Bareback Gay Porn Star Mike Dozer Arrested On Charges Of Sexually Assaulting 14-Year-Old Boy

Posted February 8, 2014 by with 123 comments

mike dozer arrestStr8UpGayPorn has learned that bareback gay porn performer Mike Dozer was arrested in Delaware late last year on charges of statutory rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, aggravated indecent assault, and recklessly endangering another person. The multiple felony charges stem from Dozer’s (real name Christopher Steele) alleged sexual relations last summer with a 14-year-old boy in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Because Dozer, 33, is HIV-positive, the Montgomery County DA’s office added the reckless endangerment charge. Bail was set at $1,000,000, and Dozer is currently in custody in a Montgomery County prison.

mike dozer
According to police, Dozer met the 14-year-old boy via the gay hook-up app Jack’D, drove to the victim’s home in Montgomery County, PA, forced him to do poppers, and proceeded to have sex with him. Police allege that Dozer knew the victim was underage, but didn’t care. Police also say that Dozer and the 14-year-old boy exchanged nude pictures of each other before meeting. It’s unclear whether the 14-year-old boy came forward on his own after the alleged assault, or if police were already monitoring Dozer.

Dozer’s attorney, Kevin Wray, says that his client did not know the victim was underage. Wray spoke to Philadelphia Gay News:

“At some point, he came to the realization that this person wasn’t 18 and took off,” Wray said. “This kid kept pursuing him and apparently had done so with others.” Wray said Jack’D requires users to verify that they are over age 18. Steele has been HIV-positive for six years. Wray said he believes his status was disclosed during intake after his arrest.

Just prior to his arrest, Mike Dozer made news in the adult industry for glorifying bareback sex and shaming condom use via his “condoms are for pussies” t-shirt and bareback sex scene for CocksureMen. He also performed in condom scenes for Raging Stallion/Falcon Studios. His arraignment is set for February 26th.

UPDATE: Here’s the complete list of nine felony charges filed against Mike Dozer.

mike dozer 2

  • Todd

    And you were just wondering why he’d dropped out of sight. How does a 14 year old get on a gay dating site (one that I’ve never even heard of). Stories certainly differ between the police and his lawyer (which is probably usually the case).

    • Jordon Hargrove

      To verify all you have to do is put in a fake age on most sites and apps

      • JT

        but still, even if he said he was 18. why go with someone half your own age? thats pretty sick right there.

        • sxg

          Because 18 is the legal age, and for some people that’s completely fine. Personally I don’t like the idea of going with someone that young, but some of these kids do look surprisingly more mature than their actual age. Although I’ve never ran into a 14yr old that looks 18+

          • JT

            I realize 18 is legal age. I think you completely missed my point.

          • Andreaus Mitchell

            honestly, living down in Gulfport, MS I’ve seen12 yr. olds that look 25 and 18 yr. olds that look 12.

          • JoshChicago

            So, Queue the dueling banjos? It’s still YOUR responsibility to ensure your sex partner is of consenting age.

    • JoshChicago

      It’s very hard to imagine that anyone would lie about anything on an online gay hook-up app.

      • Todd

        I guess my point is that it shouldn’t be *that* easy. You should be required to enter credit card information (even if it’s a free SECURE site) ….. you’re right of course. And the kid will be held accountable for his part in the situation. Certainly any defense lawyer will try to use that ‘lie’ against him (Defense Lawyer: “When you joined the site, what were you looking for ?” “Was this experience with the defendant your first ?)

        • Jonas V.

          “Consent” of the minor and the use or absence of violence is not a criterion. If the other is minor, it is statutory rape.

          • Nunya

            Yes, but first the prosecution will have to prove the boy’s age. Which is not as easy as it sounds unless the boy cooperates in the prosecution. R. Kelly was acquitted in his child porn trial largely b/c the prosecutors couldn’t prove the girl’s age, though they brought in several witnesses who gave circumstantial evidence of her age. Without her cooperation of that of her parents they were not able to prove her age beyond reasonable doubt. The jury properly acquitted. These prosecutors could have a similar problem here. I dunno how it’s going to shake out. But I’ve seen prosecutors struggle to prove a defendant’s age in a case where their age was an element of the charge – like in minor consumption of alcohol cases, for example. I’ve seen defendants walk out w/dismissals or not guilty verdicts b/c the prosecutors couldn’t prove age.

