a little condescending guy.

          • Mike Julius

            Calling someone “holier than thou” isn’t demeaning. Do you know what demeaning means? (By the way, that question was demeaning, if that help remind you.)

  • Face Palm

    What could the john possible extort from one of these guys? They all air their dirty laundry on social media anyway, what else is left?

  • jacko9tails

    Everybody reaps what they sow.

  • McM.

    For everyone wondering what leverage a John could have on a known porn performer/escort, it is not revealing they fuck for money b/c that’s common knowledge, it can usually be about the “extra” things escorts do that they would rather be kept between themselves and the client. And some of those extras can mar a guy’s porn persona and limit career opportunities. Like for instance, if a few years ago a video showed a Colt exclusive being a cum dump for a client, that studio would likely act due to their policy of not having models with bareback personas. (NOTE: This NEVER happened, I just presented it as a hypothetical.)

    To give a specific example, and this was a long time ago, but I once saw a photo album belonging to an older gentleman – he was muscular, very good looking, and had absolutely no problem getting handsome young men on his own – and it was filled with pictures of local escorts he had hired. He had a peculiar turn-on, but could only get off if the other person was paid to do it. So after fucking these muscular escorts, he would offer them a stupid amount of money to turn them into diaper babies. He would also film and/or photo-document their activities. Now, if any of these guys had gotten into porn I doubt they would like if clear videos and pictures of them being burped and “changed” surfaced on the internet. Along with ruining a hyper-masculine image (he had a type) the evidence may influence the sales of scenes they appear in, and then place with a niche audience should they continue porn.

    • Rickster Rickster

      there is a senator named David Vitter who would love being his diaper baby.

      • andrew

        Isn’t Vitter into women?

    • BoomPow

      That’s a poorly drawn analogy. You can take your logic, and apply it to anybody engaging in untoward (extra,) behavior with anybody else and it would apply. Porn people don’t have exclusivity on engaging with anybody that might want to take them down. In fact, a John would be less likely to out themselves than a civilian, in order to take someone down. Privacy is a big reason why people hire hookers.

      • McM.

        Yes, you can apply it to just about anyone b/c extortion is about control, not just money. Extracting property, goods, and services from a person through coercion is also extortion.

  • Zealot

    Jarec’s using his victim’s fear of being outed to extort money, cars or a candy bar for that matter is reprehensible (not to mention profoundly illegal). Santoro’s defense of his actions is surprising, especially given the fact he got caught. As Jarec didn’t get away with a damn thing, praising, supporting, or defending his colossal failure is puzzling to say the least. I’ll defend with my last breath any person’s decision to use their bodies as they see fit…and if that means doing porn (YAY) or escorting…more power to ’em. But I do make a distinction when those gifts are used as a means to emotionally, physically or financially fuck people over.

  • RF

    Lol wut at Brandon Moore. Was Jarec planning to share the money with his proletarian brothers? No, he was using it to get an expensive sports car and condo for himself. Exactly the same kind of shit that the people in the 1% do. Would like to hear him explain that discrepancy.

    • BobOrDoug

      RF, YOU are a SCREAM. I really did LOL. My thoughts were exactly the same. Even if I have to admit that I do find Brandon Moore to be dreamy.

  • Hudsonman

    This is all BULLSHIT plain and simple. It is Never alright to extort, coerce, or take advantage of another. That is indecent and sociopathic behavior.

    I have seen far worse abuse. It is reprehensible and those responsible and commenting in favor of the alleged abuser should be shunned.

    • andrew

      I think instead of shunning them, we should counter their arguments with logic and truth.

  • Jace

    Well, there’s a whole bucket of dumb right there. “Indoctrinated working class”? Someone’s taking Political Science 101 at the local community college. If you’re too stupid to not demand payment for your services upfront Billy, then you deserve to be ripped off. I mean, you’re 40 and you don’t know how the world works? Is Diesel the only porn star with a functioning brain on Twitter?

  • Benjam

    Take note of all of the porn stars who are escorts who agree with what jarec did and stay away from them.

    Can anyone here imagine any circumstance where it would be ok to extort your client? Rape? He said he would just stick the head in? He came on my face and not my chest?  

  • cris levin

    Billy

    you are not billionaire, what can client extort you for? your a-hole? Trust me, its no where near a million buck item.

  • Ricky

    Maybe my interpretation is wrong but I thought Jared began his extortion campaign because the john made promises he could not keep ….

    i.e. “I will cast you in my next film!” or “I will make you my bodyguard/personal trainer /production partner/ SPOUSE!”……and the idiot believed him.

  • Derek

    Diesel Washington actually making sense. *looks out window* WOW those pigs really are flying !!

  • robirob

    I think Mr. Santoro should be more selective about who he is doing business with when he gets “extorted” so many times. “Fool me once, shame on you – Fool me twice, shame on me”.

    There is no excuse for what Jarec did. Those who side with him condone the criminal offense of blackmail.

  • Gendarme

    I’m surprised Santoro had time to support the extortionist – I guess he had his calendar cleared after supporting teen-raper and gift-giver Mike Dozer. (Maybe Dozer and Jarec can share a cell!)

  • Alias74

    Well….now the real personalities come out. Are we really supporting the fact that he got away with the first part of it and then became “greedy”. It’s still ILLEGAL and IMMORAL.

    WOW. And here I always seem to revere gay porn stars like I do celebrities when it’s clear time and again, there are some troubled personalities out there with a skewed view of legality, morality, and ethics.

    Such beautiful outsides….but who knew the inside was so…….questionable.

  • Cosmic

    Well we all know Billy has a thunderously bad habit of backing the wrong wh…horse.

  • There are two sides to every story but I doubt the Feds would make an arrest and charge him if they only had one side of the story come on porn stars this is beyond your average small time shakedown.

  • Estelle

    Andrew is the notorious gay for pay defender who defends every “straight” performer. The thing about the stupid performers sticking up for tinfoil certainly don’t help their cause that pornstars aren’t narcissistic, morally bankrupt, skeevy, emotionally damaged skanks who people can write off as dumb whores whose only skill is selling their bodies. Of course that isn’t the case with every performer, but when you have performers with a high social media profile typing this bullshit they will get lumped in with those guys.

    • audiosf228

      Tinfoil? haha

  • GN

    Porn AND escorting? For crying out loud, go moonlight waiting tables at a Cheesecake Factory or something to pay your bills.

  • Randall

    The “victim” sounds very generous and was only looking for some discretion. If porn pays so badly why don’t these porn “stars” go and get another job or a part time job. He’s trash for that.

  • GMC

    For pity sake stop saying holier than thou like that is even a concept grounded in reality “holy” is an imaginary state thought up by the very power blocs that have oppressed tortured and killed our people for millenia. NOTHING is more holy than anything else because “holiness” is a marketing ploy forced upon mankind religions which would rather see all of us wiped from the planets face so Queers of all flavors stop buying into arguments about morality based on the concepts of right and wrong espoused by organized religion.

  • lordgabux

    As always Diesel becoming the voice of reason amid unreasonable stars. One thing is to do a bad thing ( I don’t judge and we were not wearing his Prada shoes), and another to try to pull the same “bad thing” twice. Greed is a bad friend and a worst counselor.