          • Viva La Bambi

            They’ll prove his age easily, because the arrest date has been recorded by the cops and the boy is 14, currently far under the age of majority. Bring his birth certificate to the trial and it’s an open and shut case.

          • Jonas V.

            In the R. Kelly case the girl’s identity was not conclusive because she could not be recognised on the tape. In this case there seems to be intercepted electronic communication that has been traced down to the boy’s computer. From there it is just a matter of checking the boy’s birth certificate to conclude to him being underage.

  • Zoompietro

    I’d rather be a pussy with a condom than a HIV+ pedophile like Mike Dozer anyday. What a wretch.

    • sxg

      Is that you in the pic? You look hot :)

      • Zoompietro

        Yes and thanks :)

    • Andy Bryant

      He’s still presumed not guilty – you have no right to call him ‘paedophile’ until when and if he is found guilty.

      • Zoompietro

        Sorry if this upset you but the fact is I have the right to call him whatever I want to, regardless of the outcome of this case. Much like anyone can still call OJ Simpson a murderer even though the jury found him innocent. Public opinion is independent of the judicial courts. He’s presumed not guilty legally, but that has no power over what others think of him. He’s a pedophile as far as I’m concerned, case closed :)

        • sxg

          They didn’t find him innocent, they found OJ not guilty, HUGE difference. No one is technically found innocent in a court of law, they’re found not guilty, which means the evidence presented and the way presented is not sufficient enough to have a guilty verdict. I highly doubt that most of them actually believe he is innocent, but personal feelings aside they had to give the only logical verdict they believed they could.

          • Zoompietro

            You knew what I meant :p No one (in their right mind) believes OJ is innocent just because he got off and Dozer would be in the same boat. Doubt Dozer will get off though, he can’t afford a multimillion dollar legal team. Good thing he thinks “condoms are for pussies” because they don’t use them in prison anyway.

          • brianskemper

            Sorry to give you the bad news but OJ was found guilty during his second trial….

          • Zoompietro

            We’re talking about him being viewed as a murderer, his second trial was not for murder. Try and keep up.

          • Joey Thomas

            ..or we can start labeling people when there is final decision

          • Zoompietro

            Hmm an account that’s using a fake picture randomly pops up and uses it’s very first post to disagree with me shortly after Christopher Hall’s last reply to me. Fake account then goes on to “like” Christopher Hall’s posts, well that’s not super obvious at all…

        • Andy Bryant

          You don’t have to be sorry – I’ve long ceased to be upset by the many inane and inaccurate comments I see on the Web.

          • Zoompietro

            Me too, such as when I see inane and inaccurate comments telling me what my rights are.

        • Spoonie

          Well no, actually, you can’t. There are laws against slander. If you make a public statement like that (here on this post for example) which is untrue or not based on fact, and it is deemed to be damaging, you could be sued.

          • Zoompietro

            Aren’t you the legal eagle? Since you clearly don’t know the difference between libel and slander, you should just say defamation to prevent yourself from looking silly. He wouldn’t even have a case, but he’s more than welcome to file suit. I think that his legal budget might be a little too tight to spare the expense though. Either way, it’s not libelous to call someone that’s been charged with the crimes that Mr. Dozer has a pedophile (even if he hasn’t been convicted). I can also call Woody Allen a pedophile and he can’t succesfully sue me. Libel’s not that cut and dry. Where’d you get your JD from?

    • L. T.

      I’m in agreement with you. I don’t knock anyone enjoying BB because it’s different strokes for different folks.

  • JoshChicago

    If he had just joined the priesthood none of this would be happening now.

    • Eric John Roberts

      He joined the Priesthood he’d be a pedophile Priest by now and still in the press

  • James Withers

    WTF?! Can it be that hard to leave the kiddies alone? Damn! Hope he gets a fair trial, but if found guilty put his ass in prison for a LONG time.

  • Entropyguy

    Ugh. at 14 you still basically look like a child. So Steele is clearly lying or delusional if he says he didn’t know.

    • Shadow S. Black

      That is not ALWAYS true – I was able to get into bars , beer store and liquor store when I was 13 and drinking age was 21 – however that being said I believe from the report that steele new the kids age and just didn’t care – the perv.

  • sxg

    looks like consenting adults are for pussies as well.

    • robirob

      And I guess common sense is for pussies as well. Really, when you are into barely legal twinks and have no-one to protect you from the results of your reckless actions you check the trick’s ID and make sure it’s legit.

      • Zoompietro

        Doesn’t sound like he’s into barely legal twinks, sounds like he’s just a straight up pedophile. 14 ain’t barely legal, 14 is barely pubescent. He knew the kid wasn’t legal and didn’t care because he’s a sick bitch.

        • Christopher Hall

          Yeah, he’s into underage kids, that’s why he was cruising an 18+ website.

          Makes sense. After all, HE has to be responsible for other people’s lies and behaviors. Dozer should obviously run an FBI background check on each and every single trick, get fingerprints, tap their phones . . . .

          the kid should also face consequences, as should the kid’s parents.

          • Zoompietro

            He’s into underaged kids because he hooked up with an underaged kid, that’s all there is to it. You can complain about the 14yo and his parents all you want, won’t change anything. The kid isn’t the one on trial, Dozer is. Saying that the kid lied isn’t a legitimate defense and it won’t work in court, sorry to be the one to break it to you. Dozer is an adult and should’ve used better judgement, but he didn’t because he’s into barely pubescent boys.

          • Christopher Hall

            You don’t have to “break” anything to me; really hate to burst your superior bubble. And I never said that Dozer was without blame. Actions do indeed involve consequences. That was why I used the adverb “also”.

            And since the Justice system is so perfect, anything and everything there is incapable of being wrong. There is not enough personal responsibility in this world, it’s always everyone else’s fault. Remember the “affluenza” defense? Any court that finds THAT a valid defense doesn’t hold much moral ground. Sadly, it’s what we have.

            And that is like saying that a guy is into guys because he mistakenly flirts with a transvestite.

            So much for the concept of innocent until proven guilty.

          • Zoompietro

            I’ll gladly be deemed superior as opposed to supporting a pedophile. You did imply that he was without blame, you pointed out faults of the kid and his parents and none of the faults of Dozer. You used the word “also” in regards to consequences, not in regards to blame. That backtracking might work on someone else but I know how to read so it’s not gonna fly with me. When you start referring to 14yos that have been the victim of pedophilia as “tricks”, it’s time to seek help.

            “And since the Justice system is so perfect, anything and everything there is incapable of being wrong.”
            -What does that even mean?

            When adults have sex with kids, it’s the adults fault. Personal responsibility is the adult and his supporters owning up to it instead of trying to pass blame onto a 14yo kid.

            As far as the affluenza defense, that was a court in Texas not in Philadelphia where this took place. Philadelphia’s moral ground is not on trial here, yet another red herring.

            “And that is like saying that a guy is into guys because he mistakenly flirts with a transvestite.”
            -No it’s not, that’s a false equivalency. Try again.

            I’ve already explained that the concept of innocent until proven guilty has no bearing on public opinion, you can’t force people to support a pedophile just because he hasn’t been convicted.

      • sxg

        This isn’t even about common sense, this is just straight-up wrong. I highly doubt this kid looked like he was of age at all. The way Mike Dozer presents himself is he’s an opportunist to get off any way possible, and that pretty much includes pedophilia.

        • Kirt A White

          Considering how many pron start that are Of age and are cast because they look underage, looks don’t mean much anymore. I was always getting carded by security at school because i looked like I was too old.

          The fact that he is Positive and still in porn is just plain stupid.

          And what the hell is a 14 year old boy doing with a profile on a gay dating site anyway. Unless things have changed drastically you have to check the box that says you are 18 or older and then agree to terms of service. I think they both were idiots. And I say that because I have know underage kids that were the predators, they lies about their age, had the false I.D and as soon as they got laid the turned on the blackmail. Not all under age kids are innocent. I don’t know either of these men so I am not gonna speculate about who knew what, Just that they are both dumb and now two lives are ruined and more are stressed beyond reason because of it. The fall out is gonna be hell on this kids family, but from the report it is not the first time the boy did something like this.

      • Eric Miles

        From the report, I take it that he knew that the victim was 14 and didn’t care. He had sex with him knowing he was 14.

        • Nunya

          I read that he left as soon as he figured out the complainant’s age. But I haven’t read the full report.

          • Eric Miles

            This story states: “Police allege that Dozer knew the victim was underage, but didn’t care.”

          • Nunya

            The same story goes on to state: Dozer’s attorney, Kevin Wray, says that his client did not know the victim was underage. Wray spoke to Philadelphia Gay News:
            “At some point, he came to the realization that this
            person wasn’t 18 and took off,” Wray said. “This kid kept pursuing him
            and apparently had done so with others.”

            I’m not in the habit of taking police at their word, since I’ve known police reports to contain allegations that are later found to be false. Especially when dealing w/minority populations like the gays and ppl living w/HIV, who have historically had frosty relations w/most police departments.

          • JoshChicago

            And Bill Clinton didn’t inhale either.

          • Nunya

            Oh, I believe he inhaled. But not b/c the police said he did.

            Allegations in a police report are not proven fact. They are just allegations. As far as I know, that allegation in the report could be coming from the word of a 14 yr old boy who’s an admitted (or alleged?) liar. That boy misrepresented himself online as an 18 yr old. And that’s after he digitally signed a statement “verifying” his age as 18 or older. If he lied about that, how do I know he’s telling the truth about anything?

          • Viva La Bambi

            And you believe everything that a defense lawyer says? He’s trying to get his client off, the fact that he’s admitted that Dozer knew the boy was underaged is telling, he doesn’t have much of a defense.

          • Eric Miles

            I, on the other hand, find defendants to be self-serving in their proclamations of innocence. But I concede your point that he states he did not know the victim was underage.

  • GN

    Where’s that Royal Scumbag Of The Year award?

  • sxg

    I wonder where his loyal porn supporters are now! Where is Charlie Harding when you need him! :)

    • Zoompietro

      They’re all out putting money on his books.

    • JoshChicago

      Fuck Charlie Harding – Where’s NAMBLA when you need them?

    • Cosmic

      I was wondering the same thing,why hasn’t his buddy Brad Kalvo jumped to his defense and claimed all this to be a sinister plot by the Condom Lobby! :D

  • Nunya
  • NG212

    Of course this is a terrible story all around. But it’s just remarkable to me how many HIV positive performers are in gay porn, and how many of them perform in bareback porn. It’s just awful. At least the amateur studios (SC/CF/CM) seek to weed out those with STIs, rather than willingly transfer different strains between models.

    • Entropyguy

      I don’t so much care if a performer is HIV+ as long as appropriate precautions are taken. But yeah, barebacking while HIV+ is monstrously irresponsible.

      • Nunya

        Only if one doesn’t disclose. If 2 or more consenting adults want to have bareback sex though they’re all or some are poz, that’s their biz. I don’t think it’s irresponsible, necessarily. Too many variables involved for me to make such a blanket statement.

    • nsuviolin

      Depends on the circumstances. While other STDs will be an ongoing concern, and the risk is always there, if one is on anti retroviral medication and is undetectable, passing or contracting HIV is virtually impossible, regardless of condom usage.

      • sbd

        From the website of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control: “People with an undetectable viral load still have HIV in their body, which means there is a chance that they can transmit HIV through sex or sharing needles or injection equipment. An HIV-positive person can infect a partner even if they have an undetectable viral load, because HIV may be found in genital fluids (e.g., semen, vaginal fluids). The viral load test only measures virus in blood. Although antiretroviral therapy also lowers viral load in genital fluids, HIV can sometimes be present in genital fluids even when it is undetectable in the blood. Your viral load may go up between tests. When these “blips” happen, you may be more likely to pass HIV to sexual partners. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) increase viral load in genital fluids. This means that an HIV-positive person with an STI may be able to transmit HIV to sexual partners even if the blood viral load is undetectable.”

        • Nunya

          keyword: “may” as opposed to “shall”.

          • sbd

            “Can” is the key word. As in “An HIV-positive person can infect their partner even if they have an undetectable viral load.”

          • Nunya

            As opposed to “will”. Sure.

  • JT

    I think he’s disgusting! The pedophilia thing alone makes him a piece of shit! The fact he thinks Condoms are for P*ssies, tells you something too… it says he’s very selfish and only concerned with his sexual pleasures and does not give a rats ass about the health or well being of others.
    I think he deserves the Electric Chair myself.

  • Matthew T Langan

    Ship that poz pos off to Russia.

  • Estelle

    In other gay porn news, Mike Dozer has just been cast in the new Woody Allen movie!

  • No

    Shit a porn star that the crazies can’t claim is secretly gay for pay. That sucks for them.

    :(

  • mlpjlk01

    Not that I am condoning this person’s behavior if he did in fact know the other person’s age but I do know lots of coaches that had sex with under age high school girls..but don’t know if a condom was or wasn’t used..I guess it is ok as long as it is man/woman sex. It seems odd that police were tracking him but didn’t attempt to stop it.

  • nsuviolin

    I’m almost willing to bet that Dozer is more the victim here than the kid. An underage teenager lying about his age to sign up for an 18+ hook-up app sends up all kinds of red flags, IMO. Also, what is on Dozer’s profile? He likely discloses that he’s a porn star (most of them do), does bareback and is poz. But time will tell, I guess. Regardless, we shouldn’t jump to conclusions here.

    • Viva La Bambi

      The only red flags it raises is that he’s been sexualized at a young age, which is common with victims of abuse. I feel bad for the kid.
      In situations like this it’s the adult’s responsibility to make sure he’s of age. Dozer especially should know, porn studios don’t just take your word for it, you have to give proof of age.

    • zach

      Ugh. Have fun “betting” against a 14-year-old kid in favor of some sleazebag whose entire public persona was about being reckless, irresponsible, careless, and destructive.

      • nsuviolin

        A 14 year-old kid that lied about his age to gain access to an app that’s designated for adults, and willingly gave this guy his address and invited him over. Yea, I think I’ll hold up just fine. But really, my main point here is to acknowledge all possibilities based on the facts that we truly know and don’t jump to conclusions.

      • Nunya

        So if he had a public persona you liked, would this story have appeared on Str8upgayporn? If this had been Jake Bass or Austin Wilde or any other actor who has never appeared in a bareback scene, would the story have appeared here?

        • Zoompietro

          Congrats for having the dumbest reply for this article. You look like a true cunt implying that Zach would ignore a rape case if he liked the perpatrator. Attacking Zach’s integrity doesn’t make Mike Dozer look any better. This is why no one should get up in arms over the fact that Zach blocks people from commenting on here, some people need to be blocked.

          • Nunya

            I’m not defending Mr. Dozer. And I’m sure if some other actor had been so accused and that other actor had never appeared in a bareback scene the coverage here wouldn’t be so gleeful, nor would the comments in response to it.

          • Zoompietro

            How is reporting the story unfair treatment? There you go again insinuating that Zach would show preferential treatment to a pedophile as long as he hadn’t done bareback. Is it cold under your bridge Mr. Troll? Why haven’t you been blocked yet?

    • JT

      WRONG!!!! If the man had any morals at all he would have said NO! you are just beyond wrong to say that the accused is the victim in any way shape or form!

    • DC

      Victim blaming much?

  • Dean

    That’s a damn shame. I’m not gonna be so quick to call him a pedo. I know several young guys, age 14, that definitely look 18 or older. And just the same, I know several 20-30somethings that still look like teens.

  • sbd

    He’s gonna make a fine pussy in prison.

  • Cosmic

    I can’t wait to see the clever shirt Charlie Harding designs for him to wear to trial…Any ideas?

    • Dutch Courage

      “I was fooled by a 14 year old pussy. Honestly!”
      *
      In jail his shirt will simply read: “Prison Pussy”.

      • Cosmic

        In prison he’ll be fucked alright when the other inmates find out he’s a kid diddler but not in the way he’s used to.

        • Estelle

          He probably wouldn’t be in general population in prison since he’s hiv positive.

  • andgoal

    Damn, can we chill out with the moralism for a second? I do not think that this is acceptable behavior because of our social conventions and mōrēs, and it’s unquestionably illegal so he should be tried, and if found guilty, sentenced appropriately. But first, let’s try to name the correct psychological ‘disorder’ if that’s what’s at stake here, i.e., ephebophile not pedophilia. Second, let’s not over-emphasize how all adolescents look like ‘kids’, as if all their bodies are the same because they aren’t the same; and while some 14yr olds look younger than they are, others look older particularly those involved in sporting and athletics. Third, legal ages of consent vary (from state to state, and nation to nation). I’ve never actually seen his porn (I could care less), but I still found the responses on here largely frustrating. What, now that Macklemore sings about us, we’re gonna prove to those damn straights that we can get out our pitchforks with the best of ‘em?! … more “homo-normal”. tsk tsk.

    • EithanVocarro

      Yeah, you’re forgetting that the average Str8upgayporn commenter is just all about being predictably reactionary and ironically provincial for people trolling around a porn blog. Thanks for the attempted dose of reality.

    • Viva La Bambi

      I’m not necessarily one for normalizing Queers, but if protecting kids from sexual abuse and HIV is normal, well I’m ok with being normal in that regard.

  • ocram1

    Chris Hansen? Calling Chris Hansen?

  • http://twitter.com/seaguy11 Aaron Hudson

    Innocent until proven guilty but this is not looking good for him. WTF was he thinking? Unless the kid lied and looks way over 14, there is no excuse he is and was jail bait.

  • http://twitter.com/seaguy11 Aaron Hudson

    Where are the 14 yr olds parents anyway? They just let thier kid whore around on adult hook up sites?

  • Brandon

    wait, why are you calling this 14-year-old a “victim”? he put himself on Jack’D, lied in order to do so, and invited Dozer to his house to have sex. we’re delusional to believe that a 14-year-old does not have sexual urges.

    • Zoompietro

      We’re delusional to think that it’s ok for a 30 something year old man to help a 14yo fulfill those urges. If a 14yo expresses to me that they have sexual urges, I’ll tell them to seek relief with another 14yo. I’m not going to drive to his house to give him the D.

      • Brandon

        you don’t know the situation. you were not there. i’m sure you don’t ID every person you have sex with. if someone want’s to have sex their going to have sex. yes, it’s a crime, but the age that the law determines is legal is arbitrary anyway. it’s 13-18 depending on what country you’re in. and your brain doesn’t stop developing until you’re 25 anyway. should we move the age of consent to then???

        • Zoompietro

          Well in the country that this happened in, he broke the law. Nothing arbutrary about it. You can stop with the red herrings, this isn’t about changing the age of consent or what the age of consent is in other countries. No where in the USofA is a 14yo able to consent to sex with an adult. Oh and I actually do make sure that anyone I’m having any type of sex with is of legal age hunny, I don’t have any aspirations to be someone’s prison bitch.

  • DJWILL1234

    I Personally Don’t Think That Christopher Steele Should Be Sent To Jail Or Already Be In Jail Due To The Fact That Signing Up For A Gay Hookup App It Requires You To Confirm That Your Above 18 Yrs Old. That 14 Yr Old Should Be The One Along With His Parents Getting Into Trouble. http://0.tqn.com/d/im/1/0/A/Y/-/-/Jackd-Download-3.png Here Is The Terms And Conditions It Clearly States That You Are To Be 18 Or Older. And If Anyone Has Anything To Add To This That’s Pointing It The Other Way They Can Go Fuck Them Self’s. I Also Read That Christopher Supposedly Knew He Was Underage, Um That Kid Must Not Have Liked That Guy After He Had Fun And Decided He Was Going To A.) Turn Him In For Assault And B.) Lie About What Happened. He Is Loosing Everything Now Due To A Kid That Likes To Lie And Fuck Older Guys. Text Me If If You Think This Is Nothing But A Suppid Case On Chris’s Part 323-929-7603

    • JoshChicago

      It also states that you shall be respectful of one another and that no illegal (eg:fake) photos be used. If these TOS were fully enforced, there would be far fewer members on that app than there is now. Blaming a 14 year old boy solely for Dozer’s reckless behavior is pathetic. He has been granted bond just like mostly everyone else. If you cant pay your bond, you sit in jail. period. Next.

    • Viva La Bambi

      If a underage child ends up in porn, they are not punished, the porn producer is. Mike Dozer should have known to ask for proof of ID if he wasn’t sure about the kid’s age – that happens every time you shoot a porn scene.

      • Nunya

        And if the kid shows a fake ID to Dozer he’s still in the same boat right now. Having asked for ID and being shown a fake is no defense against a statutory rape charge. Which is fucked up, IMO.

  • DJWILL1234

    All I’m Gonna Say is the kid still Lied and fucked up another guys career

    • JoshChicago

      LOL! fucked up a guys HIV+ barebacking career! Even a multi-felon dude like Sebastian Young gets porn work after being locked up. Please get real.

  • David F.

    The little bastard was fourteen, NOT four! Fourteen is legal in Puerto
    Rico and multiple other places around the world. When I was fourteen, I
    was cheerfully fucking forty year olds. The PC Nazis need to cry me a river and get the fuck over it.

    • sxg

      Well good for you in Puerto Rico but here in the US the age of consent is 18, 16 in some cases. And no matter whether you think that has anything to do with PC Nazis, that is the law and if you don’t like it go and change it.

      • David F.

        There’s fourteen year olds LEGALLY fucking around the world as we speak. And there’s nothing you can do about it. I love that it gripes your whiny PC Pussy ass :)

        • sxg

          You’re absolutely right and I don’t care to do anything about it, because that is not my country so those are not my rules to abide by. I live in the US and so long as I live here, I will abide by the rules and the rules state that at a man my age I am not allowed to sleep around anyone under the age of 18, and I am completely fine with that, because anyone close to that age doesn’t attract me in the least bit.

          And this isn’t about 14yr olds having sex. 14yr olds can have sex all they want. This is about a man who is older than 18yrs old (33 to be exact) having sex with a boy that is 14yrs old. Legally in the US that is wrong, and it’s clear that everyone in the US knows that.

        • Brandon

          thank you!

    • LB

      BS! I looked it up. Age of consent in Puerto Rico is 16. Sex with a 14 year old is a 2nd degree felony in Puerto Rico.

  • sxg

    OK found this link from another blog:

    http://www.phoenixvillenews.com/general-news/20131229/del-man-charged-in-limerick-sexual-assault-case

    Did a bit of google mapping and apparently Newark, Delaware and Limerick Pennsylvania are a little over an hour’s drive. Why the hell would he go an drive all the way to Limerick if Philadelphia is much closer, and have probably better-looking strange??? I think he specifically sought out this kid because of his age.

  • Zoompietro

    75 comments in, congrats on breaking the story Zach! I see a lot of the other blogs had to play catch up. Not too shabby for a site once deemed a “tiny blog” by Billy “Pug Face” Santoro.

    • A.C.

      Here, here! I second that statement – Good for you Zach!

  • DJWILL1234

    Ok With The Proofing Of ID. I’m Not Going To Ask For An ID Unless A.) They Look Like They Are Underage. I Don’t Agree With Any Comment. I Think He’s Innocent Point Blank. The Kid Lied

    • Zoompietro

      What’s B.)? Also, you don’t have to ask for ID, you can choose to be that stupid if you want but know this, if you sleep with someone under the age of consent YOU will be prosecuted. They won’t care that YOU choose to be willfully ignorant and not verify their age. The “they looked legal” defense does not work in a kangaroo court, let alone a court of law.

    • JoshChicago

      And what’s “B?” You’re an idiot so whatever “B” was, doesn’t really matter.

    • Viva La Bambi

      Well thank you for your keen legal analysis, thankfully it will have fuck all influence in this case because we follow laws, not commenter’s opinions.

  • DJWILL1234

    Well I Guess It Differs From State To State

  • Estelle

    I’m 100! You bitches!

  • Terry

    You don’t have to be a genius or know him personally to understand that he’s a totally irresponsible person (he’s a HIV positive 33 years old porn actor who promotes bareback sex !!!), this bad story is just a result.

  • troym40

    I was 15 when I first had sex with a 32yo man. It’s not rape and your not a victim if you know what you want and actively seek it.

  • Dave Babler

    Let’s wait to cast stones here. When I was underage I lied about my age all the time to hook up with older dudes. I was however smart enough to use rubbers/insist he use them depending on whether I topped or bottomed. I was a fucking liar online when I was under 18 and I once told a dude when he figured out I was underage, if he didn’t sleep with me, I’d lie and go to the police and say he tried to molest me. While I realize now those actions were manipulative and wrong, I just want to point out, teenage boys can be especially heinous when trying to get laid. Yes, I know I’m posting this with my real name, why? Because I have the balls to show I’m not trolling.

  • Brad

    Let’s face it, kids today don’t know from HIVAids. Mike Dozer was 1 year old when it came out in the media. By the time he was 18, AIDS prevention was being discussed a lot less in the media, to the point that today, when one can live normally with HIVAIDS, kids have bareback sex all over the place and it’s back in gay porn.. All this to say that until it is curable, one should still practice safe sex. I wonder if his fellow actors with whom he has had sex were told by him or the studio before scenes that he was HIV positive? Just saw a scene with him and Tommy Defendi. Did Tommy know he was HIV positive before he had sex with him? Dozer was trolling for teenagers because men his own age must be too old for him. He deserves to be in jail. It’s not that hard to stay away from teenagers if you really want to.